Skip over navigation

Capote

Rated - 4 stars

Capote: Philip Seymour Hoffman

Philip Seymour Hoffman doesn’t look much like the novelist Truman Capote. He’s several inches taller and altogether a bigger, bulkier figure. He barely approximates his voice either, which Gore Vidal described as ‘so high only a dog could hear it.’

If you’re curious to see the real Capote (and a very curious fellow he was too) take a look at the 1976 Neil Simon comedy Murder by Death. Simon wanted an unusual villain: a ‘short, pudgy man with a high pitched voice and a tongue as short as a stiletto… someone like Truman Capote’. The filmmakers went one better and cast Capote himself (‘Gore Vidal must be dying’ gloated Truman.)

Judging by Murder by Death, Capote couldn’t have played Capote with anything like the grace of Philip Seymour Hoffman. But he isn’t remembered for his acting abilities – even his enemies allowed Capote was a natural born writer; ‘the best writer of my generation’ avowed Norman Mailer.

In 1959, when the film begins, Truman was basking in the glow of Breakfast at Tiffany’s. His first novel made him the toast of New York’s literary scene, and two years later Blake Edwards’ movie version with Audrey Hepburn as Holly Golightly would be deemed the height of sophistication.

To go from that to In Cold Blood – a true-crime account of the slaughter of a family of Midwestern farmers by two ex-cons who expected there to be more than pocket change on the premises – that would be like Wes Anderson following up The Royal Tanenbaums with Monster.

Capote: Philip Seymour HoffmanSomething in the senselessness of the crime caught Capote’s attention. He got on a train to Kansas with his pal Harper Lee (whose own book, To Kill A Mockingbird, was yet to be published) and started interviewing friends of the family for a New Yorker magazine piece.

Although he was a very odd duck for the conservative midwest, Capote parlayed his fame into incredible access to the key players: the local sheriff, friends of the victims, and finally the killers themselves all spoke with him for hours, weeks, years. By the time he was through, it would be five years later and there would a 120, 000 word book that he claimed was the first non-fiction novel.

In Cold Blood was as influential a piece of writing as any book of the last half century: bringing novelistic techniques to reportage, it transformed journalism and the novel, making the former more vibrant, the latter more vital, but also definitively muddying the waters between ‘truth’ and fact. ‘Truman Capote has made lying an art,’ observed Vidal. ‘A minor art.’

Written by Dan Futterman and directed by Bennett Miller (old acting friends of Hoffman’s) Capote the movie finds it useful to explore what Capote the writer left out: namely his own ambiguous role in these lives. He found a defense lawyer for the killers Perry Smith and Richard Hickcock when he needed more interview time with them, thought nothing of lying and manipulating to get them to open up, then dropped them when he needed an ending for his book (ie execution by hanging).

Capote: Philip Seymour Hoffman

As sheriff Alvin Dewey (Chris Cooper) comments here, the title of his book could be pointed right back at him. Asked by Harper Lee (Catherine Keener) if he holds Perry Smith ‘in esteem’ (this probably is how writers talked in the 50s), Truman can only reply, ‘Well, he’s a goldmine.’

The film comes down hard on Capote’s ‘betrayal’, implying that his conscience blocked him from completing another book and plunged him into alcoholism. Even so, we don’t entirely lose sympathy with the writer – we sense that it’s his inspiration that drives him on, not financial greed. He was compelled to create his masterpiece.

Truman was probably sincere when he said on another occasion that Hickock and Smith were the closest friends he ever had. In the movie’s most quoted line, Truman tells Harper Lee ‘It’s as if Perry and I grew up in the same house. And one day he went out the back door and I went out the front.’

It’s that complex level of identification across social boundaries that gives the film its emotional wallop – kudos to Clifton Collins Jr as Perry Smith too – and makes this seven year journey stand for much more than a literary footnote.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about Capote »

Critics' Reviews

USA Today

The complexity of a gifted author, as well as his self-aggrandizing nature, are what the film focuses on. Hoffman delivers a thrilling and profound Oscar-caliber performance that will haunt viewers well after the movie is over

New York Times

A fascinating and fine-grained reconstruction... Not only does Mr. Hoffman achieve an impressive physical and vocal transformation... but he also conveys, with clarity and subtlety, the complexities of Capote's temperament

Entertainment Weekly

Rapt, absorbing and thrillingly perceptive... CAPOTE honors its subject by doing just what Truman Capote did. It teases, fascinates, and haunts

See all 4 Critics' Reviews »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 1 starThe Whispering

Vladimir Ripjakokof from London, UK , 30/04/2007

Philip Seymour Hoffman must do an incredible job of impersonating Truman Capote in this movie (I don't know this for sure because I, unlike the self congratulatory critics it seems, never knew Mr Capote). I have no idea why else this film would have met with the critical acclaim it did. I refuse to believe that I just didnt get it or that it was too smart for me--this film was anything but.

Hoffman whispers his way through the movie making the dialogue very difficult to hear, let alone care about.

The film plods and this is compounded on by underdeveloped characters for whom the viewer can build no kind of empathy.

  70 out of 93 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsTo be honest I didn't know who he was.

Antony Leigh from Manchester, England , 08/01/2007

I had no idea who Truman Capote was until this film was released. I have not read In Cold Blood but I did see Breakfast at Tiffany's! Does that count?

Anyway I watched it and thought it was fantastic. Excellent acting worthy of the oscar he achieved. Catherine Keener goes from 40 yr old virgin to a brilliant portrayal of Harper Lee.

Basically it's worthy of all the great reviews that are better written than this one!

5 stars and worth it.

  36 out of 48 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsOver Hyped

A customer from Belfast , 27/02/2006

This flim and its reviews have hyped the style and skill of this film far too much. It has raised expectations past what any film can achieve. The first hour or so is made of bland and largely uninteresting conversation pieces between Capote and various other actors.

The film uses dull colours and shading so much that this lighting method becomes incredibly obvious adn thus ineffective. The acting is largely drab with many seeming to rely on Seymour-Hoffmans strong acting.

There is a strong lack of exploration of the psychology between Capote and Perry. When quite obviously Capote sees a huge similarity between himself and Perry.

Also what comes accross is Truman Capote's callousness, self adulating arrogance, attention seeking and arrogance in how he used these two men for his own gains. Is this really the kind of man a film of this stature should be made about?

Save the £4 or so and just go to the pub.

  35 out of 55 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsIn Cold Blood

KitKat from North London , 04/03/2006

Philip Seymour Hoffman's Truman Capote is smug, self-involved and downright creepy. Hoffman undoubtedly deseves some credit for creating a character so monstrously unlikeable; unfortunately, the narrow scope of the film means that it is cold and unlikeable as well.

A biopic of such a repulsive man is akin to a well crafted but portrait of an ugly person: you can appreciate the skill and effort that went into making it, but you don't really want to sit and look at it for two hours.

  28 out of 39 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 5 starsAN EXCELLENT MOVIE

Carol Campbell from Lancashire , 01/02/2007

Strong acting saves this film. Philip Seymour Hoffman deserved the Oscar for the portrayal of Capote. Very strong cinematography. Could have explored the relationship between Perry Smith and Capote a bit more.

A very good movie - would recommend.

  5 out of 8 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 4 starsThe story behind the story

A customer from Swansea , 31/12/2007

A fascinating story about how Capote wrote his famous In Cold Blood. Even if you don't know Capote's work, this film is well worth watching. Hoffman carries the film with a great performance.

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews