Skip over navigation

Body of Lies

Rated - 3 stars

As topical as the next terrorist attack, Ridley Scott’s CIA thriller has all the ingredients of a powerhouse movie, but it takes an awfully long time to cook.

Scripted by William Monaghan (who wrote The Departed and Kingdom of Heaven) from a novel by David Ignatius (like Monaghan, a political journalist), the movie aspires to be less James Bond and more Syriana – with a handful of Jason Bourne set pieces thrown in. But while it does have some shrewd things to say about the state of the so-called war on terror, in the end it doesn’t have the depth or the excitement to do justice to either ambition.

DiCaprio and Crowe: those names look good together on the poster, and when the movie brings them together, yes, they do bring up their game. But mostly they’re exchanging barbs in different time zones and on different continents. Crowe might as well be playing a telephonist.

Instead he’s Ed Hoffman, the senior CIA supervisor tasked with keeping the world safe for democracy and an eye on DiCaprio’s field agent, Roger Ferris, a Middle East specialist who roams between Iraq, Syria, Dubai, Turkey and Jordan. While Ferris is often enough in the line of fire, Hoffman usually has his feet up on his desk; or he’s grumpily driving his kids to their next appointment. Even so, he’s the reactionary Republican type, and Ferris, he begins to suspect, is a bit of a bleeding heart: “You need to decide which side of the cross you’re on,” he warns him. “I need nailers, not hangers.”

Definitely an Obama man, Ferris takes a more nuanced view. He is all for talking to terrorists first, and not shooting them unless it’s absolutely necessary. He speaks Arabic, wears a scrawny beard to fit in, and in one of the movie’s more aggravating miscalculations, he starts courting a nurse, Aisha (Golshifteh Farahani), whose main function is to prove that Arabs aren’t just people; they’re also convenient pawns when it comes to engineering a good old fashioned melodramatic ending.

This love story never feels real and only makes Ferris look naïve. It’s also unnecessary, because we can already see that the agent is smitten with Jordanian security chief Hani – played by the British actor Mark Strong (last seen as Tom Wilkinson’s right hand man in RocknRolla). Poised and debonair, Strong not only outclasses his two more famous costars, he also delivers a convincing demonstration of what a genuinely smart anti-Terrorist policy would look like – one where bribery replaces torture as the key to intelligence-gathering. All he asks of Ferris in return for cooperation is complete honesty – now why would a CIA man have a problem with that?

Scott has such a good time showing off all the latest hi-tech spy surveillance gadgetry and laying out the geopolitical complexities of this arena that it’s well into the second half before the plot gets going. With the help of computer whiz Simon McBurney, Ferris sets up an innocent architect as a rival terrorist mastermind, figuring this will flush out the genuine al-Qaeda fish that they’re really after. It’s an ingenious idea in as far as it goes, but it’s a bit ridiculous that a terrorist would leave his email address after a bombing, and Ferris doesn’t seem to have thought through the consequences.

The pay-off also comes up short: it’s a post 9/11 variation on the heroine kidnapped by the bad guy and tied to the railway tracks. With a little torture and beheading on the side.

So is Body Of Lies worth seeing? Well, as you would expect from Ridley Scott, it looks superb. It’s good to see DiCaprio and Crowe together again for the first time since The Quick And The Dead (and how long ago that feels!), even if their scenes together are too few and far between. Mark Strong makes a vivid impression – the kind that will probably propel him into a lot more big budget movies (I could see him as a Bond villain). And it’s good to see a thriller with a more sophisticated view of the Islamic world than just “them and us”. If I’ve succeeded in lowering your expectations some, then you’ll probably enjoy it all the more.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about Body of Lies »

Critics' Reviews

Rating of 3 
	  stars out of 5 Trevor Johnston, Time Out

Ever had the feeling your boss doesnt have your best interests at heart? The stakes are certainly high for Leonardo... read more on www.timeout.com

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 5 starsPerfection

DirtyHarry DirtyHarry from HARROGATE [Highly rated reviewer] , 17/10/2008

Non-stop drama as events unfold. Say what you want, but please don't label this as more US propaganda material. It is unbiased and open in its approach, and is quite revealing in portraying both sides of the story in telling what resources (and deceipt) go into tracking terrorist cells and what very likely happens politically behind closed doors. Leonardo DiCaprio finally came of age in Blood Diamond, and here he just gets better, and more convincing. Job well done!

  132 out of 133 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsBadass pettish pointy little eyebrows

A customer from Cambridge , 07/11/2008

Doesn't Leonardo diCaprio always have badass pettish pointy little eyebrows? Hollywood so wants to manufacture for us a mean Italianamerican method actor, but Leo just ain't a Brando. Not even Ridley Scott and Crowe can save this one. DiCaprio just can't hold the film's strands together. The guy has no charisma. His early performances in This Boy's Life and Gilbert Grape must have been flukes, or perhaps he suited those adolescent roles. These days he still looks like a pettish adolescent with pointy little eyebrows and a sulky frown and it just doesn't work. Where are the iconic actors of yesteryear?

  35 out of 39 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsA plot that leaves you thinking 'what?'

A customer from Cheltenham , 29/11/2008

Not a bad little effort this one, although the trailers lead you to believe this is something it is not. From the previews I thought this would be a revenge/redemption type plot but instead it seems drawn out (at over 2 hours it is slightly butt-numbing after 30mins of ads at the start). It is interesting though, DiCaprio resumes his bad ass type role we saw in Blood Diamond. Something he's nailed down to an art. There are some unflattering shots of Russel Crowe who is looking his age a bit. The two of them string the piece together quite well. The only thing that would stop me renting this or watching it again is how epic and harrowing it is. A couple of scenes definitely not for the squeamish.

All in all: ok

  21 out of 21 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsBODY OF LIES

A customer from FURNERS GREEN , 03/12/2008

Yes, a very professional film that ticked all the boxes. Very controlled and well edited ,well everything really but unfortunately very lack luster. Liked Brit actor Mark Strong as Hani as well as his great clothes.Great showcase for Russell Crowes laid back acting skills but Leo was very like his Blood Diamond character with a bit more feeling,I much prefer his Catch Me If You Can character than his action hero one.Maybe that was why I was the only woman in the audience.If you're in London check out The Apollo cinema in Piccadilly.

  15 out of 15 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 2 starsWhat was the Fuss About?

retep from London [Highly rated reviewer] , 21/04/2009

This movie is well shot there is plenty of action, but unfortunately the plot is very weak and what there is does not link together in a plausible way. Also there was really nothing new. The supposed love story is a nothing and for the central character to risk life and limb for someone that he does not know at all, is fanciful. Regrettably by the end the audience will not know why, and mostly probably will not care.

This film does not even approach the talent of Titanic, a great shame.

  3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 2 starsBody of Lies

gepete80 gepete80 from London [Highly rated reviewer] , 23/02/2009

I can see it now. 2010 and in DVD stores everywhere the latest boxsets hit the shelves in time for Christmas. One of them is a 6 disc set entitled Crowe/Scott: A Decade of Collaboration. Ok so far they have only done 4, but with Nottingham in production theres always chance that they can sneak in another before the back end of ’10. Obviously the high point would be Gladiator, the one that launched Crowe in to the world of the A-List and endless parody.

The low point is a hard one to gauge as I haven’t seen A Good Year but of the ones I have seen this might be it. Not to say that it is bad, as it isn’t by a long shot, but Body of Lies is ineffectual stuff in comparison to their other works. It may also be representative of a bit of a trait that has been occurring in movies for a while, namely a directors long affiliation with one actor. The gold gets struck, and then they continue onwards as surely lightning can strike twice. However rather like Clooney and Soderburgh it works for a couple of movies and then steadily begins to drop off to the point that no ones bothered.

Its called ‘feet under the table’ syndrome. Its not necessarily a bad thing but you get so caught up in your safety blanket you fail to realise that your no longer pushing boundaries or trying out anything that’s new. It just becomes standard, predictable and ultimately unadventurous. Body of Lies could have been a standard bearer, exciting and full of insight in to the current conflict in the Middle East but ends up just plodding.

In effect, Body of Lies is almost a copy of Tony Scott’s Spy Game but in that film Redford and Pitt are given some semblance of a back history. In this all we know is that Crowe’s character is a CIA boss who has to make some tough calls from the safety of his Washington office while the ambitious Leo Di Cap does all the donkey work on the ground. And here in lies its difficulty in that by not really setting up the characters you are given no real incentive to become emotionally connected to them. This was something Spy Game did brilliantly well and made that the better of the 2 films.

Body of Lies can be frustrating at times. You can follow whats happening, understand the reasons for it, but because there is no semblance of connection or indeed presence (most orders come over the mobile) you struggle to care. Even when they do meet face to face and have a difference of opinion there seems to be really no spark unlike in American Gangster where Crowe and Washington had plenty.

So in all the movie washes over you rather then challenges you and becomes just another forgettable thriller. A shame considering the big names involved and the topic. If Scott and Crow continue to make movies in the same safe, unimaginative manner as this one then I can imagine that that DVD boxset will actually be on sale for the pricely sum of £4.99…..

  13 out of 16 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews