Skip over navigation

There Will Be Blood

Rated - 5 stars

In the beginning there is darkness. And in the darkness, a man with a pickaxe claws at the earth as if he's looking for the way back in. He grunts from such heavy labour but he keeps right on digging.

Paul Thomas Anderson's fifth film - his first unalloyed masterpiece, and nothing less than a twentieth century foundation myth - shapes up like this, in stark, primitive strokes and sounds. It will be 15 minutes or more before we hear a line of dialogue. Jonny Greenwood's orchestral score cuts in with the picture: an immediately anxious, unsettling, discordant crescendo. Agitato. Taken with the gothic type of Anderson's sanguinary title, it suggests horrors are on the horizon. (Or beneath it.)

The year is 1898, and our miner (Daniel Day-Lewis) is about to make his first strike. The silver ore he discovers - even as he breaks his leg in a fall - doesn't make him wealthy overnight, but it will lay the foundation for his subsequent fortunes. We watch him scratch his name on the claim stake after he's dragged himself back to town: Daniel Plainview.

This will prove a recurring pattern, though Plainview never acknowledges it: those moments of triumph and vindication - the strikes and the gushers and the deals - will bring disaster hand in hand: death, betrayal and isolation. The more successful he becomes, the lower he will sink.

By 1902, Plainview has come up with an improved digging operation - a prototype derrick - and he's on the verge of a more important discovery: oil. He has a team of men under him now. There's even a baby in the camp. The infant's father anoints him with a dab of the black stuff, a mock religious gesture that might invite a blessing or a curse. Minutes later an accident orphans the child and the boss is left bouncing the baby on his knee.

The boy - H.W - is seven years old when the first words flow. They take the form of a lengthy introduction as Plainview presents his credentials to a town licensing drilling rights - outside, oil is literally running down the street.

It is a speech we will hear several times over the next two hours; each time honed a little more cleverly (perhaps "refined" is a better word). It is a speech that says, 'You can trust me, I am oilman, I know what I am doing and I am not here to swindle you. I am a family man like you. We value children and community and prayers, and we will prosper together.'

Already Plainview presents himself as an upright and prosperous fellow. He is well dressed in the Western manner, and there's nothing of the roughneck about him. He's assiduously well-spoken, formal and polite. His voice is deep, honeyed and mellifluous (did Daniel Day-Lewis mean to echo John Huston? Regardless it's a staggering performance on a physical and psychological level, a brilliant depiction of aging and mental - and spiritual - disintegration). Part of the drama's pull is gauging Plainview's sincerity in these dealings, and recognizing the extent to which his entire pitch is horsewash.

Well, he is an oilman; that much is true. But it's soon apparent (even if we couldn't guess) he'll swindle as best he may, and he couldn't give two hoots for the rest.

Later, when he sets up in Little Boston, his office will stand at one end of town. Eli Sunday's (Paul Dano) Church of the Third Revelation will stand across the way at the other. (The first revelation was Moses. The second was Jesus Christ. The third may or may not be pending) They're the first two permanent constructions this side of the station, the twin pillars of a burgeoning tent city. Plainview talks piously to appease the natives, but he's astonished when he ventures in one time and sees Eli's evangelical preaching (a bravura one-take turn by Dano, the elective mute from Little Miss Sunshine). It takes a fake to know a fake. "Goddam hell of a show," he mutters.

That goes double for Anderson's amazing movie: it is a goddam hell of a show. A bit of showboat in Magnolia and Boogie Nights (much as I love them), PTA reveals a new discipline and maturity here. It's a conscious throwback to classical cinema - at various times it evokes silent movies, von Stroheim's Greed, for instance; Kubrickian black comedy; the western and the monster movie. Anderson has talked about Plainview as a vampire figure - blood and oil running together like shit and money in a Freudian dream reading. He's alone in this world, but a blood brother to those terrifying capitalist kingpins in Citizen Kane, and Chinatown, and even Deadwood.

