Skip over navigation

Conversations with Other Women

Rated - 2.5 stars

Conversations with Other Women

A middle-aged man and a woman - Aaron Eckhart and Helena Bonham Carter - meet at a wedding. He's flirtatious. She plays along. Her husband is a cardiologist back in London. She came over to New York at the last minute, an alternate bridesmaid for a friend she used to know. The man says he's seen her before: he has a picture of her reading a book on a summer's day somewhere. He remembers coming up and dragging her away to the picnic - he can even describe what she was wearing. But what was the book, she wants to know?

There's a twist here you might see coming. And there's a gimmick you can't miss. Director Hans Canosa and writer Gabrielle Zevin have opted to shoot the film on two cameras, with one trained on him and the other on her, then in post-production they've split the screen in two and put them beside each other. Occasionally one half is taken with a flashback.

Split-screen is noting new of course. Abel Gance's silent epic Napoléon used three screens in 1927, Doris Day and Rock Hudson chatted side by side in their bathtubs in Pillow Talk (1959), The Boston Strangler, The original Thomas Crown Affair, Jackie Brown, 24 and numerous Brian de Palma movies have used the technique liberally, usually to generate suspense.

Conversations with Other Women

It's much more unusual to see a movie in split-screen throughout, but again, not without precedent: seven years ago Mike Figgis made what may be the ultimate split-screen movie in Timecode, quartering the screen and shooting four unbroken takes that each lasted an hour and a half.

The use of split-screen in Conversations with Other Women is an irritating distraction at first, accentuating the film's blah visuals and arch dialogue. Presumably it's meant to illustrate the dichotomy between the sexes, a man's perception of a conversation and a woman's, with the viewer allowed to edit the shots for him or her self.

Personally I'd rather have the power to fire the jittery cameraman and start over with Vittorio Storaro. I don't mind a filmmaker selecting the shots - that's part of his job description - as long as he has something worth showing.

Conversations with Other Women

As the film progresses, we see how the device might also mirror the (unnamed) characters' emotional separation, from each other, certainly, and more importantly from their younger selves in the flashbacks.

Still, if it's going to be more than an academic conceit the film needs to make these characters real to us, and that never quite happens: the performances are too studied and brittle, the writing too cute, the flashbacks altogether too superficial. This film doesn't feel like a movie, it feels like a play. Not an uninteresting play, but a play all the same. Maybe multi-dimensionality has to come from within.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about Conversations with Other Women »

Critics' Reviews

Rating of 3 
	  stars out of 5 Anna Smith, Time Out

Much like Before Sunset, this drama focuses on a real-time conversation between an intelligent couple with an... read more on www.timeout.com

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 1 starThis was awful!!!!

A customer from SE London , 09/06/2007

An extremely boring movie....filmed with a split screen the entire time and only featuring 2 people's conversation the entire time???!! Who thinks up these story lines?

Honestly - don't bother!

  41 out of 54 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsKnow what you're in for

Ria Llewellyn from Swansea, Wales , 27/11/2007

The basic advice I'll give to anyone thinking of renting this is - know what you're renting. If you're expecting a hugely dramatic storyline with twists and turns, you're not going to get it. This film is an exploration of two characters, and often you might find yourself asking 'what if?' throughout the film. Yes the splitscreen is a bit strange at first, but no it's not useless - it's used for a reason, and as another reviewer said, being able to see both of the character's facial expressions and reactions throughout the whole of the film really adds to the emotion. A nice exploration of two people's worlds connecting, and a nice easy film to watch. But not for those who like a big bang at the end!

  25 out of 28 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsDisappointing.

granita from Farnham [Highly rated reviewer] , 31/08/2007

This should have been my kind of thing. I like 'relationship' films. However, I found this rather tedious. Using dual screens is interesting from a technical point of view, and must have been quite difficult for the actors -and the director, who did the editing.

While Helena Bonham Carter - having such a strong screen presence and watchable face - is ideally suited to such a medium, she failed to convince me that she was in love with her co-star. And vice versa.

Split screens for an entire feature length film? I don't think it worked in this movie.

  18 out of 18 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 0 starsgarbage

A customer from Wilmslow, England , 09/10/2007

An infuriating film about 2 people whom you will quickly learn to despise,made all the more irritating by the pointless use of split screen technique throughout the film. An evening entirely wasted. Do yourself a favour,do the washing up.

  16 out of 23 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 3 starsDisappointing.

granita from Farnham [Highly rated reviewer] , 31/08/2007

This should have been my kind of thing. I like 'relationship' films. However, I found this rather tedious. Using dual screens is interesting from a technical point of view, and must have been quite difficult for the actors -and the director, who did the editing.

While Helena Bonham Carter - having such a strong screen presence and watchable face - is ideally suited to such a medium, she failed to convince me that she was in love with her co-star. And vice versa.

Split screens for an entire feature length film? I don't think it worked in this movie.

  18 out of 18 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 1 starANNOYING!!!

A customer from London , 24/10/2007

Aaaaaarh!!!! This film is just SO annoying. The dual affect/split screen (apologies if not correct technical term) camera work as people describe is not arty or adds anything to the film, it is just totally and utterly annoying, pretentious and totally gets in the way of you focusing on what’s going on- as you are focusing on how deeply irritating this camera affect is! I was hoping it was only something at the beginning of the film but its all the way through, actually at least until half way through- as I fell asleep.

Helen BC is very irritating and both main characters are totally unsympathetic, its a mundane non story with boring characters with a desperate attempt to spice things up through this stupid camera work which destroys anything vaguely, minutely decent about this film. Please don’t waste your time, just look out of your window for two hours, you will see things going on far more interesting than in this film, and at least it wont be split in two!

  9 out of 10 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews


* The Amazon.co.uk prices on our site are updated every 24 hours and may not be up to date at the time you view this page.
To see the current new and "new and used" Amazon.co.uk prices, please click on the Buy button.