Blow Up details

Blow Up
Format: 15 DVD
Starring: The Yardbirds, Sarah Miles, Sarah Miles, David Hemmings, Vanessa Redgrave
Director: Michelangelo Antonioni
Genre: Drama - General
Studio: WARNER HOME VIDEO
Collections: April Picks, Exclusive!, November Picks
Name Discs
Blow Up
15 Feature

DVD Information

Run time: 1 hour 46 minutes
Rental release: 12 Apr 2004
Main languages: English
Write your own review

Most helpful review Blow Up

  • nonsense...

    Rated - 1.0 star  
    By a customer from Hove , 30 Jun 2008

    THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS Show review anywayHide

    [Highly rated reviewer]

    The only reason that this film deserves the one star, is that the premise is quite good and could have made a decent thriller. 'Blow Out' by dePalma nearly hit the mark, but this film is an exercise in tedium. It is bloated, pretentious, arrogant nonsense and deserves no acclaim whatsoever. So what if the cinematography is good? I mean it wasn't, but even if it did have that going for it, you can dress up sh!t as much as you like, but at the end of the day it will still be just sh!t. The scene where David Hemmings ends up at a Yardbirds gig is so contrived and made me want to punch everyone involved. 'hey kids look how cool we are and look how hip we are to the london scene' - utter tosh. Unless you're a 15 year old art student, who's taken to wearing feather boas and white winkle pickers (you know who you are!) I suggest you avoid this one, like you would your hairy grandmother's wet kisses. If, however, you like to pick up (straight to DVD) DVD's for 50p at your local charity shop's bargain bucket, to laugh and guffaw at some of the worst films ever made, then this one's a winner - it had me in stitches.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (30) Yes |
    •  No (23)

All reviews

(73)
  • Mmm, it's famous but should you bother?

    Rated - 2.0 stars  
    By margo_channing (12 reviews) , 01 Sep 2012
    Glad I've seen it. And strangely, some bits have stuck in my mind since. I'm not an obsessive of the sixties and found the datedness of the movie offputting, but there must have been something about it that it is still popping up. The main protagonist isn't a particularly nice man, and that's the point, he's bored with himself and bored with his art. But it is always harder to connect with a film when you don't like the person you're watching. I think there are other films that probably explore this idea better but damned if I can name them now, so see it for yourself, make your own mind up.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (2)
  • Nice props

    Rated - 4.0 stars  
    By TobyMadrigal (1 review) , 26 Jun 2012
    I've always liked this film, the 'Chinese eye' - (so called because of the arrangment of the headlamps) on the Rolls kept me watching it time and again. The car radio telephone system is a relic in itself. I remember them in use in the North in the 60s, it was called: 'Aircall.'

    If you look on eBay under Nikon F camera, some sellers of chrome Nikon F cameras with the non-metering head will tell you that you too can be just like David Hemmings in blowup!

    Based on Bailey ( albeit very loosely) Bailey commented on it on TV not long ago saying he still had the propeller!
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • Interesting of its time

    Rated - 4.0 stars  
    By a customer from Hertfordshire , 05 Apr 2012
    ...but it's not quite as good as it looks at first glance.

    You keep watching because the style and characterisation are interesting. But it's spoiled by a 60s self-importance that makes it linger where it should be moving on, and the characters don't draw you in as they should.

    You feel it was made for itself, not for its audience.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (1)
  • Blow (it) up

    Rated - 0.5 stars  
    By Fakirkbairn (10 reviews) from Hertford , 29 Feb 2012
    I didn't enjoy this film at all - it took so long to get going that I quickly became bored with it and turned it off. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (1) Yes |
    •  No (7)
  • Look Harder

    Rated - 4.0 stars  
    By Breathe (40 reviews) from Leeds , 25 Jan 2012
    I have always admired writers and directors who allow the audience to think for themselves, who somehow manage to create a piece of fiction which can be perceived in many different ways.

    This certainly came under that category, and I wasn't surprised to read negative reviews accusing this movie of being boring and too slow. This is, pure and simple, a signature movie, made by an artist no different than the men and women who cut cows in half or throw paint at a white canvas. The trouble with that is, it certainly won't be to the taste of viewers who want an easy ride, hence the negativity towards it.

    In my opinion, this is a movie which deserves and needs a viewers concentration and patience, because like the mime artists playing tennis at the end, if you look hard enough, you may see what you want to see.

    I certainly did.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (5) Yes |
    •  No (0)
 

Agree or disagree? Write your own review

Please sign in to LOVEFiLM to write your review

Sign in to LOVEFiLM

Not a member yet?

Sign up to start your 30-day FREE trial