Skip over navigation

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

Rated - 3.5 stars

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: Daniel Radcliffe

In order to get into a preview of Harry Potter the 4th my seven year old and I had to get up at the crack of dawn, drive for an hour out into the burbs, then queue another hour in a line that snaked out of the cinema, out of the shopping mall, and into the wet and windy parking lot. Breakfast was popcorn and frozen yoghurt.

And the movie? Like the breakfast, it was tasty enough for a while but ultimately rather indigestible. I would estimate my son spent about sixty of the whopping 157 minute running time with his head buried - turtle-like - in his sweater. You see, Harry is growing up, and the series is becoming darker around him. Which is fine for children who started out his peers, but is not such great news for parents of younger kids who have been infected with Potter-mania in the interim.

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma WatsonThat said, my son didn't seem to mind self-censoring the scary stuff, and far as I can tell appears undamaged by the experience. It's also the case that while Goblet of Fire deserves its 12A certificate (it's PG-13 in the US) director Mike Newell has shied away from anything too violent. Sometimes bewilderingly so. When the Quidditch World Cup is disrupted by supernatural terrorists, Newell not only cuts away from the attack - even the aftermath is just a barren field. If you haven't read the book, you'd be puzzled. I can say this with complete confidence, not having read it myself.

Like his predecessors in the director's chair, Newell is hamstrung by the need to cram a huge book (734 pages) into feature-length without leaving out any thing which might upset author JK Rowling or her gazillion fans. The result is unwieldy. The backbone of the narrative this time is the Tri-wizard tournament, in which 14-year-old Harry is a surprise fourth entrant. Each of the contestants has to best a dragon - but there simply isn't time to show us the first three encounters, we only have eyes for Harry. (Perhaps they will show up as DVD supplements?)

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: Rupert GrintAs I say, Harry is growing up fast. Though not as fast as actor Daniel Radcliffe, who looks all of his 16 years. He's not only facing down dragons; at least as much screen time concerns his quest to find a date for the New Year ball and a jealous tiff with pal Weasley (Rupert Grint).

Perplexingly, Weasley asks one girl for a date and goes to the ball with someone else entirely without any explanation - but perhaps I misunderstood. No prizes for guessing that neither date is Hermione: Weasley and HP must be the only adolescent boys on the planet who don't appreciate Ms. Granger's charms.

Nevertheless, Harry remains a steadfast friend. You might wish that his triumphs in the various challenges before him involved some ingenuity on his part, and not just the intervention of powers both beneficent and malign, but at least he proves his virtue: he's a decent enough hero when all is said and done.

Harry Potter and the Goblet of FireThe movie's entertainment values are familiar by now: it's packed to the gills with splendidly elaborate special effects which manage to be both wonderfully spectacular and credibly integrated into the Hogwarts' universe (the Quidditch stadium, the dragon, and a maze more fiendish even than the one from The Shining are particularly impressive). But the sfx are matched by the larger the life characterisations of a stellar (mostly) British cast. Standouts this time are Brendan Gleason as 'Mad Eye' Moody, and Shirley Henderson in a delightful cameo as Moaning Myrtle.

At last this series is accumulating some welcome emotional ballast to shore up its wizz-bang set pieces and eccentric comic accoutrements. But it would be even better if the producers would bite the bullet and distill the book for cinema release, and keep the full unedited version for DVD. Goblet of Fire is still trying to do both with decidedly patchy results.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire »

Critics' Reviews

Sight and Sound

In granting THE GOBLET OF FIRE an earthier real-world tone, Newell has crafted a parable about the pains and pangs of adolescence. In doing so, he has made the most grown-up Potter yet.

New York Times

The director Mike Newell embraces the saga's dark side with flair... The combination of British eccentricity, fatalism and steady-on pluck remains intact.

Time Out

And so we come to part four in the proposed septet of fantastical wizard flicks. Brit helmsman Mike Newells made a... read more on www.timeout.com

See all 6 Critics' Reviews »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 5 starsHarry Potter with His Giblets on Fire

Rip from Manchester [Highly rated reviewer] , 13/06/2006

Like all the Harry Potter films this is excellent.

I always look forward to enjoying a good 2 hours of magic.

great to see Miss Jones from 'Rising Damp' on the screen again too!

  70 out of 71 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsBetter than I expected

Gromit Gromit from Canterbury , 23/06/2006

First off, I haven't read the books so I can't tell you how closely it relates. However as a film its a worthy watch. The effects are good, the acting is solid and the cast are certainly the 'best of british'. My only complaint is that the script is quite poor in places and there are noticeable chunks of storyline missing - some of the edits leave a lot to be desired and even though I haven't read the book, I could tell that there was pretty large pieces of the storyline missing. It appears that the editor/producer/director believes that no-one will be watching this film unless they've read the book first. This did make it a little confusing (and somewhat annoying) in places but not enough to spoil the overall effect of the film. I still thoroughly enjoyed it. One last warning though, do not let young children watch this film unsupervised - its really quite disturbing near the end and I could certainly imagine younger children getting upset. Possibly one you'd want to watch first before letting your kids see it. A solid 8/10 for entertainment value alone.

  24 out of 30 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsCan't complain

Alexander Howard from Nottingham , 20/11/2005

Being someone who's read all the Harry Potter books - I enjoyed them but am hardly an obsessive fan - I can appreciate the problems they had with making this film. It crosses the finish line at just over two and a half hours making it rather long for a 'family film' and yet it still missed or overlooked a hell of a lot of the material when compared with the book. The end result is something that I fear will dissapoint the hardcore potter fans while being overly long for those who've never read the books - and there is no doubt that there are many people who will see this film who have not.

This is a great shame as Goblet of Fire has been very well made and is certainly a lot of fun if you don't take it too seriously. The acting is still dodgy in places, especially from the kids, but there is no doubt they have improved since the earlier Potter installments, where the line delivery made me cringe.

The special effects are stunning, the dragons in particular. But this is no more than we expect these days, post Lord of the Rings/New Star Wars trilogies. There's very little character development of the main characters (with the exception of Voldemort) which takes the sideline in place of fanatsy action and all-around fun.

No, it's not and never was going to be as good as the book - I could list everything they left out and it would go on forever. But they gave it a fair shot and arguably produced the best Potter film yet. For that credit is deserved. Four stars.

  23 out of 33 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsbest of them all so far

crazee9290 from staffs , 27/02/2006

i really enjoyed this one, i thought it was better then the "prisoner of azkaban" which was a bit of a let down, but goblet was just fast paced and funny and stayed well to the book.

can't wait for the dvd.

Brilliant

  14 out of 19 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 5 starsHARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE

cher from Hornchurch [Highly rated reviewer] , 06/04/2008

GREAT FILM AS ALWAYS - ANXIOUSLY AWAITING TO SEE NEXT FILM

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 5 starsBrilliant!

A customer from england , 19/02/2006

This thrilling movie of chances between life and death is a brilliant sequel to the over movies. Daniel Radcliffe has proved to us that school can be fun, or just scary. Whether its surprise school tests or revenge-seeking madmen!

  3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews


* The Amazon.co.uk prices on our site are updated every 24 hours and may not be up to date at the time you view this page.
To see the current new and "new and used" Amazon.co.uk prices, please click on the Buy button.