A scientific expedition sets out for Borneo to seek a flower called the Blood Orchid, which could grant longer life. Meanwhile, they run afoul of snakes and each other. Read more
| Starring | Johnny Messner, Morris Chestnut, Kadee Strickland, Matthew Marsden |
|---|---|
| Director | Dwight Little |
| Genres | Horror |
loading...
It may have been daft fun, but did 1997's Anaconda really warrant a sequel? Watching this bargain bin film-making, the answer is a resounding no. In reality, anacondas aren't found in the jungles of Borneo, but here the giant serpents prey on scientists who are scouring the area for a rare orchid with youth-preserving qualities. For a movie that promises major snake nastiness, it takes an age for the predators to slither into action, and even then abysmal special effects render their activities ridiculous. Despite being labelled a horror thriller, there's nothing to set pulses pounding, while the largely unrecognisable cast members (Coronation Street's Matthew Marsden notwithstanding) are as risible as their dialogue. Had the feature been tongue-in-cheek like the original, it might have worked. Unfortunately, director Dwight H Little takes the whole ludicrous affair far too seriously.
A moribund sequel to Anaconda that could do with that movie's over-the-top performance by Jon Voight, though the crocodiles and snakes do chew the scenery every now and then.
Anaconda was quite a good film - what happened with this sequal?!?!? The story line was non existant the acting was wooden and the effects well a bit of a larger budget would not have been a bad idea.
Avoid this film at all costs.
I was hoping for an improvement on the appalling 'Anaconda' with this sequel. I mean, it couldn't get worse than Jon Voight's dodgy accent, reversed film that made the waterfall go upwards and wooden acting could it? The bad news is, yes it could. 'Anacondas - The Hunt Fof Blood Orchid' uses actors that are so bad that I think they must have gone to the same acting school as the Eastenders cast. Then there is the annoying screams right throughout the film from one of the MALES! If he said 'Son of a bitch' one more time, I think I would have screamed myself. Poor Dialogue (Four word sentences!), poor acting, a lack of Anaconda scenes which, when they did come were very bad CGI and a rotton script. The only good actor in this was the ship owner's spider monkey!
This movie is just as good as the first movie but with a little twist at the end...
This movie is just as good as the first movie but with a little twist at the end...
I was hoping for an improvement on the appalling 'Anaconda' with this sequel. I mean, it couldn't get worse than Jon Voight's dodgy accent, reversed film that made the waterfall go upwards and wooden acting could it? The bad news is, yes it could. 'Anacondas - The Hunt Fof Blood Orchid' uses actors that are so bad that I think they must have gone to the same acting school as the Eastenders cast. Then there is the annoying screams right throughout the film from one of the MALES! If he said 'Son of a bitch' one more time, I think I would have screamed myself. Poor Dialogue (Four word sentences!), poor acting, a lack of Anaconda scenes which, when they did come were very bad CGI and a rotton script. The only good actor in this was the ship owner's spider monkey!
Anaconda was quite a good film - what happened with this sequal?!?!? The story line was non existant the acting was wooden and the effects well a bit of a larger budget would not have been a bad idea.
Avoid this film at all costs.
I was hoping for an improvement on the appalling 'Anaconda' with this sequel. I mean, it couldn't get worse than Jon Voight's dodgy accent, reversed film that made the waterfall go upwards and wooden acting could it? The bad news is, yes it could. 'Anacondas - The Hunt Fof Blood Orchid' uses actors that are so bad that I think they must have gone to the same acting school as the Eastenders cast. Then there is the annoying screams right throughout the film from one of the MALES! If he said 'Son of a bitch' one more time, I think I would have screamed myself. Poor Dialogue (Four word sentences!), poor acting, a lack of Anaconda scenes which, when they did come were very bad CGI and a rotton script. The only good actor in this was the ship owner's spider monkey!
This movie is just as good as the first movie but with a little twist at the end...
If you loved Indiana Jones, or just want a good film that's going to fill up an evening but don't want to change your life, watch this! Its ace!! I saw it at the cinema and its just a good old-fashioned thriller.
this movie is just a load of poo please please do not rent! if you do im be very very mad! lol
The first Ananconda film was an unadulterated joy, a B movie with a Hollywood budget, a raft of recognisable faces and, the true star of the show, Jon Voight slicing the ham thickly as the trapper hell bent on snagging himself a 40 foot long CGI snake.
This film lacks any of the above, it is hampered severely by its budget and tries amiably to scare, but the kiddie friendly certificate ensures that we see very little of the carnage the snakes can conjure up. The cast is made up of complete nobodies, and you can tick off the check list of cliche characters. The hunky ex Army man with a chequered past, the spunky attractive scientist, the comic relief wise-acre homeboy, the slimy English guy...they're all here. But the film fails to deliver any of its promises and ends up being another pointless creature feature where the creature looks like a draught excluder.
Avoid. I beg you, avoid.
Now the orginal was nothing to shout home about so you'd think the producers of this damp squib of a sequel had a platform to learn from. Unfortunately the producers decided to go the other way and create an even worse piece of work (if that's possible). The original was enjoyable in a camp B-movie sort of way. This one however manages to remove any hint of a B-movie but hardly ever showing what the audience have rented the DVD for in the first place.
Aside from a slightly icky ending involving a nest of Anaconda's the film plods along without a hit of tension or any laughs.
Actually enjoyed this film & it kept me watching till the end, very good! :o)
One of the worst films i have ever seen and i have seen plenty films. Makes part one look like oscar material...
Pathetic and predictable, I would urge you not to waste your time with this one.
It may have been daft fun, but did 1997's Anaconda really warrant a sequel? Watching this bargain bin film-making, the answer is a resounding no. In reality, anacondas aren't found in the jungles of Borneo, but here the giant serpents prey on scientists who are scouring the area for a rare orchid with youth-preserving qualities. For a movie that promises major snake nastiness, it takes an age for the predators to slither into action, and even then abysmal special effects render their activities ridiculous. Despite being labelled a horror thriller, there's nothing to set pulses pounding, while the largely unrecognisable cast members (Coronation Street's Matthew Marsden notwithstanding) are as risible as their dialogue. Had the feature been tongue-in-cheek like the original, it might have worked. Unfortunately, director Dwight H Little takes the whole ludicrous affair far too seriously.
A moribund sequel to Anaconda that could do with that movie's over-the-top performance by Jon Voight, though the crocodiles and snakes do chew the scenery every now and then.