Skip over navigation

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

Rated - 3 stars

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

It's a difficult age: going into his fifth year at Hogwart's, young Potter is at the mercy of his hormones. He's having trouble sleeping, the Dursleys want no more to do with him, and when the Ministry for Magic threatens to expel him from school after an unlicensed public display of sorcery, it feels like the whole world is against him.

That threat is averted with the timely intervention of Dumbledore (Michael Gambon). But the Ministry refuses to accept Harry's claim that He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named is back on the scene. The Minister, Fudge (Robert Hardy), dispatches a new teacher of Defence Against the Dark Arts, Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton), a giggly disciplinarian in pink who quickly undermines the head master's authority and imposes a new autocratic regime as Hogwart's High Inquisitor. Meanwhile Harry is plagued with visions that seem to come direct from the mind of Voldemort himself.

At 870 pages, 'The Order of the Phoenix' is JK Rowling's longest book, and by general agreement not her best. It's a bridging work, and, at least until the climax, there's not a lot going on of vital importance to the saga as a whole. Director David Yates and screenwriter Michael Goldenberg (Peter Pan) have been more ruthless with the red ink than most of their predecessors, for which movie fans should be grateful even if some readers are bound to disagree. In fact, at 138 minutes this is the shortest of the Potter movies to date.

It's also the most sombre in a series that has been darkening as its heroes mature, beginning with a scary 'mugging' in a dimly-lit underpass and ending with an effectively staged battle between the forces of good and evil in the cavernous, black tiled Department of Mysteries.

Professor Umbridge is the main order of business, and a rare instance where the filmmakers have departed radically from Rowling's description: hardly the short, flabby, toad-like woman in the book, Imelda Staunton (Vera Drake) is flighty and birdlike; she rather reminded me of HRH the Queen, though I suspect there's an echo of The Iron Lady in the way she pronounces her cruel diktats with an exaggeratedly feminine sweetness.

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

This despicable, petty government functionary masks her prejudice and sadism in the rhetoric of blind loyalty. Even so, as villains go, Umbridge is a poor substitute for You Know Who. At the end of the day, she's a rotten teacher, but we've all survived one or two of them I'm sure. The truth is, Umbridge is a distraction from the big picture, but for long stretches she's allowed to dominate this episode.

The Order of the Phoenix doesn't amount too much either, although Gary Oldman has a couple of nice moments (and a very dashing wavy hair-do) as Sirius Black. In general it's left to Harry and Dumbledore to mount an effective opposition, with Potter turning magic teacher at Hermione's urging to train his classmates for the inevitable, but still far from definitive, showdown.

There's a reduced role for Ron (Rupert Grint), though the Weasleys have one spectacular fireworks display. Hagrid gets just two scenes, but we do make the acquaintance of his half-witted brother, not one of the series' subtlest CGI creations.

Lupin and Mad Eye Moody scarcely have a line between them. True to form, Alan Rickman's Snape makes the most of the few bones sent his way. Perhaps mindful of the criticism that's been lobbed at her from feminist literary critics, Hermione (Emma Watson) takes the initiative now and then, which is nice. Mind you, she's still pretty colourless compared to the film's two most arresting new characters: the friendly but decidedly spooky Luna Lovegood (Evanna Lynch), and the not-so-friendly but rampantly exotic Bellatrix Lestrange (Helena Bonham Carter in full cry). More Bellatrix please!

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

An experienced TV director with just one previous feature to his credit (the underrated Titchborne Claimant), David Yates has made a good fist of this difficult assignment, and given that he's been given the reins for book six too, the powers that be must be happy with his work. I think audiences will be too, especially as the last act is so strong. But at the same time it's becoming clear that this series is running out of magic; there's less of a Wow! factor here, less fun (Yates made the brave decision to spare us another game of Quidditch), and more a sense of grim determination. Like I said, it's a difficult age.

Tom Charity

View Details

More information about Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix »

Critics' Reviews

Rating of 3 
	  stars out of 5 Wally Hammond, Time Out

A midsummer release seems inappropriate for Harry 5, with its intriguing aura of new-term blues, as a hormonally... read more on www.timeout.com

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 5 starsDefinately Spell.....binding....

PaulaWestwood from Ashton-Under-Lyne [Highly rated reviewer] , 14/07/2007

Another outing for our worthy wand wavers, and another sure fire hit, if anything it just gets better as our Wizards start to come of age.

Certainly the fantastic effects play a part in this, but just as magnificent are the performances of the cast. Not to be outshone by our usual friends, and foes, Imelda Staunton is gloriously horrible as Dolores Umbridge, Maggie Smith as always as Minerva, Evanna Lynch superb as Luna 'Looney' Lovegood, I could go on and on and on...

I can't see anyone with any sense of a good film not liking this, it is just a brilliant brilliant piece of storybook cinema at its very very best, superb !!!. Highly recommended.

  34 out of 46 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsOrder of the Phoenix is a burning success.

A customer from London, England , 12/07/2007

Well At last! An enjoyable film that appeals to adults, adolescents as well as children. With more than just a nod to LOTR, it successfully combines a dark, grim, questing and fearful atmosphere that captures the attention and the empathy of the audience in a way other HP films may have failed to before. What I also liked about this film was its far less clumsy understanding of the changing nature of self (especially as one grows up at school). Emotional problems are less obviously signposted and less easily resolved. This was, in other words, more realistic, joined-up and intuitive.

Ultimately, the 2 new characters (the macabre professor and the, dizzy yet frankly strange student) were marvellous for their idiosyncracies and the additions their characters brought to the plot. Speaking of which, the usual HP plot was there. A conspiracy, a quest, a tragedy and a triumph with a smattering of barely suppressed romance and adult-child relations thrown in for good measure. HP fans will not be disappointed and doublely so because the younger ones will have gronw up with this genre now and be demanding more than just quidditch fun and games.

Go and take your OWLs..

  31 out of 35 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsBrilliant

A customer from Wales , 15/07/2007

I am a self confessed Potter addict. Been patiently waiting the last few months for the film to reach the cinema.

This film proves that sequels can get better!!!!!!!!

I took my 6 year old daughter who also loved the film, so its for adults and children. It has everything you could possibly want from a film, its serious in places, its romantic and funny. Of course there has been a few bits missed from the book, but i think they have done an amazingly good job all the same.

  13 out of 17 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsOH MY DAYS!

A customer from neverland , 13/07/2007

one of the best if not THE best film i have ever seen!, soo much better than all the rest GO SEE IT NOW

  13 out of 22 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 5 starsOH MY DAYS!

A customer from neverland , 13/07/2007

one of the best if not THE best film i have ever seen!, soo much better than all the rest GO SEE IT NOW

  13 out of 22 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 4 starsPotter!

Hannsipans from Biggleswade , 25/02/2008

Acting has definately improved with time and age! I love the Harry Potter books so im always disapponted that the film can't be longer to fit absolutely EVERYTHING in! This film is definately the best out of all of the Harry Potter films and no doubt i will say the same thing when the next film come out~! The reason I have given it four stars instead of five is because i always think that a book is so much better than the film adaptations, a book can tell you a lot more than what a film can. But if you rate the film on its own merit then it is definately worth five stars, its hard to switch the brain into this mode though when you have read the book. It is still worth a watch though even if you have read the book! The film has been put together amazingly well, the graphic are better with every film!

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews


* The Amazon.co.uk prices on our site are updated every 24 hours and may not be up to date at the time you view this page.
To see the current new and "new and used" Amazon.co.uk prices, please click on the Buy button.