Skip over navigation

The Brothers Grimm

Rated - 3 stars

The Brothers Grimm: Heath Ledger and Matt Damon

Mr. Terry Gilliam and his sometime writing partner Tony Grisoni (Tideland, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas) take an unusual credit for The Brothers Grimm Dress pattern makers.

This would be a coy reference to the fact that the Writers' Guild has allocated sole script credit to the prolific Ehren Kruger (The Ring; Scream 3; The Skeleton Key; Arlington Road), who wrote the original screenplay. Presumably Messrs Gilliam and Grisoni feel this does not reflect the extent of their subsequent work on the film - a historical fantasy about the famous fairytale-tellers (Jake and Will in this version, played by the oddly English-accented Heath Ledger and Matt Damon) touring mittel-Europa scamming superstitious peasants by exorcising non-existent spooks.

The Brothers Grimm: Monica BulluciWhoever wrote the script, it's a bit of a dog's breakfast. And from what one can deduce, the film editor, Lesley Walker, probably deserves a story credit too. 'Patchwork quilt maker', perhaps? Then there are 11 men (all men) credited as producer and/or associate/executive producer, most notably Harvey and Bob Weinstein, once upon a time of Miramax, the company that bankrolled Brothers Grimm to the tune of $80 million or more.

It was Harvey Weinstein who refused to allow Gilliam to cast Samantha Morton in the movie - insisting on Lena Headey instead. ('He said Sam will win an Oscar one day and she will win it in a Miramax movie - but it won't be in this one,' Morton lamented to me a couple of years ago.) And it was Harvey Weinstein who fired Gilliam's favourite DP, Nicola Pecorini half way through the shoot, replacing him with Newton Thomas Sigel. ('I prepped it, started it, and then they decided it was a bad thing that Gilliam was shooting the movie the way Gilliam wanted to shoot the movie,' Pecorini explained to me on the set of Tideland last year. 'Of course he shot it his way anyway.')

The Brothers Grimm: Lena HeadeyThe last time I spoke with Terry Gilliam he wasn't saying much about all this - he was contractually bound to keep his mouth shut, and anyway was still hoping to get his cut of the movie out in the cinemas. But he did say that the pressure to deliver an audience on such a big budget movie (his most expensive by far) was always on his mind.

That audience hasn't turned out for Brothers Grimm in the US, although its $37 million gross to date may be enough for the studio to break even down the line.

Watching the movie, it is easy to blame Miramax for a story that never quite makes sense and a tone that oscillates between horror, suspense, and knockabout Python-esque comedy. But the truth is that Terry Gilliam's strengths have never been for story structure or a consistent tone. He's anarchic by nature, and all his movies reflect that. Including this one.

The Brothers Grimm: Heath Ledger There are wonderful things in this film: dark woods that creep up on you; kittens thrown into torture devices; a couple of phantastic transformation scenes which have to be seen to be believed (not to mention several good actors making completes asses of themselves) It's literate and intriguing and full of inventive bits and pieces. But it never gels. It's by no means as funny as it wants to be, rarely scary, and the jerryrigged climax is a damp squib. I hate to say it, but I didn't like the way Gilliam shot the movie either: too much wide angle whackiness becomes grueling after a while.

It might be that on another day, watching it at home after a beer, the movie's virtues will outweigh its vices. Who knows, maybe there is a leaner, crisper, more coherent director's cut lurking in here somewhere. But I have to say I doubt it.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about The Brothers Grimm »

Critics' Reviews

Premiere

With dazzling, inspired imagery of the grotesque-caricature, lyrical-fairy-tale, and harrowing-nightmare variety, sometimes all at once.

Time Out

Its not magic, Will admits of his brother Jakes flashy armour. Its just shiny. The Brothers... read more on www.timeout.com

Rolling Stone

It's Gilliam's chance to run amok, and watching him do it is eye-popping fun

See all 4 Critics' Reviews »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 2 starsDisappointing

Gromit Gromit from Canterbury , 20/05/2006

I was really looking forward to seeing this film, it had a lot of promise, unfortunately however I found the result really quite disappointing. Don't get me wrong though there are elements to this film that are good - the cast are great, Gilliam's visions are as vivid as ever and in places it is both amusing and scary. Unfortunately the film as a whole just does not work. I found it incredibly boring in places, so much so, the only way that I really made it through the film completely was by dividing it into half hour chunks were I would turn off the DVD player and go and do something else for a while. It was truly difficult...although I'm not entirely sure why as the plot is straightforward and there is plenty of CGI to keep you amused. Possibly it was overlong, possibly it was underdeveloped, I'm not sure....but what I am sure of is that I won't be watching it again to try and work it out! Not one to avoid - but don't choose it unless you've got absolutely nothing better to watch.

  31 out of 34 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 0 starsCack

MrBen MrBen from Manchester , 25/01/2007

Clearly Gilliam thought of the title before writing the script. Couldn't watch till the end as I would have had to chew my own kneecap off to relive the boredom.

  25 out of 33 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsGrimm by name not by nature

A customer from Hertford, England , 04/11/2005

This is a very funny film and you can easily see it was directed by Terry Gilliam - his touch is throughout the whole thing. There are a lot of cheesy moments but on the whole it is funny. It is full of references to the fairy tales but it is not a childrens movie. It has a few moments that caused me to jump and made me stay on the edge of my seat. Go, relax and enjoy - don't take life too seriously.

  22 out of 27 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsgive it a go

charlie from london , 12/06/2006

unfairly slated, I found it to be great fun, it rolled along at a nice pace and had some brilliantly funny and genuinely dark moments.

the brothers were likable, not to mention easy on the eye, and there were some beautiful sets- trees and castles and everything you need in a gothic fairytale. lots of people seemed to think the special effects were terrible, but I didn't really notice that, and as we learnt from george lucas: special effects do not a movie make.

if you were put off by the reviews when it was at the cinema, go to it with an open mind and I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

  16 out of 16 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 4 starsLike the director, not the actors.

Sadeyes57 from Kent , 02/01/2007

There is a lot here about people liking the actors, which is cool, but doesn't really work for Terry Gilliam films. I love Johnny Depp, but Fear and Loathing was not held by him. Gilliam is, as ever, surreal and bizarre. His dark twist and meshing of fairy tales was intriguing. I have always felt that fairy tales were scary and was relieved that someone else actually agreed with me! If you like Gilliam then you will love this and his artistic eye and amazing sets, if you are not so much of a fan then you may not enjoy this film. You will not know if you don't find out. BTW, Matt Damon's flicking between a awful English accent and his normal American voice was a little tiresome and yeah, I agree, he does look daft in sideburns, but I'm not much of a fan anyway!

  8 out of 8 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 3 starsIt was OK

Jester from Glasgow [Highly rated reviewer] , 27/01/2008

Ok this film is a strange one. I felt that the film was well made and that the acting was ok but something bothered me about it. Something I could not quite put my finger on at first but eventually shone through.

I should point out that generally I love Terry Gilliam films. I think that although they may not be entertainment for the masses I really do feel as if I am watching a very talented film-maker who always has a strong vision of what his film will be and how it will make you feel. Due to this I always look forward to watching a TG film.

A general issue with this film is that it is water down TG. You can see what he wanted to aim for but due to career and studio politics it feels like he had to go with the flow to a certain extent.

The plot is the real problem though. There are three plot threads in this movie and they are not weighed properly. What you think will be the main plot (Monica B) isn't. The Sub plot of the Tracker is muddy and never made clear and what should be the catalyst for the main plot and nothing more (The French) is totally overplayed and takes up too much screen time. For me this meant that the film had no real centre point to work with and lost focus.

I recommend watching it if you're a TG fan but otherwise I wouldn't bother making it a high priority.

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews