Skip over navigation

10,000 BC

Rated - 2 stars

Sometimes legends last longer than Truth. I paraphrase, but that's more or less the first thing we hear from the narrator - Omar Sharif, no less - as we settle down with our popcorn. It's a tip that Roland Emmerich doesn't aspire to pre-historical accuracy, or perhaps a get-out clause to answer those pedants who complain that putting dinosaurs in the same time period as a certain landmark construction site on the Nile is quite a stretch. One of many in fact.

Herr Emmerich is not in the reality business. His last four pictures were Independence Day, Godzilla, The Patriot and The Day After Tomorrow. All of them made over $100 million at the US box office, and in most cases, much more. He makes big, bold blockbusters; dumb fun, if we're lucky.

10,000 BC just about qualifies, but the dumb outweighs the fun - so much so, you could say the dumb is the fun.

D'Leh (Steven Strait) is an orphan child of a curious mountainous tribe, hunters with a taste for mammoth meat.

But their way of life is imperiled by the encroaching ice age, so says the village soothsayer (Emmerich evidently hasn't got climate change out of his system). Her prophecy speaks of a warrior who will vanquish the four-legged demons (men on horseback), rescue the lovely Evolet (Camilla Belle) from her kidnappers, and reveal to the tribe a new sustainable way of life�

Could D'Leh be that hero? He has his doubts, but with his crusty dreadlocks, perfect teeth and surfer dude body he certainly seems like the only viable candidate. He also fancies Evolet something rotten, so that's a start. "See that light in the sky, the one that doesn't move," he tells her, pointing to the morning star. "That is how I feel for you in my heart." (Again, I'm paraphrasing, but you get the picture: he's no caveman in the romance department.)

The rowdy preview audience I saw this with wasn't really up for this soppy love story or D'Leh's identity crisis. It's only when Emmerich produced a herd of stampeding mammoths that he got the crowd onside. Even then, though the CGI creatures are impressive, the action sequence was so choppily edited it was hard to follow just what was going on.

The story is Apocalypto redux: D'Leh is doing the chasing, but the villainous Arab-looking bandits are slave traders feeding a building programme even more ambitious than the Mayans'.

The geography is about as convincing as the history. The journey takes from snowy mountains to equatorial rain forest to the Sahara desert and the Nile, but it wouldn't matter if these environments didn't have such a Disneyland atmosphere. Perhaps they strayed into Jurassic Park on their travels?

A run-in with a large, surprisingly loyal saber-tooth tiger (or "Spear Tooth", as the local African agriculturalists have it) confirms how shamelessly Emmerich means to plunder myth, bible lore and the annals of Hollywood hokum to cobble together his own prefabricated legend. You'll find a bit of the Old Testament here, Peter Jackson there, some 300, a spot of Gladiator, and Joseph Campbell all over the place.

The trouble with this pick-n-mix approach to reality is that it sacrifices authenticity for spectacle. On this showing it's a poor trade: the characters ring false; there's no suspense; no conviction, just mounting disbelief as the show gets sillier and sillier.

This isn't an actors' film, obviously, but even on the action front it's mostly tepid. It does muster a bit of computer-generated scale, we'll give it that. And it's every bit as cheesy as could be. But as far as legends go, I can't see it enduring 10 minutes, let alone 10,000 years. There's nothing here to beat the memory of Raquel Welch and her furry bikini, and that's the honest truth.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about 10,000 BC »

Critics' Reviews

Empire

Undeniably spectacular... Entertainingly mad, rip-snorting throwback to vintage Saturday matinee fare, with all the swell set piece thrills state-of-the-art technology can throw at it

Hollywood Reporter

10,000 BC works just fine as an action Western with handsome actors in striking costumes and a few CG predators, which are giddy fun

Sight and Sound

An early mammoth-hunting sequence... is genuinely impressive, with CGI attending to each wind-ruffled, pachydermic hair

See all 5 Critics' Reviews »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 0 stars10,000 BS

hunkydomste hunkydomste from Liverpool [Highly rated reviewer] , 27/07/2008

I shall keep it brief, as I have already wasted 2 precious hours of my life on this film at the cinema. But it might not be too late for you, so: AVOID THIS TERRIBLE, AWFUL MOVIE!

From Mr Entertaining Big BadaBoom Blockbuster, Roland Emmerich (Independence Day, Day After Tomorrow) you would at least expect some, even if low brow, fun and enjoyment. Nope, none, not a sausage.

What's wrong with it? It will be quicker to tell you what I did enjoy about it, namely the very tasty ice cream I purchased of the Ben & Jerry's store in the foyer and having my hubby next to me pulling the same faces of disbelief and cringe- it made me feel better.

If at the point where someone asks 'Why is old mother cold?' you don't actually feel like shouting 'I don't care!', then congratulations, you did better than me. And maybe you can come up with a better answer to why she is cold than 'Because she's a clever wise woman who has teleported herself out of this pile of rubbish into somewhere much much better...'.

Dreadful and one of my 5 worst films ever.

  102 out of 103 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsStyle wins over substance yet again

Vivacia from London [Highly rated reviewer] , 25/03/2008

10,000 B.C. was one of the most anticipated movies of 2008. Sadly this 'epic' proves itself to be more of a damp squib than a blast, and seems to have left the golden rules of story telling in the cave it crawled out from. And be warned, this is no historical movie, but instead a purely fantasy based tale that never fully realises the obvious ambition behind it.

D'leh is a young mammoth hunter and would be leader of the tribe when the woman he loves, along with most of the tribe, are kidnapped by men on horseback, the 'four legged demons'. Pursuing these invaders he and two others track their people, overcoming sabre tooths and other tribes along the way. There's also a lot of stuff about prophecies and chosen ones but don't let that fool you, this is a 'journey' film, pure and simple.

At the risk of giving away certain plot points (if you REALLY don't want to know look away now and go straight to the below paragraph) 10,000 B.C. is in fact two different films slammed together to make a whole. The first half is a pre-historic version of 'Fellowship of the Ring', with a small band trekking across beautiful landscapes in search of their 'precious'. The second half is Stargate, which coincidentally was directed by a certain Roland Emmerich. If you've seen Emmerich's other fantasy work you will have a strangely strong sense of deja vu when we discover where the prisoners have been taken. Emmerich clearly enjoyed it so much he decided to make it again, this time with cavemen.

10,000 B.C. is not without it's positive aspects. The graphics are excellent and the mammoths are some of the most believable you'll see in cinema (except for Manny in 'Ice Age' of course) and it certainly isn't the dullest film you'll ever see. As long as it's taken for the mediocre fantasy film it is there's a lot to enjoy, especially with the final battle at the end (though be warned that this film has one of the most ludicrous endings to grace the silver screen). Other than this though there isn't a lot going for this pre-historic mish mash. Admittedly Emmerich isn't exactly known for 'substance' in his movies but with 10,000 B.C. he excels himself - vapid story telling has rarely been done so well. So turn your brains off and get out the popcorn - you're going to need it.

  37 out of 37 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsLooks great, but lacks something

Meako Meako from Sheffield [Highly rated reviewer] , 13/03/2008

Emmerich can certainly do spectacle well enough as this visually superb film attests. The practically seamless CGI (especially on the mammoth scenes) cannot fail to impress even the most scrutinizing of viewer. It is just such a shame that, as usual, story seems to be somewhat lacking, and the cast just fail to connect with the loose plot. The end result is a pleasing bit of popcorn fun, but one that will have you wanting some meat. The trailers hyped it as an action spectacle, but sadly it isn't. It is obvious why this has been released so early in the year, before the real blockbuster season starts, as it would not stand a chance against the rest of the product for the summer season.

  28 out of 28 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsDisappointing

A customer from London , 16/03/2008

Except for mammoths there was nothing really worth watching. If you have seen Apocalypto and 300.. then don't bother.

  18 out of 18 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 1 starPretty awful

mephistopheles from Cheshire [Highly rated reviewer] , 25/07/2008

1 star for the opening Mammoth hunt which is not bad but apart from that this movie is for the most part dull with characters of little substance,unlikeable and the same old tired storyline that was used in Apocalypto(a great movie by the way) and a million other films before..

I find it hilarious to read one suggestion here as regards watching it with english subtitles turned on so as to understand what's being said better.

What!

I wasn't aware of any such audio problem but I really don't see how this would add to the film.

Why concentrate on swill if nothing of importance is being said and it most certainly isn't.

Plus there's a truly annoying running naration from God knows who throughout these 100 minutes or so of pretty awful dross.

Like a fellow review wisely states watch Apocalypto and not this.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 0 stars10,000 B.C

Londondane from London , 19/03/2008

I don't normally review movies but feel like I have to tell you all this: 10,000 BC has got to be the worst movie I've seen for more than 10 years. The storyline and script is so poor even a 12 year old boy would find it hard to accept it. Don't see this movie unless you want to waste 2 hours of your time after which you'll be left with a feeling that injecting spider eggs under your eye lids would have been more fun. 0 stars, only time I've ever thought that of any movie.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews


* The Amazon.co.uk prices on our site are updated every 24 hours and may not be up to date at the time you view this page.
To see the current new and "new and used" Amazon.co.uk prices, please click on the Buy button.