Skip over navigation

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest

Rated - 3.5 stars

Pirates of the Caribbean

Elizabeth Swann: 'I know there will come a moment when you will have the chance to do the right thing.'

Jack Sparrow: 'I love those moments. I like to wave at them as they pass by.'

I can't imagine what Tom Hollander has against Keira Knightley, but after his oozy proposal to the poor girl in Pride & Prejudice, here he is ruining her wedding to Orlando Bloom and clapping her in irons. Hollander plays an agent for the British East India company, and is much the most nefarious of the film's villains, even if octo-pussed Davy Jones and his pet monster the Kraken are reputedly more odious.

The question hanging over Dead Man's Chest is how Johnny Depp's Captain Jack Sparrow fits into such infamous company. Not only did the jolly old rogue steal the first movie out from under ostensible hero Will Turner, he even contrived to make off with the moral high ground. Even so, when all is said and done he's still a pirate, surely: not just a free spirit, but a brigand, a liar and a thief?

At the beginning of this sequel Sparrow's crew are a tad disenchanted - it seems they haven't engaged in much looting and pillaging since reclaiming the Black Pearl from the late, unlamented Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush).

Captain Jack has lost his bearings. His compass - which usually points the way to his heart's desire - is all in a spin. Whether this is because he harbours a secret desire to go straight, as Elizabeth claims, or whether it's a not-so-secret desire for Elizabeth herself that is muddying the waters we are left to figure out for ourselves. But the movie very cleverly extends Ms Swann's romantic illusions about piracy to include Jack, setting up a tricky romantic triangle for the third (and final?) installment next year. Do we want to see her comfortably married to the dashing but dull Will or sailing off with the debauched and dissolute Jack?

Pirates of the Caribbean

Retaining all the elements that made the first film such a hit, both in front of and behind the cameras, Dead Man's Chest is a highly professional sequel that probably deserves its record breaking box office. What it loses in novelty value it just about makes up for in some truly gob-smacking set pieces.

I'm not usually much of a special effects fanatic, but Davy Jones - Bill Nighy unrecognizable behind a computer generated cephalopod face and a Scottish accent - is, well, 'lifelike' wouldn't be the right word, but brilliantly animated. It takes state of the art technology and a wicked imagination to combine for such a creature, and then an inspired showman to conceive of Davy playing an organ in the bowels of the Flying Dutchman with the tentacles that make up his 'beard'.

Other highlights include a rollicking three way sword fight played out on a runaway watermill and a slapstick escape from a tribe of politically incorrect cannibals.

Entertaining as it is, this breathless, over-extended sequel feels more like a theme park ride than the original, simply because the first film held to a strong narrative line and this one stitches together different threads with more energy than sense.

Pirates of the Caribbean

Everybody is roped into a quest for the contents of Davy Jones' locker, which turns out to be his heart, but it's by no means clear what they would do with it once they had it, or why Davy keeps it there in the first place. You get the feeling they're making this up as they go along. Not that that's a bad thing, necessarily: Buster Keaton, Charlie Chaplin and Jackie Chan have all operated in the same way with considerable success. Let's just hope they can come up with an ending.

Tom Charity

View Details

More information about Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 3 starsDid I Leave the Gas On?

R3DZ3D from Farnham , 13/07/2006

I thoroughly enjoyed the first 'Pirates' film, but 'Pirates 2' leaves you with a faint suspicion that maybe you should have got more out of it.

Whilst it could never be accused of failing to deliver one spectacular action sequence after another, what it sadly lacks is continuity. You are rushed from one death defying and in many cases nigh on impossible stunt to the next, whilst dropping in a tasty character development to keep you wanting more.

At well over 2 hours long it still feels rushed, as if they need to fit in as much as possible. In this sense, it is very like other "second in the trilogy" films, and ends with a suitable cliff hanger to keep you salivating till next summer.

Despite the bumpy ride it ticks all the boxes for fantastic set pieces, beautiful scenery and swashbuckling action. Johnny Depp is as over the top as ever, (and brilliantly so), and Bill Nighy provides a very suitable counterpart in tentacle faced Davy Jones, complete with his crew of aquatic monstrosities.

The script contains some genuinely funny moments, and plenty of intriguing references to make you want to watch the original again. All in all, a good way to pass an evening, but don’t go expecting any dramatic changes from the original.

  37 out of 40 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsMore like walking the plank

MJL from Coventry [Highly rated reviewer] , 16/07/2006

Well what can i say, just seen the movie. Good Film but only good, definate no where near as good as the first, the problem take ages to get going and the best bits are the set pieces which were to be expected. The first 20 mins i was thinking 'this is boring' then suddenly decides to remembers this is a action,adventure,escapism movie. This movie yoyo's from being excellent to boring as in proceeds. Johnny Depp is the movie, as the best thing in the movie is when he is on screen. Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley just do a reasonable job but are left in the shade. Also if they cut 20 mins of this movie it be so much more enjoyable, just as the movie goes on it drags and drags as if it does not know how to finish. Davy Jones character is interesting but does not really go anywhere, well acted, but instantly forgettable. As i said the set pieces make the film, without them and Johnny Depp this movie would be like Cutthroat Island.

  30 out of 34 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starA let down!

Scrappywoo from North Yorkshire , 06/09/2006

After thoroughly enjoying the first edition of ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ and watching it several times, I was thoroughly excited at the prospect of another instalment.

Unfortunately I was very disappointed and the others in our group felt exactly the same.

The storyline and humour in the first movie were key elements and supported the excellent effects, set and cast of characters. The latest edition seemed to lean on "over the top effects", silly sea creatures and "weirder-than-needed" characters on Davy Jones's vessel.

Yes, the set and characters were overall still good. There were still some funny moments, but it was really nowhere near the impact of the first film and does not entice me to want to see the next edition. While it may have been a reasonable way of spending 2 hours on a rainy day, I felt very let down.

  21 out of 28 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starGratuitous and Cynical

maxwurr from Middlesex [Highly rated reviewer] , 24/02/2007

There is always a danger of artistic snobbery when it comes to Hollywood blockbusters, but before I slate this miserable excuse for entertainment I must make it clear that I watched and quite enjoyed the first Pirates of the Caribbean film (with a few minor reservations). This sequel, though, sums up everything that is regrettable about the profit-driven motives of Hollywood. Rip out the cartoonish effects and almost non-stop frantic chases, fights and generally goonery and anything resembling substance (or indeed, plot or comedy) disappears quicker than a fart in a hurricane. I very rarely give up on a film before the end, but neither me nor my wife (who loves Johnny Depp as much as anyone alive) could actually be bothered to sit through the whole of this piece of monumental drivel - we bailed out after just over an hour, feeling genuinely aggrieved at having given up so much of our Friday evening. A very expensive piece of garbage (although the squid head man is pretty cool).

  28 out of 48 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 2 starsTedious, unsatisfying but inoffensive

A customer from London, England , 05/06/2007

Visually stunning, but it's pretty tedious stuff. 30 mins too long, and substance, characters and plot are nearly completely abandoned in favour of chase-scenes, theatrical fighting and much silliness.

Great if you're under ten, but not much to keep adults interested. It annoyingly finishes halfway through, paving the way for more of the same in 'At World's End'. The impressive cast is capable of far more than this rubbish.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 4 starsgood

A customer from bedford , 06/09/2007

this a good film

worth of renting it

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews