Skip over navigation

Silk

Rated - 1.5 stars

It's possible to make a film about very little… the veteran French filmmaker Eric Rohmer has fashioned a wonderful career out of examining romantic ardors that are rarely consummated, and sometimes barely articulated. Still, it's a delicate art, and when it doesn't come off the results can be excruciating.

Sadly, Silk is a case in point. French Canadian director Francois Girard is a talented chap - his Thirty Two Short Films About Glenn Gould was a wonderfully spry, innovative alternative to a traditional biopic, and The Red Violin had some fans too.

But it's been nine years since then, and it's possible that when it came to Silk, Girard is guilty of over-thinking the material. Much of it looks exquisite, but the characters seem still-born, and the story, well, it's hardly there at all.

In what is probably the film's fatal flaw, baby-faced slacker Michael Pitt has been cast as a 19th Century French silk merchant, Hervé Joncour. This is the kind of miscasting that occurs when accountants at international sales agents call the shots. Pitt has a certain art-house cachet on the strength of Bertolucci's The Dreamers and Van Sant's Last Days, but it's obvious he's been cast on the assumption that it takes a North American actor to crack the North American market. That's surely a fallacy, and Pitt's pulling power in this role is probably close to zero. Ralph Fiennes might have been a better choice. Or better yet a Frenchman: perhaps Pitt's Dreamers' costar Louis Garrel.

In any case, Keira Knightley is Hervé's sensual young wife, Helene - and a thankless role it is too, consisting largely of fond farewells and ailing health. (In the print I saw at a North American festival, Knightley's role seemed to have been over-dubbed by an uncredited actress, but I have not been able to confirm if this is the case with the UK release version.)

A third improbable Frenchman, Alfred Molina, perks things up from time to time as Hervé's boss and sponsor, Baldabiou, who spends his leisure time attempting to master the art of one-armed pool. It's Baldabiou who sends the young man off to Japan - in the nineteenth century terra incognita to European traders - to bring back uncontaminated silkworm eggs.

The journey is long and perilous, but at least it affords stunning travelogue footage - easily the film's best asset. Guided, blindfolded, to a remote feudal village, Hervé signals his willingness to trade gold for eggs, and fortunately the local lord speaks English (or is it French? It's hard to tell) and resists the temptation to murder the boy and steal his money.

Taking tea with his new business associate, the young man is bewitched by a concubine (newcomer Sei Ashina). Although the two of them cannot converse, and Hervé believes himself to be in love with his wife, he becomes infatuated with the thought of the girl, and itches to return to the Orient to see her again. (A romantic obsession Pitt translates into his usual mope.)

Alessandro Baricco's acclaimed novella runs to just 112 pages, so you will trust me when I say the film's 112 minutes are not exactly action-packed. Some excitement seems to be in the offing when Hervé foolishly insists on returning to Japan in the midst of civil war, but don't get your hopes up for anything resembling action. When Hervé visits a brothel, it's to ask the madam to translate a letter.

Luis Bunuel would have appreciated that little scene. He would have found the surreal comedy in this exotic erotica. Girard doesn't have that kind of steel; he just keeps piling on the romantic agony and whipping up Ryuchi Sakamoto's overblown score in the hopes of extracting a tear or two. Maudlin, miscast and unforgivably self-indulgent, Silk is wallpaper for art-house cinemas too timid to show real art.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about Silk »

Critics' Reviews

Rating of 2 
	  stars out of 5 Maitland McDonagh, Time Out

If Marco Polo had been a Valley girl, his diaries might have read like Michael Pitts somnolent voiceover, which... read more on www.timeout.com

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 4 starsAn elegant and subtly moving movie!

eltongo from London , 13/02/2008

I watched this film at the cinema, and was pleasantly surprised, especially having read the mostly negative reviews. The film was beautifully shot and it flows at a gentle and steady pace, which is enjoyable. While I’m not a fan of Michael Pitt, I disagree with the common remarks regarding his 'wooden' acting. He doesn't always show his emotion visibly, but it was clearly felt, just like in real life. Music by Ryuichi Sakamoto enhances the mood and pace of the film terribly well.

If you prefer one of those so-called “entertaining” films such as Pirates of the Caribbean or Charlie's Angels, this is probably not for you, but Silk is certainly an enjoyable movie for the more sophisticated crowd to watch. I recommend it.

  27 out of 27 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starsillk - rather, slick nylon

A customer from Henley-on-Thames , 13/12/2007

while the film is beautiful, it is lengthy, and un-involving - dull, dull, dull.

  11 out of 13 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsA movie about feelings !!!

crockery from Belfast [Highly rated reviewer] , 06/04/2008

Silk is a movie about feelings. Feelings from the hearth of course, but also feelings of the senses. The film wants the immerse his viewers into the feelings of the adventurous merchant Hervé Joncour. To accomplish that, Girard chose to make very long and slow scenes all about details and little things. Small drips of water in the bath, long pouring of tea in a very small cup... By spending so much time on creating this universe of sensuality, the movie omit to explains a lot of the 'Whys' and 'hows' of the storyline. Also, since we really follow the story trough Joncour eyes, all the things that he don't knows or don't understand, we don't either.

On the positive side, the film is beautiful. Really, really gorgeous. From the little village in France to the even smaller village in Japan, Joncour travels are sumptuous. The mountains, the hot source of water, the passing boat, the Japanese (sic) girl, the garden .... everything is a feast for the eyes. So in a way, we don't have any problems getting Hervé exterior feelings.

The problems comes from getting Hervé interior feelings. He says at one point that he is torn apart.. well i didn't feel it. Not that the actor are not good.. its just that they don't let us go inside them.. care for them.

3,5 will be fair !!!

  8 out of 8 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starSilk

Keeley Andrews from Wickford, Essex [Highly rated reviewer] , 13/10/2008

Why is it that any film with Keira Knightley in it depresses me beyond belief! This film was a waste of time, the scenery and music were the only redeeming qualities about it. I could not see the point of why the lead male would throw everything away on a concubine that he didn't even speak to and why he got so obssessed by her. I would defintely not recommend this film, it was slow and very boring.

  6 out of 6 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 1 starSilk

Keeley Andrews from Wickford, Essex [Highly rated reviewer] , 13/10/2008

Why is it that any film with Keira Knightley in it depresses me beyond belief! This film was a waste of time, the scenery and music were the only redeeming qualities about it. I could not see the point of why the lead male would throw everything away on a concubine that he didn't even speak to and why he got so obssessed by her. I would defintely not recommend this film, it was slow and very boring.

  6 out of 6 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 3 starsA movie about feelings !!!

crockery from Belfast [Highly rated reviewer] , 06/04/2008

Silk is a movie about feelings. Feelings from the hearth of course, but also feelings of the senses. The film wants the immerse his viewers into the feelings of the adventurous merchant Hervé Joncour. To accomplish that, Girard chose to make very long and slow scenes all about details and little things. Small drips of water in the bath, long pouring of tea in a very small cup... By spending so much time on creating this universe of sensuality, the movie omit to explains a lot of the 'Whys' and 'hows' of the storyline. Also, since we really follow the story trough Joncour eyes, all the things that he don't knows or don't understand, we don't either.

On the positive side, the film is beautiful. Really, really gorgeous. From the little village in France to the even smaller village in Japan, Joncour travels are sumptuous. The mountains, the hot source of water, the passing boat, the Japanese (sic) girl, the garden .... everything is a feast for the eyes. So in a way, we don't have any problems getting Hervé exterior feelings.

The problems comes from getting Hervé interior feelings. He says at one point that he is torn apart.. well i didn't feel it. Not that the actor are not good.. its just that they don't let us go inside them.. care for them.

3,5 will be fair !!!

  8 out of 8 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews