Skip over navigation

Water

Rated - 3.5 stars

Water

India, 1938. A dozen widows live together in penury on an ashram in Banares. According to Hindu tradition because their husbands are dead, they are themselves only half alive. Officially they are prohibited from further contact with men (save for an arranged marriage with a younger brother-in-law). In reality, the only way they can survive is by prostituting one of their number. Kalyani (the striking Lisa Ray) is in her 20s, still young and beautiful, and so it is understood that she is their breadwinner.

Because child brides are not uncommon in India, there are child widows too. Chuyia (Sarala) is an eight-year-old, a naturally mischievous urchin with her shaved head and big grin. She is confused about what she's doing here and happily oblivious to the fact that she is destined to spend her entire adult life in this monastic environment.

Several of the women take an interest in her, especially when it comes to discipline and punishment. The most sympathetic is middle-aged Shakuntala (Seema Biswas, from Bandit Queen), struggling to make some sort of peace with this unjust system. But Chuyia and the kind-hearted Kalyani become firm friends, and gradually the child comes to understand the rules and traditions which govern this strange household - as well as the hypocrisies and sexism that hold everyone in their place.

Water

Chuyia is instrumental in introducing Kalyani to Narayan (John Abrahams), a modern free-thinker and a follower of Gandhi, and she observes as he follows her, courts her, and eventually urges her to become his wife. Even in 1938 there is no law to prevent it, only deeply entrenched custom and prejudice. Ironically this masculine element throws the picture off balance; instead of honing the theme this dewy romance is too pretty and conventional, as if Mehta's heart wasn't quite in it.

Water is the third part of Deepa Mehta's controversial 'elemental trilogy', after Fire and Earth. Each film stands apart from the others. There are no common characters, only common characteristics: they all challenge taboos around sex and religion. Fire, in 1996, touched on lesbian desire. Earth was a tragedy set against the Partition. As a bonus, we get to see how the Indian ex-pat's filmmaking matures and deepens over a decade.

Water

Mehta began making Water in 2000, but protestors successfully shut it down. Angry that an international filmmaker (and a woman) should want to air such issues in public, they burned down some sets and even threatened her life. Four years later she successfully remounted the production, but only after relocating it to Sri Lanka. That in itself suggests the film is more relevant than we might hope. As a movie, it's beautiful to look at (the exquisitely dappled cinematography is by Giles Nuttgens), soulful, sensitive, and a mite predictable.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

Watch now (£2.49)

More information about Water »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 2 starsSlow, Serious, Sad, Worthy, Beautiful

RealMeringue from London , 16/06/2007

I want to love the films of Deepha Mehta, I really do. I loath the Shiv Sena and my heart goes out to all the unfortunates, and all the women subjugated by 'religion' (so-called). But Water - like Earth and Fire before it - is a deeply ponderous film with dainty, subtle, lovely imagery but no substance, no story, no characters, and it's not at all appealing in its execution. The acting is fine - the little one especially - and the cinematography is super, but one is bored when one should not be. In some ways it's very Bollywood - the 'spectacled' intellectual; sensitive he is, if not quick on his feet, the hooker with the heart of gold - soooo happy to sacrifice. Mehta both hates and loves the Hindu psychosis; therein lies the problem; the contradiction.

In summary, a worthy film that should be made and a story that should be told, but not a well communicated film.

  20 out of 25 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsexcellent

kumar from DERBY [Highly rated reviewer] , 21/07/2008

brilliant execution and touching film. opens the eyes to the miseries suffered by women in the name of religion. A must see for film lovers who really love good films

  4 out of 4 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starswater

A customer from harrow england , 11/10/2007

This film is not what i expected but its ok to watch once.

  3 out of 4 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsWATER by deepa mehta

blissful from mid glamorgan , 02/08/2008

This film was an enchanting piece of work. The word that came to mind is enchanting. It is like a fairy tale with a twist. The film was executed flawlessly and to me did flow like water in its pace. The main character of this film were so well developed that it left one with the happy fond memories in the story, despite whatever consequences came about in the film.

I LOVED THIS FILM SO MUCH I WATCHED IT 3 TIMES! Maybe 4

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 4 starsGreat movie

A customer from England , 09/05/2007

Really enjoyed watching this really touching movie which shows you what it was like to be widow in those old times. Its not the typical bollywood movie & the acting was done well by all. It was such a shame for the little girl.

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 3 starsok

A customer from England , 17/08/2007

I thought the film was average. I'd expected it to be better. The main storyline was good but it was a bit slow and could have easily been cut short.

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews