Skip over navigation

American Gangster

Rated - 4 stars

Frank Lucas (Denzel Washington) is welcoming his brothers, cousins and nephews to their new life in Harlem with a celebratory lunch. He's brought them here from rural Carolina to guarantee a loyal crew now that he's all set up to become the number one drug dealer north of 110th Street. Then he spots one dude, a loudmouth dealer by the name of Tango, who might have a problem with that walking down the street.

Cool as ice cream, Frank empties out the sugar bowl and walks out of the café. Then he offers the Tango the empty bowl - for tips. It's a calculatedly grievous insult. "What are you going to do? Shoot me here in the street?" demands his outraged rival. And that's exactly what Lucas does: right in the centre of his forehead. Then he goes back to his lunch. "Where was I?" he asks, nonchalantly. He's made his point and you can be sure Harlem has got the message.

This gesture isn't entirely typical. Lucas is capable of doing whatever is necessary - the very first shot in the film finds him setting fire to some foot soldier who's crossed the line - but with rare exceptions his violence is controlled. He's ruthless, yes, but only as a means to an end. He wants to be rich, like his old mentor, Bumpy (Clarence Williams III). And richer still: he wants to be "white man wealthy".

And so it is that this country boy turned driver to a drug kingpin bides his time when that kingpin dies. He's nowhere on the ladder; a lackey whose meal ticket just passed away. But he's been watching and learning, and when he sees a business opportunity - soldiers returning from Vietnam still high on the local heroin - he grabs it with both hands, taking a trip out to Indochina to do the deal, and paying out enough backhanders to cut the US military into the operation.

Set at the height of the Vietnam War, 1968-1975, Ridley Scott's star-driven double-header harbors a certain admiration for this smart black market entrepreneur. By eliminating the middleman he's able to undercut the competition by two hundred percent, and with a superior product. In any other field he'd be the toast of Wall Street. In the drug business, it's safer to stay under the radar.

While Frank Lucas is living the American Dream - he marries a Puerto Rican beauty queen (Lymari Nadal) and buys a Long Island mansion - Detective Richie Roberts (Russell Crowe) is grappling with an evening class in law. His wife wants nothing more to do with him and is taking the kid with her. He's a pariah on the force after discovering, then handing in a million dollars in unmarked bills. Who could trust a guy like that?

Invited to set up a special narcotics unit with men of his own choosing, Roberts has to engage in some social anthropology of his own to figure out the invisible power structure behind the booming heroin epidemic… The big break in the case comes when Lucas lowers his guard at Ali vs Frazier. His seats are better than the mafia's.

A heavyweight by design, American Gangster clocks in at two and a half hours and packs a solid wallop. Whether it can live up to sky-high expectations I'm not sure. Even Ridley Scott has found himself name-checking The Godfather and The French Connection; both pertinent comparisons up to a point, but suggestive of fireworks that don't quite ignite here.

I was reminded more of zealous New York thrillers by Sidney Lumet - films like Prince Of The City and Serpico - not just because Richie Roberts might have been the model for those straight arrow, squeaky wheel cops, but because Steve Zaillian's screenplay doggedly puts the focus on process and ethics not action and adrenaline. (Josh Brolin, as a venally corrupt NYPD detective, and Armand Assante as a mafia don could easily be interlopers from Lumet's moral universe: they're larger than life but aggressively true to it.) The crucial difference would be that these films reflected on pressingly recent events. Scott's is an exercise in movie mythology, not political commentary.

It's also true that TV series like The Sopranos and The Wire have raised the bar by exploring this kind of material in depth a mere movie can only hint at. Zaillian's adept script is packed with interesting detail, but scene-for-scene, there's a creeping sense of déja-vu in the police procedural aspects.

Still, a movie has its own dynamic - and in this case, two powerhouse character portraits from Washington and Crowe. There's something irresistible about the way Zaillian's parallel narratives gradually converge, the black and white mirror images of the dedicated cop and the consummate operator drawing ever nearer.

Packing a few extra pounds, Crowe brings his own considerable scowling integrity to Roberts, every inch a street level guy except for his determination to stay pure. But in a gangster movie it's the bad guy you come to see - and here Denzel kills. Whether it's fastidiously demonstrating the correct way to remove bloodstains from an alpaca rug ("Don't rub. Blot.") or patiently explaining the concept of trademark infringement to a rival dealer (Cuba Gooding Jnr as flamboyant Nicky Barnes), every move he makes speaks to Frank's pride and passion, the contained fury of an invisible man striving to get out from under. It's the American way, and he never spares a thought for the consequences.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about American Gangster »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 5 starsRidley back on form

citizenk from London [Highly rated reviewer] , 31/10/2007

After one of the most explosive opening scenes you're ever likely to see for a long time,this slow burner gets into stride and takes you with it. This story of the rise and fall of black 70's Harlem druglord Frank Lucas is loosely based on fact.Denzil Washington stars as Lucas and gives his best performance since his potrayal of a low-life 'tec in Training Day for which he won an Oscar. Lucas is a conservatively dressed small businessman on the surface,but lurking beneath this facade is a ruthless heroin wholesaler who undercuts all competition with deadly

uncut smack straight from the poppy fields in war ravaged Vietnam, He has local politicians,the army, and cops in his pocket,and with their help sets about wiping out his rivals.

The subplot concerns honest cop Russell Crowe who is given the task of putting a squad together in order to clean up the Ciy's drug problem.

The film looks brilliant. Scott and his team have pulled out all the stops in portraying seventies New York in all it's corrupt, faded glory.The cast

are all excellant and the script never lets them down for a single second. Though violent at times,the film is never gratuitous as it blurs the line

between corrupted and corruptor. All in all a tour de force from Scott,

and the best gangster film for an age. Don't miss it.

  213 out of 217 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

* * * This review contains spoilers * * *

Rated - 0 starsA day of fishing is packed with more excitement

KatiMark KatiMark from Warwickshire, England [Highly rated reviewer] , 05/01/2008

Did my fellow reviewers watch the same thing? I left half way through with my friends as it was pure rubbish. You could relate this entire film to the feeling many of us could relate to at the end of the lord of the rings films, frustration and a thought that it will never end.

Every scene in this film lasts 100% longer than it needs to. The acting is dull and uninspiring. The film orientates itself around killing and drugs. Yet another to add to the list of so many other unoriginal plots.

Transparent and see-through. Avoid.

  92 out of 97 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starLong

bella411 bella411 [Highly rated reviewer] , 19/12/2007

I found this film a struggle to continue watching until the end and i thought the last 30 minutes was the best part of the film.

  75 out of 79 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starA Waste Of 2 1/2 Hours

futbar from Barnsley [Highly rated reviewer] , 10/02/2008

The reviewers said this was the best film of the year so i thought 'wehey this must be brill, great actors, big budget the lot' How disappointed i was then that an hour into the film we were so board that we did the unthinkable and walked out of the cinema, we couldn't care less about the characters, the only thing i was left wondering about the film is where i could send my tickets for a refund, and whether i could sue the cinema as this film is surely covered by the sale of goods act, and was definatly NOT fit for purpose!

  72 out of 79 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 1 starLong

bella411 bella411 [Highly rated reviewer] , 19/12/2007

I found this film a struggle to continue watching until the end and i thought the last 30 minutes was the best part of the film.

  75 out of 79 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 2 starsOVVERRATED

A customer from EDINBURGH , 25/03/2008

The leads deliver solid performances but something about this film just didnt work - im not sure if it was the tedious pacing , the unimaginative soundtrack or the constant unintentional reminders from the director that serpico,french connection and scarface are all vastly superior films - not a good idea .

I found my attention wandering a fair bit , the main characters just werent interesting or charasmatic enough to hold an audience for 2 and a half hours and the director seemed unsure about how to portray any conflict and contradictions in the characters.

Josh brolin does a nice supporting turn as a corrupt cop and there are some nicely shot scenes for sure but id be surprised if many cinema fans over 30 werent dissapointed by this drug crime saga by numbers .

Its all been done so much better before.

  7 out of 8 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews


* The Amazon.co.uk prices on our site are updated every 24 hours and may not be up to date at the time you view this page.
To see the current new and "new and used" Amazon.co.uk prices, please click on the Buy button.