Greed consumes Daniel; it festers in his male emptiness and pride. He is a self-made man, or tries to be, and the movie comprehends the crushing futility of that beast; the anger and self-loathing.

"Are you are an angry man? Are you envious?" Plainview demands of one, short-lived intimate. "I have a competition in me," he confesses. "I want no one else to succeed. I hate most people." And then he smiles.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about There Will Be Blood »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 5 starsDaniel Day Lewis extravaganza

Katherine from London [Highly rated reviewer] , 04/02/2008

I have been a big fan of Daniel Day-Lewis for a very long time. In terms of acting ability he must be classed as amongst the top echelon of those people without peer. This performance is totally enthralling and the only downside is that as with a film such as Gangs of New York, the rest of the cast simply cannot match the sheer intensity of who they are performing with. This film is excellent to watch, exciting and interesting all the way through and I would recommend it to anyone.

  215 out of 220 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 0 starsThere Will Be Blood

Howdydoodat from Hitchin , 12/02/2008

I also saw this last night and long winded is right. I think there is starting to be an element of the emperor's new clothes around DDL with every film he is in automaically feted as a masterpiece when in actuality it is only his performance that stands any scrutiny at all. This film could easily have an hour cut from it and still tell the story. In retrospect long winded is not correct boring is the word just ask my brother, he fell asleep.

  154 out of 164 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starIt's no masterpeice

PeterWood from Bath , 18/02/2008

Ok i was really really looking forward to seeing this having read the reviews and all, but to say it was a disapointment would be an understatement to say the least. The basic story was good, the acting was pretty good (especially daniel day lewis), however the dialogue and the directing were awful. The characters all seem awkward and while there are a few bits of engaging and intersting dialogue they are few and far between.

Now when i say the directing was awful i mean that the pace of the film was all wrong its like the film keeps stalling. Just as it gets exciting we drop into a 20 minuite long boring and awkward dialogue that is irrelevent to the film. It's almost like they are trying to hide the intresting bits of the film so you have to work as hard as daniel plainview to find the gold/oil.

In other words if you need a cure for insomnia look no further, if you want an engaging intresting film i would keep looking.

  117 out of 125 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsVery good but not a classic

danielpetry from Stratford , 17/02/2008

This is certainly an excellent, intelligent piece of filmmaking, unnerving and dark in places with skilful contrast of moods. However comparisons to e.g. Citizen Kane and The Godfather do not in my opinion hold, as it is not as dense and complex as these two, especially Citizen Kane. Day-Lewis' performance is very good, imagery and symbolism is powerful but the message is not developed as deeply as needed to put this in a list of 'great' movies. Definitely see this, but do not expect it to live up to the stratospheric hype that some critics have given it.

  63 out of 66 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 1 starThere Will Be Boredom

crossy from Atherstone [Highly rated reviewer] , 08/07/2008

Thought there was plenty of good acting apparent but there was little in the way of a plot with probably only about 4 or 5 scenes where there was sufficient interest to keep you awake. It took two attempts to see this film all the way through (I literally fell asleep on my first attempt).

I chose this film due to the star rating which has served me well historically, on this occasion I just believe it was over rated.

  10 out of 10 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 5 starstruly breathtaking

pelvey from Retford [Highly rated reviewer] , 21/07/2008

it isn't often that i keep a film for two weeks.

i just had to watch this again. then again.

watching this film is like having everything you know about cinema deconstructed and built up again in a different order.

Paul thomas anderson has created a true modern cinematic masterpiece.

jonny greenwoods score, robert elswits cinematography, daniel day lewis' performance all held together with considerable skill by PTA manage to offer one of the greatest expositions of megalomania ever committed to screen.

there were periods in the film when i had to remind myself to breathe, such was the combined power of all of the above.

rent this movie

but do not only watch it once.

  10 out of 10 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews