Skip over navigation

Hostel

Rated - 3 stars

Hostel

It only seems like last week that John Carpenter was telling us horror movies these days had to be pitched at teenage girls and a PG-13 certificate. Evidently no one told Eli Roth, who has followed his bacterial Cabin Fever with the even more disgusting Hostel (released this week). That remake of The Hills Have Eyes takes no prisoners either. Seems like horror is getting seriously horrid again.

I would like to suggest this is somehow linked to what is going on Iraq – just as critics have claimed Night of the Living Dead, The Exorcist and their spawn were a reaction to the Vietnam war. But in that case the increased violence on TV news is supposed to have encouraged filmmakers to get more realistic. This war is pretty much happening off screen. More likely, these things are cyclical, and while it was fun to enjoy wisecracking post-modern stalkers like Freddy Krueger for a spell, the jokes get stale eventually and you find you want to get back to basics.

On top of that, there’s the influence of the Asian horror masters like Miike Takashi, whose work pushes past taboos American filmmakers simply couldn’t conceive of. Over the last few years, hardcore horror fans have been gravitating to these Japanese and Korean films, in part because they’re more stylish and original than their Hollywood counterparts, and in part because they do force you out of your comfort zone. A century into cinema’s history, that’s some accomplishment. (Takashi has a cameo in Hostel and his fingerprints are all over the infamous tendon scene.)

Hostel

Hostel takes a scenario straight out of Euro Trip. A couple of American backpackers (Jay Hernandez and Derek Richardson) and a new Icelandic friend, Oli (Eythor Gudjonsson) are getting their rocks off in Amsterdam when they hear whispers of the wild women of Bratislava, and before you can say ‘The Beach’ they head straight off to Slovakia to investigate.

Judging by the users’ boards at the internet movie database the Slovaks are not much impressed with how Roth has portrayed them and their native land. But that too is straight out of Euro Trip (or, if you prefer, the Transylvania of our collective imagination). He’s not exactly flattering about Americans either. Hostel has been called misogynist, but if you’ve seen Cabin Fever you’ll know he’s basically a misanthrope with a sick sense of humour. That allows him to do some unconscionable things to his characters – but it also allows the audience to watch with impunity, because we don’t really care about these jerks anyway.

I won’t give away the film’s twist – although if you’re a fan of this genre you probably already know that Harry Knowles of Ain’t It Cool News played a hand in its devising… something about a Thai website that appealed to Roth and his producer here, Quentin Tarantino. Those self-same genre fans will also know that there’s nothing new under the sun, and that the website was itself probably inspired by a story that has been filmed countless times before, The Most Dangerous Game. What goes around comes around. Speaking for myself, if these horror movies get any heavier, I’m going to be ready for some PG-13 cheap thrills sooner rather than later.

Tom Charity

View Details

More information about Hostel »

Critics' Reviews

Sight and Sound

HOSTEL confirms Roth as one of the brighter hopes for mainstream horror... His troubling climax lets us wallow in violent retribution

Uncut

It's devastatingly effective... It's hands-over-your-eyes horrible, toe-curlingly savage and, eventually, strangely haunting

Nigel Floyd, Time Out

After the flesh-eating horror of Cabin Fever, writer-director Eli Roth brings us a grisly tale of abduction and... read more on www.timeout.com

See all 4 Critics' Reviews »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 5 starsawsome

A customer from England , 19/03/2006

This movie makes 'devils Rejects' 'Wolf Creek' and all the other nex-gen video nasties look like fluffy cuddly kids films.

The 1st half of the film is a bit of a confusing mix of american road trip comedy films and soft porn but gradually your smile will drop as the film decends into a squalid,depraved nightmarish world of unthinkable torture and violence.

And this is where it gets good its one of those films thet is so disgusting that you find yourself laughing and reaching at the same time and when the end credit finally role your left staring at the screen in disbelief trying to comprehend what you've just seen.

