Skip over navigation

Diary of the Dead

Rated - 4 stars

Zombie maestro George A Romero proves us all wrong again: you really can flog a dead horse. Just watch that it doesn't bite you back.

This isn't exactly a sequel to the unfolding Night Of The Living Dead series (so far 68-year-old Romero has given us Dawn Of The Dead, Day Of The Dead and Land of the Dead, and not a dud among them). Rather, it takes us back to square one and the very first night.

The diary idea is similar to the first-person point of view in Cloverfield and The Blair Witch Project. The film presents itself as "The Death of Death", a documentary put together by a film student from his own footage and various downloads from the internet.

Jason Creed (Joshua Close) is shooting a horror movie (a mummy film in fact) out in the woods with several classmates and his teacher, Professor Maxwell (Scott Wentworth), when they hear the first confused radio reports of mass panic spreading across the country. The broadcast is garbled but no less alarming for that. Jason's lead actor, Ridley (Philip Riccio), takes off for home in his sports car. The remainder of the tiny cast and crew - Jason's girlfriend Debra (Michelle Morgan), "actress" Tracy (Amy Lalonde), camera and sound guys Eliot (Joe Dinicol) and Tony (Shawn Roberts) - pile into a Winnebago and drive into the night.

Their college dorm is deserted. It doesn't look good. In fact the further they go, the worse things get. The dead are rising up to attack the living. Jason videotapes his friends' mounting fear and confusion as they try to contact loved ones, worry about depleting stocks of gasoline, food and ammo, (and alcohol, in the British Professor's case) and adjust to the new imperative for violent self-defence.

Romero's zombies may not be light on their feet, but they're relentless and the odds are very much in their favour.

A stopover at a farm brings this new reality into the sharpest focus when a deaf-mute Amish bucks a few stereotypes with his resourceful application of a scythe. Grim Reaper eat your heart out!

Made cheaply in Toronto with a cast of newcomers, Diary Of The Dead is a more coherent movie than Cloverfield, and just as well acted, but it's weighed down with too much heavy-handed dialogue about media ethics and the responsibilities of the guy cowering behind his camera. Granted, these students may have been studying Susan Sontag, but their Professor's recourse to the bottle seems an altogether more reasonable response to their shared predicament.

Romero is a satirist as much as he's a scare-monger, but he's not one to soft-pedal the gore, which can be gruesome and funny at the same time. He finds particularly inventive use of an empty hospital as a killing resource, but remains doggedly wedded to the notion that what passes for humanity these days is more frightening than any CGI creation.

Tense and suspenseful, Diary proves there's still life in the zombies, 40 years after Mr Romero first let them loose on the North American psyche.

Incidentally, according to the imdb, if the newscasters sound familiar, it's because they're voiced by Simon Pegg, Quentin Tarantino, Wes Craven, Stephen King and Guillermo Del Toro. You can imagine; the news ain't good.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about Diary of the Dead »

Critics' Reviews

Rating of 4 
	  stars out of 5 David Fear, Time Out

Rebooting his Dead series right back to moment zero, George Romero delivers the first chapter of a new era: When... read more on www.timeout.com

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 0 starsSO SO SO SO BAD!!!!!

emzash from Newcastle upon Tyne [Highly rated reviewer] , 10/03/2008

PLEASE DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME AND MONEY ON THIS GARBAGE! ! !

WORST FILM I HAVE EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE........

ITS CRAZY HOW FILMS THIS BAD CAN BE MADE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  83 out of 85 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsthe worst dead

Russell22 [Highly rated reviewer] , 09/03/2008

Diary of the dead is george romero's 5th zombie film and the 2nd one he's done in the last 3 yrs. This installment takes us back to the day it all started and is told from the perspective of a group of college students who are filming as the zombie outbreak occurs..think cloverfield with zombies and you'd be on the right track.

Things start promisingly enough with some tension and good make up fx..but about 30 mins in the whole things goes seadily downhill. The film is told at a sanils pace..long lingering dialogue scenes occur without anything really happeneing. When the zombies are on screen the whole thing livens up but the rest is so boring. There was long exposition in both dawn and day of the dead but in those films we cared about the characters and their relationships with one a nother. In this you dont give a damn who dies next and everyone is just bland..apart from the only good character,the kids cocky,alcaholic college professor who prefers to kill zombies with a bow and arrow coz its more dignified!

Some other reviewer said this was better than Land of the dead....it isnt....land was far superior to this even though that was the worse installement till this one. Land had some great moments and great zombie kills/fx and even a couple of cool characters but this has litle to offer.

It isnt all bad..romero is incapable of making a completley bad film. The first 30 mins or so is quite well handled and some of the zombie kills are fun and the last scene is very romero and really cool.

If you are new to these films..below is how i'd rate these in order

1. Dawn of the dead (1979) ( the best installement..the citizen kane of zombie films!)

2. Day of the dead (1985) ( the most goriest and over the top and a cool bad guy too)

3 Night of the living dead (1968) ( grounbreaking when released but quite basic now,save for the very powerful end scene)

4. Land of the dead (2005) ( the most high budget and has the most recognisable cast..a decent entry but nowhere near the best)

5. Diary of the dead (2008) ( well the worse enrty to date im afraid,see review above)

  29 out of 30 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsThis old Zombie still has some life in it

Vivacia from London [Highly rated reviewer] , 17/03/2008

Zombies? Check. College Kids? Check. Romero? Check. Running headlong into danger with no apparant regard for your own safety? Double Check.

If the above sounds familiar than you know what to expect from Romero's 'Diary Of The Dead'. Not a lot of new ground is covered though it is told in a different way, with every shot being made by the protaganists themselves as they document the sudden rise of the dead and the chaos it causes. Through their filming and internet posts we see the 'dawn of the dead' in the era of camera phones and downloads. Romera has a point to make in this film and it isn't subtle. He at once shows the strengths and weaknesses of the internet/youtube age, as the official media lie about the recent phenomena and the internet confuses everyone with the mass of information available.

If you're not into 'messages' in films than 'Diary Of The Dead' will likely annoy you, as it is very heavy handed. But if you take this film as it seems to have been intended (tongue firmly in cheek) then it is an enjoyable ride with a number of dark humour jokes along the way. The graphics are excellent and the zombie death scenes more imaginative then they've been in other Romero works. Not to mention the coolest Amish man in movies ever.

Sadly though'Diary Of The Dead' is not without it's problems. The cast of characters we are following are largely bland, uncharismatic and at times make crazy decisions that no sane person would surely make in this situation. It's largely acceptable that they manage to get their hands on so many weapons so quickly (this is America after all) but it makes you long for the inventiveness of Shaun with nothing but garden implements and a cricket bat to fight the undead. The biggest problem by far though can be summed up in one word - 'Cloverfield'. This film will unfairly be compared to that other 'first person perspective' horror movie and it does suffer when held up against it. The shock value is gone and there's a distinct feeling of 'i've seen this before'. Romero likely kicked himself for not getting this film out first.

'Diary Of The Dead' is a fun, relatively short ride that is a welcome, though by far not the best, addition to the Romero/Zombie catalogue. If you've never 'got' Romero's humour in his other films give this one a miss, as this is the major saving grace of the film. Here's hoping Romero will give up the Zombies for a bit and try his hand at something else. Mummies anyone?

  16 out of 18 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsDisappointing

Mark from Wimbledon, London [Highly rated reviewer] , 13/03/2008

I'm a massive zombie/Romero fan, but I'm beginning to think that perhaps he isn't quite as great as I originally thought, and that he just got lucky with his first 2 films. I think this had potential to be good, and I think that it's so easy to make a decent zombie film, yet he screwed it up. The main bugbear is people simply not behaving in a realistic fashion in this situation.

e.g. 'Zombies are attacking everyone and we know that you have to get them in the head to kill them. Ooh, a lovely cache of weapons - what do we have here? Machinegun, ok...pistol...good...Oh I know, I'll take this bow and arrow. And maybe I'll get drunk while I'm at it'

Nuff said.

The myspace-esque social commentary stuff is also a bit last year and comes across quite overdone and contrived.

  15 out of 16 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 2 starsNothing good here

FalloutBBT , 22/07/2008

Like many of the reviewers here, I am a huge zombie fan, and have (had?) massive respect for Romero. But this film is a very poor effort. It feels like 1 days worth of brainstorming to come up with a premise, followed by 1 more day of script writing. I watched the whole movie detached and uninterested and worst of all, it was completely devoid of that feeling of apocalypse and isolation all other good zombie movies provide.

Simple fact is, I own all the Romero movies on DVD, all the Resident Evil movies, the Dawn of the Dead remake, 28 days later and 28 weeks later, and a few others ... I'll buy any zombie movie that has at least a few redeeming features to make it special. But, this was so poor and boring that I'm not remotely interested in owning it.

Can't say more than that.

Sorry George, but pull your finger out!

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 2 starsdiary of the dull

mohomonkeyman mohomonkeyman from Birmingham [Highly rated reviewer] , 04/07/2008

definnitely not the best Romero film i've ever seen, found the characters extremely annoying and frustrating, zombies looked pretty cool and the violence was as gratuitous as you would expect from this sort of movie - but it is definitely lacking in the excitement factor - was tempted to switch off about 2/3 of the way through... prepare to be disappointed.

  3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews