Skip over navigation

Australia

Rated - 2 stars

Bad movies come in all shapes and sizes. This one is a doozy, a big, sweeping national epic that cost Rupert Murdoch’s Twentieth Century Fox an arm and a leg ($130 million) and which has been hobbled by its weak US showing. Of course it’s doing nicely down under, but the real question is: what will the rest of the world make of it?

And that’s a bit of a head-scratcher. Writer-director Baz Luhrmann has enjoyed a Midas touch up to now, tapping popular acclaim with his so-called “Red Curtain Trilogy”: Strictly Ballroom, William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and Moulin Rouge. These are romantic, even sentimental love stories, packaged in day-glo camp, but told with such verve and machine gun editing they don’t register as ironic. Luhrmann is straight, and all these films are heterosexual love stories, but it’s a gay sensibility: bigger, brighter and louder than life, playful but emotional.

It’s been seven years since Moulin Rouge and in theory Luhrmann has put the post-modern kitsch on mothballs and turned to a different mode, although quite which mode that would be isn’t clear, either to us or, I suspect, to him. Australia is a rum business: an old fashioned melodrama that’s part romance, part Western, part war movie, served up with broad comedy and a self-conscious nod and a wink. Yet at the same time, it wears its heart on its sleeve, and you better believe it’s purple.

The year is… confusing: 1939, or thereabouts. Nicole Kidman plays English aristocrat Lady Sarah Ashley, a character as caricatured as that name suggests. She’s a snob, instinctively racist, and certainly not used to getting her gloves dirty – but she journeys halfway around the world to track down her husband who has gone native, cattle farming in Western Australia. Trouble is, she arrives at “Faraway Downs” to find the Lord has already departed - with a spear in his back.

If Luhrmann has proved adept at mashing genres in the past, this time he’s come off second (or third) best. His screenplay was co-written over the years with Stuart Beattie, Ronald Harwood and Richard Flanagan, which may be why it feels like at least three movies laid on top of each other. The structure is an awful mess. A voice over narration by Nullah (Brandon Walters) is an obvious gesture towards political reparation, but a dubious device in storytelling terms, not least because Nullah is prone to sentences like this one: “Miss Boss! We gotta get those fat cheeky bulls in that big bloody metal ship!”

As it happens, that line sets up the plot of the first two hours or so, which is basically a Red River style cattle drive across the outback to the port at Darwin, where the herd will go to feed the war effort. “Miss Boss”, meanwhile has to contend with rustlers and wreckers, heat and dust, and a particularly distracting paragon of Aussie beefcake – the drover called “Drover” (Hugh Jackman).

1939 was the year of Gone with the Wind and The Wizard Of Oz, and Luhrmann seeks inspiration from both of them. Lady Sarah is a little bit Scarlett O’Hara, and maybe a smidgeon or two of Katharine Hepburn in The African Queen; Drover is quite a lot Rhett Butler, rugged and distant, while the reliably repellent David Wenham might as well be basing his portrait of an ambitious rival on the Wicked Witch of the West.

Give or take a CGI stampede and a telegraphed kangaroo killing, Luhrmann shoots the movie in the corny stylings of the Hollywood studio era. That’s a mistake. Victor Fleming and David O Selznick didn’t intend to be corny, and in fact their movies hold up extremely well 70 years on. In contract, Luhrmann’s self-conscious and condescending concoction doesn’t hold up for 7 minutes (let alone 165 of them). His ethnic caricatures are knowing, but they’re not funny (a Chinese cook called Sing Song?).

Luhrmann means to apologize for the burden of racial guilt that comes with being Australian (recommended further viewing: Rabbit Proof Fence) but at the same time he indulges in all manner of mystic mumbo-jumbo where Nullah is concerned. And in any case, this theme is clumsily integrated with the main romance.

Neither Kidman nor Jackman seems at ease, but it’s easier for Jackman, he’s allowed heroics – saving abandoned aboriginal kids from the Japanese army, for instance. Lady Sarah is invariably sidelined when the action hots up, and when she is called upon to stand up she usually does the wrong thing. It’s as if Scarlett kept trying to sell Tara to the nearest carpetbagger. Kidman can be a terrific actress, but she’s not well served by her collaborators here. A scene in which she tries to comfort Nullah with a rendition of “Over the Rainbow” from The Wizard of Oz is just plain embarrassing.

It’s a more grievous miscalculation that the movie reaches a climax about two hours in, only to dig in for another hour of wartime drama. As it happens, this last hour is an improvement on the first, but it certainly feels like a long haul – and it’s not like the movie is going anywhere unexpected.

Australia is too bombastic to deserve a free pass. It’s awful tosh, but if you go with it you might enjoy the ride – at least, more than I did. I’m giving it two stars out of five: one for ambition, one for effort, and zero for the rest. I couldn’t wait for it to be over.

Tom Charity
tom.charity@lovefilm.com

View Details

More information about Australia »

Members' Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

* * * This review contains spoilers * * *

Rated - 4 starsBeautiful scenery and people... and a very Mills and Boon storyline

A customer from CARDIFF , 19/12/2008

In the film, Kidman plays a widowed English aristocrat in the 1930s, who comes to northern Australia to sell a cattle property the size of Belgium. She becomes caught in the bombing of Darwin during World War II with a drover played by Jackman.

I saw the Welsh premiere last night and both my 99 year old Nan and I thoroughly enjoyed the film. The cinematography is amazing and a great advert for the country. The audience swooned every time Hugh Jackman graced the screen and it is obvious that Baz Luhrman exploits the actor's physique and good looks for all he's worth. We loved that but many male viewers may squirm at its cheesiness.

Whilst the film did not go into as much depth as 'The Rabbit Proof Fence' regarding the stolen generation of aboriginals who were separated from their families by the government, it served as a basic introduction to the indiginous culture of the Northern Territories.

Nicole Kidman was stunning throughout and her character's love for the Drover and the talented child star Brandon Walters was very believable. It was also interesting to learn that Australia was invaded during the war.

The main failing of the film was its melodramatic storyline. Bizzarely, 'Australia' reminded me of the classic TV series 'The Wacky Races' as throughout the film, a Dick Dastardly - style baddie kept being outwitted by Lady Sarah and her team. It was almost comedic in the way that just when yet another character died and you thought she would be on the next flight home to Blighty, miraculously everything would work out for her.

  118 out of 119 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsMuch better entertainment than the high-minded critics would have you think

wreeve wreeve from London NW3 [Highly rated reviewer] , 24/12/2008

I saw this film in Australia, where it gets a critical panning - extending to a full-page diatribe from the dreadful Germaine Greer. I saw the film regardless, and thoroughly enjoyed it.

I was reminded of Titanic, another film I saw despite low expectations, and left the cinema feeling pleasantly surprised. Titanic was a huge critical success, so I obviously wasn't the only person who enjoyed it.

Australia has enough weaknesses for the critics to go at. The one that particularly irks me is the fake 'documentary' element to it - i.e. it portrays its background as being factually accurate. Which it isn't; Germaine Greer gets upset about the portrayal of Aborigines (which I don't know anything about) but even I know that Japanese soldiers did *not* in fact invade Australia tho they certainly did viciously bomb Darwin. But this is a niggle - the plot does not stand or fall on these innaccuracies.

But the strengths of the movie are several. Starting with the acting. The half-Aboriginal kid does indeed steal the show - he is great and we all hope to see more of him. Nicole, who I think is fantastic, was not at her best but is nonetheless very good. Hugh Jackman is also very solid in a broadly undemanding role, tho I agree with the reviewer who said that male members of the audience may find director Baz Luhrman's exploitation of Jackman's 'phwoar' looks and torso a bit cheesy.

The story is predictable - but, hey, I enjoyed Titanic right? - and a bit longwinded, but no less enjoyable for all that. The King George character adds a few twists and turns and, despite saying very little, is one of the most memorable parts I've seen played in ages.

The scenery is terrific and the 'stampede scene' is really mesmerising for all its obvious CGI-ness. 'nuff said.

Overall this was a very enjoyable drama/western/rom-com with an edge - Australia - that few other films of the moment can match. It won't win any Oscars but it will entertain you, in a wonderfully widescreen way.

  40 out of 42 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsAustralia

A customer from Sutton Coldfield , 08/01/2009

It's clear that most critics have some sort of axe to grind when writing about a film, and to take their comments at face value means a lot of wasted time viewing utter pretentious rubbish, and missing out on some very watchable and entertaining films. My wife and I are in our early fifties and we loved Australia. Our daughter is 22 and she and her similarly aged friends also loved the film (in fact we went to see it on their recommendation). It's a long film, but because it is so good and so beautifully filmed, the time flew. The chances are you will thoroughly enjoy this film, so don't be put off by an adverse review!

  20 out of 20 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

* * * This review contains spoilers * * *

Rated - 3 starsA wide sweep of emptiness

A customer from Enfield , 28/12/2008

I used to think I enjoyed Baz Luhrman's earlier films but on repeated watching I seemed to have tired of the overblown techniques that captured and even enraptured me when these films were first seen in the cinema. 'Australia' is just too expansive and exaggerated, it tries too hard to be the epic it is not, and uses the mysteries of the Aboriginal culture to gloss over some truly obvious and cliched aspects of the plot, such as it is.

Nevertheless I enjoyed it for what is was, and loved the performance from the young Brandon Walters as the 'half-caste' boy at the centre of the story. Hugh Jackman is handsome and rugged as the local cattle drover who refuses, until the Lady (Kidman) turns up, to be attached to anything or anyone, but his performance is limited in depth, although with a role as superficial as it is, it was probably all that could be asked of him. Nicole Kidman's character is one of a similarly stereotypical well brought up naive English Lady who within days seems able to deal with herding cattle across a desert in a swirling dust storm and a spiteful cattle baron trying to destroy the farm she inherits from her deceased husband, but I thought she did better with the role than Jackman did.

My advice is just to sit back and relax and enjoy the ride, as you will in all likelihood not want to see it again, and certainly not on a small screen....

  18 out of 18 people found this review helpful

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 5 starsAmazing Australia

A customer from Plymouth , 31/12/2008

I was stunned by this wonderful film. It is a glimpse of Australia with the touch of: romance, action, the sad past of the aboriginees and the war. Not to mention Nicole Kidman's excellent performance - crikey!

  13 out of 13 people found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 3 starsEnjoyable but not an epic

Cathy from Uckfield, Sussex [Highly rated reviewer] , 25/05/2009

Firstly, the title of the film annoyed me. Naming a film 'Australia' gives the impressiion that it is about the history of Australia. In essence it is a film just based in Australia, however I can understand that it is playing homage to the country but nonetheless, I thought it was a silly title. Secondly, Hugh Jackman's torso is fabulous. Thirdly the film is too long.

Apart from the above, I did enjoy the film. It nearly verges onto a masterpiece but doesnt quite make it. It was missing something.

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

Read all highest rated reviews