Director Otto Preminger thrives in tense legal showdowns and this is perhaps his best, mostly for Jimmy Stewart's cagey performance as a deceptively wily small-town lawyer. The sensationalist trial revolves around an army lieutenant who shoots a bar owner for allegedly raping his wife, an ugly crime in which no one is wholly .. Read more
| Starring | James Stewart, Lee Remick, Ben Gazzara, Arthur O'Connell |
|---|---|
| Director | Otto Preminger |
| Genres | Drama |
loading...
Director Otto Preminger thrives in tense legal showdowns and this is perhaps his best, mostly for Jimmy Stewart's cagey performance as a deceptively wily small-town lawyer. The sensationalist trial revolves around an army lieutenant who shoots a bar owner for allegedly raping his wife, an ugly crime in which no one is wholly guilty or innocent. Based on Robert Travers' novel. Score (and onscreen appearance) by Duke Ellington. Academy Award Nominations: 7, including Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor--James Stewart, Best (Adapted) Screenplay.
| Starring | James Stewart, Lee Remick, Ben Gazzara, Arthur O'Connell, Eve Arden, Kathryn Grant, George C. Scott |
|---|---|
| Director | Otto Preminger |
| Studio | SONY PICTURES HOME ENTERTAINMENT |
| Run time | DVD: 2 hrs 41 mins |
| Certificate | |
| Genres | Drama |
| Language | DVD: English |
| Dubbed | French, German, Italian, Spanish |
| Subtitles | DVD: Arabic, Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Icelandic, Italian, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, Turkish |
| Released | DVD: 20 Aug 2001 Production year: 1959 |
| Format | DVD |
This is probably the greatest courtroom drama ever made, and it features James Stewart's finest screen performance. Controversial in its day for using words such as panties and spermatogenesis, Otto Preminger's film gives you an irresistible impulse to watch for nearly three hours as its story about a rape and murder unfolds. As the country hick lawyer (and jazz fan) Paul Biegler, Stewart is drawn into the case, suckered by it, and comes up against big-town prosecutor George C Scott. Their courtroom duels and stunts are mesmerising as they show us America leaving its traditional old-time moral values behind: this is the America not of apple pie but of Lolita. The judge, by the way, is played by Joseph N Welch, a Boston lawyer and outspoken critic of the McCarthyist witch-hunts, who got the part after Spencer Tracy and Burl Ives turned it down. That Stewart's character loves jazz was a neat excuse to bring in the great Duke Ellington to write the soundtrack, and Ellington even appears in one scene in a club, playing a duet with Stewart. The film is based on a novel by Robert Traver, the pen name of retired judge John D Voelker.
Overlong and over-faithful version of a highly detailed courtroom bestseller. The plot is necessarily equivocal, the characterizations overblown, but the trial commands some interest, and the use of 'daring' words in evidence caused controversy at the tim
I put this on my list to rent because; well.. it's Jimmy Stewart; and I want to see all of his stuff.. eventually.
When it arrived I wasn't too fussed, and was put out by the 2hr 40min length. But I shoved it on and... WOW! WOW WOW WOW! This is incredible. This is how a story should be told.
We've all seem hundreds of courtroom dramas before; most of them are enjoyable enough because of the predictable good guy v bad guy stuff, all the courtroom trickery. What makes Anatomy great is the depth of it all; when they are eventually in court; we feel we know the murder, and the characters inside out. It makes for compelling viewing, and Stewart is at his finest.
PLEASE RENT THIS!
Dan
This is indeed a terrific court room drama with superb writing and performances. I was a little bit underwhelmed by the ending though after having invested 2.5hours+ in the film. With such great court room drama and banter between Jimmy Stewart and George C Scott I was expecting a neat little climax but it ended quite quickly and unexpectedly. No final speeches or twists, which I suppose could be seen as a plus point in that it doesn't follow what now could be seens as cliched convention. On reflection, it's not that kind of story anyway as the viewer is pretty much aware of the cirumstances of the case and the purpetrator before the courtroom scenes even begin. Instead, the story is more about how a defence can be created and an insanity plea used to acquit a guilty man from an arguably justifiable homicide. An unusually cynical and entertaining courtroom drama.