It goes with out saying this is not for the faint hearted but for anyone else who grew up intrigued by banned video nasties of the 70's and 80's strap your self in your chair and prepare to witness the most unflinching grotesque powerhouse of a horror movie your ever likely to see.

  72 out of 92 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsit's a bad bad bad bad world

JOHN451 from HERTFORDSHIRE , 05/04/2006

For any fan of the horror genre this really is worth a look.The two male leads are convincing in their roles and it's hard not to develop empathy in their predicament.

This is not without fault however as it seems the middle part of the film is rushed and maybe needed 10 minutes to pad out the story.There were also times in this film when i really felt uncomfortable watching in the cinema,but i suppose that was the point!Definately not for the squeamish.this would've been banned during the 1980's video nasty era.

All in all well made,well acted by the whole cast, just very very wrong.

  44 out of 58 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsSickening!

A customer from N Wales , 02/05/2007

I have to say that is the only horror film ever (and i have seen a lot), to make me physically feel sick! This is credit to the film to make the events sickening and realistic. This really is pretty gruesome, but its not one of those silly unbelievable horrors. It starts off pretty run of the mill but keep watching for the gore in a similar vein to Saw. If you liked that you'll like this.

  36 out of 36 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsNot For The Faint Of Heart

trotsuk from LONDON [Highly rated reviewer] , 15/08/2006

Ok, here it is. I love horror films. The Exorcist, The Shining and The Dead Trilogy all sit highly in my all-time top twenty. The first time I saw John Carpenter's The Thing was when I was nine years old, sat in a giant carboard box I'd painted to look like a robot in the corner of my dad's lounge. I'd not seen anything quite like it. This was followed by such delights as An American Werewolf In London and The Howling. And from then on, Dr Who just didn't cut the mustard any more.

A deep love of horror films has remained with me my entire life. Perhaps it stems from serious de-sensitisation from an early age. After the absolute hayday of the horror film in the seventies, and into the eighties, unfortunately I feel that in the last decade or so Hollywood has been responsible for the serious dumbing-down of the modern horror film. Presumably money is at stake - a film will make more cash with a 15 rating than an 18 simply because more people will get in to see it. I know that these days you can get away with a lot more in a 15, but still. This has been compounded by a serious creative block, with the endless stream of rubbish dumbed-down re-makes of classic 70s horror films instead of fresh new ones.

But then, every once in a while, an independently financed gem comes along. Something truely original that grabs you by the balls and squeezes. Recently, often these now come from Korea, or Japan. Here's one that's American. Hostel is hostile. A deeply unsettlingly disturbingly brilliant horror. Perhaps even the most disturbing film I have ever seen, and i've seen them all. If you like this genre, I implore you to see this film. Just beware that it might linger on in your head for weeks afterwards. The horror, the horror...

  34 out of 40 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 2 starsGood Concept, but hyped up

Kleptomaniac from London , 23/06/2006

Hostel was hyped up beyond what it really was.

It was a good film concept, but at times seemed to be rushed and not really thought out.

It half shocked me, and the other half of the time I was thinking "what ridiculous nonsense".

The main reason I watched this film was because I like Jay Hernandez, from since I saw him act in Crazy/ Beautiful. You should definately see this film for the hype it drew about and some of the disgusting scenes, but be warned you'll either like it or totally dismiss it.

  21 out of 27 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 1 stara dismal piece of cinema

southerngirlupnorth from north england , 09/09/2006

Hostel fails on so many levels. It is badly directed, badly acted, badly scripted and has not one scene in which the viewer feels entirely engaged. Oh my god! they have gone to eastern Europe (where we know vampires lurk). Oh my god! there is torture via nude ladies (why would you get fished in? This is more a plea to American travellers who still don't understand prostitution and poverty in eastern Europe) Oh my god! The hero has changed from a total w***ker to James Bond who will save everyone from the bad Russian heavies who are waiting outside the abandoned warehouse. Oh my god! here is Scooby Doo.... not really, but the cartoon cliche and overbearing patronising tone of this 'horror' film has really put my back up.

  4 out of 5 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews