Skip over navigation

The Constant Gardener

Rated - 3.5 stars

The Constant Gardener: Ralph Fiennes and Rachel Weisz

Ralph Fiennes is Justin Quayle, the gardener of the title, and a typical John Le Carré semi-hero: a British diplomat so impeccably schooled he fancies good manners are synonymous with virtue. Yet there is hope for Justin. ‘Learn me’, commands Tessa (Rachel Weisz), a radical free spirit with whom he falls in love. Tessa cannot let injustice lie. There is much to keep her busy when she accompanies her husband to Kenya… but is her sudden death a crime of passion or political assassination?

Easy to see what attracted City of God director Fernando Mereilles to this hard-hitting, politically relevent material, but for all his film's estimable qualities – finely nuanced performances, a probing ethical schema, and the vivid sense of place – and despite the rave reviews it seems to be generating on both sides of the Atlantic, The Constant Gardener still feels like a good novel transplanted to the screen. The roots don't quite take.

The Constant Gardener: Rachel WeiszMereilles and sceenwriter Jeffrey Caine mirror the book’s elegant flashback structure, counterpointing Justin and Tessa's courtship and marriage with the aftermath of her death, and it's just about enough to make the story hold on an emotional level. Ralph Fiennes is very good at playing repressed Brits opening up to passionate women (The English Patient; The End of the Affair). He and Weisz make the most of their brief, intimate scenes. But her role feels more forced, in part because crucial life experiences (the loss of a child for example) are compressed into just a couple of minutes’ screen time.

As the plot thickens in the second half, the conspiracy whisks us on such a breathless whirligig ride – to London, the Netherlands, and northern Kenya, each sequence replete with intrigue and suspense – you begin to wonder if there wasn't a superior mini-series in here somewhere.

The Constant Gardener: Fiennes and WeiszThe close coterie of modern colonials – diplomats, businessmen and spies – is persuasive enough (Danny Huston, Gerald McSorley and Bill Nighy in a more serious role than usual) but by the time we get Pete Postlethwaite as an evangelical missionary out in the desert somewhere the movie’s credibility is on very thin ground. And that’s unfortunate when it’s dealing with such pressing (real) life and death issues as drug testing in the third world. By going the thriller route, and opting to end on a note of operatic romantic nihilism, the film's recasting of pharmaceutical companies as neo-colonial heavies can't help but seem glib. Hitchcock used to talk about the motor for thrillers being a McGuffin. In his anecdote one man asks another what he has under his arm. ‘A McGuffin,’ he replies. ‘It’s for shooting lions in the Scottish highlands.’

‘But there are no lions in the Scottish highlands,’ complains his perplexed companion.

‘Then that’s no McGuffin,’ he declares.

The Constant GardenerThe point is this: it doesn’t matter what the McGuffin is, that’s just a device for getting the job done. The audience don’t care about the McGuffin, they care about the characters.

I’m afraid that’s the case here too. Despite everyone’s best intentions, and despite cinematographer Cesar Charlone’s impassioned response to the African locales, The Constant Gardener is a tragic love story; it reduces the plight of Africa’s much abused poor to the status of a McGuffin. If you are really concerned about how globalization is impacting the world’s poor, don’t miss the devastating recent documentary Darwin's Nightmare.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about The Constant Gardener »

Critics' Reviews

USA Today

THE CONSTANT GARDENER is a masterwork of suspense, romance and political intrigue. It is a taut and gripping thriller that dazzles the eyes and engages the brain in a way that few recent films have come close to approaching.

Movieline's Hollywood Life

THE CONSTANT GARDENER, a thriller with something on its mind, confirms the talents of Brazilian director Fernando Meirelles

Rolling Stone

Meirelles emerges with one of the year's best and most provocative movies. Long after it's over, you still feel its sting.

See all 4 Critics' Reviews »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 4 starsGripping tragic love story hidden behind a propaganda thriller

wreeve wreeve from London NW3 [Highly rated reviewer] , 26/11/2005

I didn't know what to expect but this movie hit lots of my favourite buttons. Fiennes and Weisz are outstanding, and are supported by Bill Nye (always excellent - here the exact opposite of his Love Actually role), Pete Postlethwaite, and other familiar faces.

The ostensible plot revolves around nasty capitalist pharma companies killing innocent Africans, in cahoots with the naughty British government. Amidst many beautiful settings (in London and in Africa), there is the occasional overwraught scene by the famous Brazilian director. There are marriages, mistresses and MI6 - complete with references to Bond.

But despite the minor gripes, overall the story is compelling, the (white, British) characters charismatic, and your initial ebb and ultimate flow are completely controlled thru-out in a master performance. One to watch for 2006 Ocars.

  88 out of 96 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsAnother Master piece

Remmy from Oxfordshire , 17/11/2005

This movie is absolutely amazing, it is simply an exercise in trying to open people's eyes.

Politics aside, this movie is gripping in all aspects. Ralph Fiennes is on the highest marks as Justin Quayle — he really makes you care about what his character is searching for. Rachel Weisz, though not given the biggest part, is great. The supporting cast, such as Bill Nighy, is also quite amazing. Not to mention how great the cinematography is.

The scenes in Kenya are amazing — the people, the life, and the natural beauty. The film is a full throttle thriller, but is also based in a very human story of how we need to realize some of the injustices that happen every day and do what we can to change it.

Being of Kenyan descent, the movie moved me to tears. The seriousness to which the director shoots the scenes totally lets the audience get what he is trying to potray.

  59 out of 72 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starAlot like gardening...BORING!

Mbub from Westbury, Wilts , 30/04/2007

This film is like a documentry on Africa. I could only watch 30 mins of this and most of that was in fast forward. I had heard so much about this movie, but when I came to watch it most of what I had heard was very wrong. I didn't get it, not what I had expected at all.

  56 out of 68 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starshigh expectations were let down (spoilers)

A customer from London , 16/11/2005

I went to see this with high expectations, remembering the impactful experience that was watching City of God in the cinema. Having read a couple of favourable reviews also helped to build up expectations. I found it a very mixed bag. Fernando Meirelles is an impressive director, but I can never really set aside the feeling while watching his films that I am seeing a slightly 'sophisticated advertising' version of things. His prolonged experience in directing adverts in Brazil has left too strong a mark, for my taste. He also has a good go at directing a mostly British cast in a more emotional, warts and sweat approach that can feel quite brazilian. But the result is mixed. Sometimes I believe the characters are living real and intimate relationships on screen. But most of the time there is for me a sense of awkwardness, as if people were trying to be more relaxed and real on screen than they are really managing. The fact that the director doesn't speak English as a first language doesn't help. He can't really tell when the actors are not sounding believable. As a result they aren't, for most of the film. I also really miss seeing a fully three dimensional African character. It seems like only Caucasian people in the film have any depth, while all the black people become more or less undifferentiated faces in the crowd. There's one black guy that has a bit more screen space, but his only depth is the 'discovery' that his character is gay. This may well be a problem of the novel, but it could have been changed in the script. Having said all this, the subject matter is still quite interesting. It's better to see someone having a go at questioning corporate lack of human decency than not. Some of the images in the film are arresting. The music is really good when it goes for the African sounds, if a bit overdone. Not good in the first love scene of the main characters, with much bleached out stocking pulling over soft jazzy sounds, quite cringe worthy in my book. The actors also seem a bit embarrassed. They may win Oscars, which I'm sure will compensate.

  32 out of 42 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

* * * This review contains spoilers * * *

Rated - 2 starsTruly dissapointing

Ethendras from Kettering [Highly rated reviewer] , 17/12/2007

I was really dissapointed with this film. It's in the same kind of bracket as Erin Brokovich, ie mulitnational screws the general masses, except this time it's about Africa. The storyline gets going too quickly without really creating a decent background or exploring the central characters. As such you don't particularly care that his wife dies. Also it's use of a non-linear storyline isn't directed well and not used effectively. It doesn't explain what the films about until too far into the film (when it starts talking about the Despraxa). Just too vague in places for my liking and directed badly. Complete dissapointment considering it's supposed to be a great film.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 5 starsWow, there should be more like this - Fiction based on Reality!?! You decide.......

A customer from England , 06/09/2006

This film might be a romantic spy thriller, but the fact is the message it is based on is very real, very true. It is the reality of what goes on in this world with the pharmaceutical companies - we are living in a world where corruption and vested interests are the mainstream of life....

Watch it and believe it... Oh, and don't forget to enjoy it!

  5 out of 6 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews