Skip over navigation

Ocean's Thirteen

Rated - 3 stars

Ocean's Thirteen

If Danny Ocean and co frittered away a lot of their gloss in the irritatingly frivolous Ocean's Twelve, Thirteen restores much of the original luster. It's a stylish, confident caper movie that cruises along for two hours without breaking into a sweat.

The crew's second reunion is occasioned by the collapse of an ailing Reuben (Elliott Gould), cheated out of a partnership in a new Vegas hotel by the ruthless casino magnate Willie Banks (Al Pacino).

To square things up, Danny and the boys scheme to infiltrate 'The Bank', rig the roulette wheels, the tables and the slots, and see to it that the high rollers invited to opening night carry off millions in winnings. At the same time, they mean to ensure the egomaniac Banks fails to earn another coveted 'Five Diamond' rating for his establishment, and relieve him of his precious previous prizes.

Anyone who found Twelve too complicated for its own good will be relieved to learn that having laid it out, this time director Steven Soderbergh and his screenwriters stick to the plan and play it relatively straight.

Ocean's Thirteen

This is Soderbergh's ninth feature film in seven years, and while you better believe the challenges are technical, not intellectual, he shuffles the deck with the aplomb of someone who knows he's got aces up his sleeve.

Actually, with more than a dozen players in rotation, a better Vegas analogy might be a roulette wheel. The trick is to keep everyone in motion without letting the thing spin out of control, and that Soderbergh accomplishes through a barrage of short, snappy scenes, breezily distinguished through adept shifts in visual texture and location, and propelled by David Holmes' retro musical cues.

Without any romantic involvement for Danny or Rusty (Tess - Julia Roberts - and Isabel - Catherine Zeta Jones - are the only notable drop-outs, but they're surely missed), George Clooney and Brad Pitt hone their own affectionate double act, finishing each other's thoughts (and the thought after that one); even waxing nostalgic about the Sands of time. 'You're the Morcambe and Wise of thieves,' notes an approving Eddie Izzard, to general consternation all round.

Ocean's Thirteen

But if anyone can stake a claim to it, this third outing belongs to Matt Damon's Linus, by a nose - the outrageously false one he wears to seduce Banks' personal assistant, an improbably easy Ellen Barkin. A stunning 53-year-old, she at least seems to have worked out how to resist gravitational pull, though the character, Abigail Sponder, is a pretty flimsy counterweight to the inveterate guying going on.

As for Pacino (Barkin's Sea of Love partner, many moons ago) he's every inch the bronzed, manicured bully. You couldn't fault his performance, but iconically-speaking, the star of Serpico, Dog Day Afternoon and Heat belongs in a different universe. I'm thinking they should have got Warren Beatty to play Banks - he played Bugsy Siegel after all - or maybe George Segal, come to that. Someone whose reputation doesn't promise fireworks this suave but utterly superficial entertainment cannot possibly deliver.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about Ocean's Thirteen »

Critics' Reviews

Rating of 3 
	  stars out of 5 David Jenkins, Time Out

The ties are off and the collars are out for this breezy third entry in the slick crime caper serial in which the... read more on www.timeout.com

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 4 starsLucky for us there's a 13.. ...

PaulaWestwood from Ashton-Under-Lyne [Highly rated reviewer] , 08/06/2007

Though the high tide for Oceans was probably the first encounter , Oceans 12 was perfectly good, and this is no exception.

It is a slick, cool movie peppered with neat characters and another 'rip-off the big boys' plot that has you playing along on the wrong side for perhaps the right reasons.

Long at 2 hours, but definately worth the gamble, recommended.

  38 out of 39 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 0 starsdire

richard [Highly rated reviewer] , 13/11/2007

this franchise just gets worse- how can such a good cast make for such a crap movie

  26 out of 26 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsbetter than 12

alexandra s from newcastle , 06/11/2007

was unsure about this one as i loved oceans 11 but 12 was an utter dissapointment, words cant describe how bad it was. that said i was pleasently surprised by this film! the plot was much more like 11 and there were lots of things to laugh at (affleck in mexico!!!) it was clever like 11 but some bits were a tad unbelievable like the drill.

its a shame 12 had to ruin the trilogy! can we have a box set of just 11 n 13 please!!

  26 out of 35 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsBetter than 12. Not Better than 11.

Chris Johnston from Isle of Wight, England , 21/06/2007

But wasn't that a given? Ocean's 11 was a fun, slickly made 'flick' that people young and old can enjoy. Oceans's 12 was a dire mess, not worthy of one star (it was clearly rushed into production with little thought or planning- the actors all felt like they were simply filling contract obligations).

But getting back to the film at hand... Oceans 13. Yes; they're back in Vegas. Julia Roberts isn't here, playing herself. And Michale Corleone himself's been added as the films villian. So why didn't I enjoy this film more?

I guess it just comes down to 'sequel-itis'. And by that I mean this film is like Ocean's 11 but not as good. Not as funny. Not as clever. Not amazingly intresting to watch.

Let's hope that 'contractual obligations' don't pull us back for Ocean's 14.

  19 out of 21 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 3 starsAs everyone else says; better than 12 (not as good as 11)

A customer from Newcastle upon Tyne , 29/01/2008

If you liked 11 you'll like this one.

We watched it and thought it was a pleasant enough movie to watch BUT we both turned to each other after half an hour or so and said the same. It just tries to cram too much information at you in a short time you wonder whether its all going to come together - or would we realise what was important to the plot? So generally a bit difficult to keep up.

I know it was supposed to be quick, racy and punchy but we felt we were a little removed from it because of this.

However, it does all come together before the end and leaves a much improved after-taste after 12 had soured the very good 11.

Just as an aside; I wish I was as cool as Clooney or Pitt - sadly I'll just have to settle for being a looney and half-witt! Never mind!

  3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 3 starsBit dissapointing!

Munkymagic from Shrewsbury , 22/04/2008

As a masive fan of Al Pacino there is not enough of him in it or George to be fair. It does not posess the flair and fun of the first in the triology and therefore what made Oceans 11 good viewing has become too serious in my opinion. Its still worth a look though just for some George smoldering if nothing else!

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews


* The Amazon.co.uk prices on our site are updated every 24 hours and may not be up to date at the time you view this page.
To see the current new and "new and used" Amazon.co.uk prices, please click on the Buy button.