Skip over navigation

Prince Caspian

Rated - 4 stars

London during the Blitz. For a while it looks like the Pevensie children have wandered into a sequel to Atonement by mistake. Happily they take the tube to Narnia instead, even if they're dismayed to find their old castle at Cair Paravel in ruins. Nazi rockets aren't to blame, just the passage of time.

The four kings and queens have returned from the realms of myth to find their Edenic land overrun by the tyrannical Telmarines (a suspiciously Mediterranean, vaguely Popish lot led by Sergio Castellitto's King Miraz). These corrupt and hard-headed mortals have expelled all the talking animals, the dwarves and the centaurs and the minotaurs, and convinced themselves that trees never talked, Aslan never existed, the world was always as they have made it.

Miraz is not the rightful heir. That would be Caspian (smouldering 26-year-old Ben Barnes) - an enlightened and decidedly eligible prince who falls in with the forest people and rallies an army of the disenfranchised to confront the usurper. Lucy, Edmund, Peter and Susan will stand beside them.

It's not only Hollywood that succumbs to sequelitis. One of the weaker books in the Narnia series, Prince Caspian reads like an uninspired retread of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. But the movie is a marked improvement on the novel, and an altogether more robust, confident enterprise than director Andrew Adamson's previous effort.

At its core are two lengthy battle sequences - the first is an invention of Adamson and his writing partners Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely (You Kill Me); the second a significant elaboration on a mere two pages in the book.

Peter's bold pre-emptive assault on the Telmarine castle is the most exciting set piece in the picture, and would not look out of place beside Peter Jackson's work in The Lord of the Rings - the gold standard for this sort of thing, and the mark which Adamson has set for himself.

The assault founders on the competing pride and ego of the impetuous king and the eager prince - and the bloodshed might have been avoided altogether if the boys had deigned to listen to faithful little Lucy (Georgie Henley), the youngest and purest of Aslan's disciples. In this mythology, the shorter you are the nobler you're likely to prove.

The two most colorful scene-stealers are Reepicheep, a swashbuckling mouse (voiced with splendid gusto by Eddie Izzard), and Peter Dinklage's grumpy dwarf Trumpkin, patronisingly nicknamed 'Dear Little Friend' by the Pevensies or 'DLF', for short. Both bring a welcome dash of humour and irreverence to what is generally a darker, scarier installment.

Live action and digital effects are state of the art. There's a nice detail when a distracted centaur kid is pulled up to attention by his mom - although at one point during the climactic battle Caspian's strategy seems to involve bringing the roof down on the heads of his own cavalry. A few minutes later we're treated to the sorry spectacle of bullish minotaurs in retreat; the pathos all the greater because they're so obviously grown men in costume.

But these are minor distractions. The Chronicles of Narnia still feels a bit like Lord of the Rings in short trousers, but at least Prince Caspian is a step in the right direction. We even get a bonus cameo from Tilda Swinton's White Witch, the standout character in the first movie. Miraz isn't in her league, but there's less sermonizing here, and more than enough action to keep the series afloat for the Voyage of the Dawn Trader 24 months from now.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

Book cinema tickets

More information about Prince Caspian »

Critics' Reviews

Rating of 3 
	  stars out of 5 Wally Hammond, Time Out

Like the second instalments of Peter Jacksons Rings cycle and the Potter films, the latest Narnia adventure... read more on www.timeout.com

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 2 starsNothing there

nutcase from Windermere [Highly rated reviewer] , 28/06/2008

Beware reading a plot outline before you see this - that's all there is. There's no subplot, no character development, no subtlety, no twists. It just is what it is, and takes its time about it. One might even think it was designed for children.

  53 out of 53 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

* * * This review contains spoilers * * *

Rated - 1 starToo bad this is really for children

Picktokyo Picktokyo from London, England [Highly rated reviewer] , 03/07/2008

Well the reviews praise it, but I think it is nowhere good. The movie is a bit slow paced, and plain boring because you know what gonna happen, I believe this movie is only for children (no twist, no bloodlust killings, only showing kids). If you like Lord of the Rings, avoid this movie.

  25 out of 25 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsBetter than the first

A customer from Oldham , 14/06/2008

I saw this film with my nephew a few weeks ago in Toronto before it was released in this UK. I must admit that I was not that impressed with the first film and my nephew thought the same but we both thought this film was a lot better visually (the superior to the UK cinema screen in Toronto could have contributed to this). The storyline and the way the film flowed also didn't seem as babish as the first one and was definately a much more grown up film, especially for a 10 year old boy who thought the first film was a bit girly.

  20 out of 21 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsBrilliant

Charley from Keighley [Highly rated reviewer] , 27/06/2008

This is a brilliant film, I would highly recommend going to see this and renting it again. You would be able to follow the story if you hadn't read or seen the 'The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe' although I would probably recommend seeing The Lion first and then watching this. The graphic's are better, acting is better and all in all it is a much better film, but I loved the first one as it took me back to me child hood, go see this at the cinema it is well worth the experience.

I went watch this at my local theatre on opening night and the cinema was pretty much empty which made the whole experience even better.

  14 out of 14 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 5 starsFollows on and doesnt dissapoint

PaulaWestwood from Ashton-Under-Lyne [Highly rated reviewer] , 04/07/2008

I have to start by stating Chronicles is one of my top 10 movies, and the anticipation of Caspian was whether it would be as good, even better if possible or worse a dissapointment. Based on 1 year later in London time and over 1000 years gone by in Narnia, the fable continues with a ruined Narnia lorded over by a corrupt king, and it is up to the Pevensies to try to turn the whole situation around. I am happy to report the whole thing was as huge and entertaining as Chronicles. For me these films are the absolute ultimate in family entertainment... Bring on the next !!!!

  3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

* * * This review contains spoilers * * *

Rated - 1 starToo bad this is really for children

Picktokyo Picktokyo from London, England [Highly rated reviewer] , 03/07/2008

Well the reviews praise it, but I think it is nowhere good. The movie is a bit slow paced, and plain boring because you know what gonna happen, I believe this movie is only for children (no twist, no bloodlust killings, only showing kids). If you like Lord of the Rings, avoid this movie.

  25 out of 25 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews