Skip over navigation

Running With Scissors

Rated - 2.5 stars

Running with Scissors

Augusten Burroughs' memoir has been at or near the top of the New York Times best seller list for non-fiction these past 127 weeks. Call me crazy, but I wonder if it would pass the Oprah veracity test if it had been published in the post-James Frey era. This tale of a camp 13-year-old boy adopted by his divorced mother's blithely uninhibited therapist, Dr Finch (Brian Cox) makes the traumatic childhood in Tarnation look like Little House on the Prairie.

The cast of loonier-than-life characters includes Augusten's neurotic mom, Deirdre (Annette Bening), who styles herself an angry feminist poet and craves the acclaim to match, and who shortly falls hook, line and sinker for Finch's gospel of self-actualisation through prescription drugs and regular bowel movements.

The doctor's wife, Agnes (Jill Clayburgh), mopes around like Lurch in The Addams Family, eating kibble and cleaning up after their two daughters: the favourite, Hope (Gwyneth Paltrow), who converses with her cat and turns to the bible to guide her meal choices; and Natalie (Evan Rachel Wood), who likes to play doctor with her dad's electro-shock machine. Then there's the other adopted son, Neil (a moustached and Americanised Joseph Fiennes), a 35-year-old homosexual schizophrenic who becomes Augusten's first lover.

Running with Scissors

But it's Finch himself who takes the biscuit. He maintains a private masturbatorium next door to his office, checks his stools for messages from God, and thinks nothing of supplying drugs that will put Augusten into a coma, thus sparing him from the torments of public education.

By contrast, young Augusten (Joseph Cross) is almost pathetically, preternaturally normal, an innocent bystander who somehow emerges unscathed from all the madness around him, absorbing only their self-absorption.

Running with Scissors

The film is written and directed by Ryan Murphy, whose TV show Nip/Tuck is a good deal more incisive and cutting than this over-cooked, re-heated satire of 70s 'Me Decade' solipsism. To be sure it has its moments - how could it not? - but the black comedy peters out and the drama just stagnates. Bening and Clayburgh are too good for the freaks they're asked to play. You might ask what made these women they way they are - but the movie never thinks to.

Ironically, even though Finch is a monstrous and obviously barmy patriarch, the film somehow ends up inadvertently validating his narcissistic mantra: Just let it all out. It might get you on the NY Times best-seller lists after all.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about Running With Scissors »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 2 starsDark comedy minus the comedy!!

balearicbayes balearicbayes from Denny [Highly rated reviewer] , 19/12/2007

This film had the potential to be on par with the likes of The Royal Tenenbaums and numerous other movies dealing with dysfunctional families, but it never quite reaches that level. There is just too much tragedy in the lead characters life for even the slightly funny bits to raise a smile.

I found myself more concerned with the fact that this film is based on Augusten Burroughs' personal memoirs, and alarmed that all these events actually happened to this poor kid!!!

There is a couple of redeeming qualities though- one is Annette Bening who acts her socks off as the crazy mum, and the second is that Augusten survived his traumatising childhood to become a success!!!

Think I might go back and read the book instead!!!

  66 out of 66 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsDysfunctional families

A customer from London, England , 31/12/2006

The opening scene is great and the first fifteen minutes or so are promising, but after that the film slumps into dreary gloom and doom from which it never emerges. The film is based on the memoirs of the American author Augusten Burroughs in which he charts his childhood and adolescence as the only son of dysfunctional parents. His father is an alcoholic, his untalented mother yearns to be a famous poet and recites her work to her adoring son. When her psychotic episodes begin to take over, her husband walks out and the young Augusten is sent to live with the equally dysfunctional family of his mother’s dubious psychiatrist who likes to get his hands on his patients’ trust funds and dishes out tranquillizers as if they were biscuits. I hoped for some denouement in which the psychiatrist is proved to have been responsible for everyone’s mental deterioration and gets his just deserts, but no. There is no shape to the story, in fact there’s very little story, and no sign of any hope for Augusten’s future. Do we care? Well, there were one or two moments when I felt sorry for him but that’s all. I certainly couldn’t empathise with any of the other characters, with perhaps the exception of Augusten’s father. It is a very depressing film that goes nowhere.

  30 out of 36 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsIrritating

breatheasier [Highly rated reviewer] , 22/07/2007

I rented this film after friends had commented on how great the book was... i wish I'd read the book instead.

Augusten Burroughs is a teenager raised by unstable parents, who's eventual split leads his mother to hand him over to her psychiatrist, a man who's family is as questionable as his medical practices.

The film isn'y entirely bad but I did get very bored about three quarters of the way through. I found most of the characters very irritating particularly Dierdre, the mother (played superbly by Annette Benning) who I had absolutely no sympathy for at all.

I wouldn't go as far as saying avoid this film but there are better films out there to rent first.

  7 out of 8 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsLovely Film

A customer from Leeds , 30/08/2007

Terrific acting by the entire cast, great editing especially when cutting between characters while each shows their individual way of dealing with rage. It has a gentle humour, not a comedy, but not a depressing examination of mental illness or grim childhood either. If you enjoyed Breakfast on Pluto, you'll enjoy this, both have a very similar directorial style and lead character.

  6 out of 6 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 0 starsABSOLUTE RUBBISH!

A customer from London , 05/01/2009

Boring, dull, and almost makes you lose the will to live. I had to turn it off after 15 minutes as it was utter dross.

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 1 starA great book ruined

A customer from east sussex england , 07/09/2007

Dull, dull,dull!

What a shame that this film adaptation of a stimulating, thought provoking - and fun - book was boring and dull.

It failed completely to capture the mood of the time (the 1970s) and recreated none of the kookiness that permeated the book.

I think one reason is that it was a first film for the director who had only directed TV (e.g. Nip Tuck) previously. It should have been done by someone who had nothing to prove or a fearless newcomer like Cam Archer.

The other glaring problem is this; despite a good adult cast, and the 6 year old Augustine was near perfect, they cast a 20 year old to play a boy aged 12 to 14! Why do they do this? With the best will in the world one can not suspend belief enough to accept this adult as a vunerable, slightly effeminate, adolescent who's life is in constant turmoil due to the weird lives of all those around him.

A great disappointment.

  4 out of 4 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews