It would be difficult to top the phenomenal success of BRIDGET JONES' DIARY, but the sequel certainly pulls it off. The incomparable Renee Zellweger (JERRY MACGUIRE, COLD MOUNTAIN) once again breathes hilarious life into the flawed heroine who sent her career soaring. This instalment of Bridget's journal finds her dealing with .. Read more
| Starring | Renee Zellweger, Colin Firth, Hugh Grant, Jim Broadbent |
|---|---|
| Director | Beeban Kidron |
| Genres | Comedy, Romance |
loading...
The reasoning behind this sequel is obvious after the huge success of 2001's Bridget Jones's Diary, and the makers aren't taking any risks by deviating from the winning formula. Viewers might even suspect the projectionist of screening the first film by mistake, for the sequel again opens with gormless but lovable Bridget (Renée Zellweger) arriving for a Christmas family reunion. Except now she is no longer single, having hooked the dishy but taciturn lawyer Mark Darcy (Colin Firth). It's not long, however, before they're squabbling over such personal foibles as Mark's habit of folding his boxer shorts before going to bed, so Bridget heads off to Thailand to compile a travel programme with handsome cad Daniel Cleaver (Hugh Grant). The characterisations are once more excellent, so it's unfortunate that the scriptwriters (including Richard Curtis and the book's author, Helen Fielding) felt it necessary to revisit jokes from the original, and even expect laughs every time a character falls over or gets wet. Bridget Jones — as a character and first film — maintained a fine balance between the amusing and the tiresome. The sequel tilts this balance too far at times but, if you can ignore the many similarities, you may still laugh your socks off.
The mixture is much as before in this sequel, but unfortunately, it does not benefit from repetition; it's bright and cheerful, though.
Ill admit it: I never caught the first Bridget Jones movie and so cant fully compare this sequel to the... read more on Time Out
I'm a big fan of the Bridget Jones books, and thought the first film was very good. However, I've just seen the second one and it was rubbish. The entire story has been changed from the book, for the worse, so I don't know why they've even called it the Edge of Reason. All the subtletly has been taken away and they've ended up with a cheesey, try to appeal to the lowest common denominator film which I think I only laughed in twice. Colin Firth and Renee Zellwegger played their parts very well, such a shame they had such a bad script to work with. True Bridget fans beware!!
I laughed once throughout the whole of this film. It's thoroughly predictable and incredibly boring. I would not recommend it.
Saw the first one and even my husband agreed it was funny (not a big fan of 'womens films!' This one was just awful. Painfully unfunny and I though Renee Zellweger was pretty bad too - a lot of simpering and cutsey face pulling does not make a film funny - and neither does adopting a silly walk. The only time we laughed out loud was in the fight scene, which was basically a re-enactment of the first film. A lot of references to shagging and the liberal use of f*** was just plain embarrassing and unneccessary.
Having loved the first Bridget Jones film and seen all the hype about this one, I had high hopes for it. Sadly I was disappointed. I struggled to finish the film at all, it just wasn't funny and lacked the warmth and feel good factor of the first film.
What a let down.
Not as good as Bridget Jones Diary but still worth watching
I'm a big fan of the Bridget Jones books, and thought the first film was very good. However, I've just seen the second one and it was rubbish. The entire story has been changed from the book, for the worse, so I don't know why they've even called it the Edge of Reason. All the subtletly has been taken away and they've ended up with a cheesey, try to appeal to the lowest common denominator film which I think I only laughed in twice. Colin Firth and Renee Zellwegger played their parts very well, such a shame they had such a bad script to work with. True Bridget fans beware!!
I laughed once throughout the whole of this film. It's thoroughly predictable and incredibly boring. I would not recommend it.
Saw the first one and even my husband agreed it was funny (not a big fan of 'womens films!' This one was just awful. Painfully unfunny and I though Renee Zellweger was pretty bad too - a lot of simpering and cutsey face pulling does not make a film funny - and neither does adopting a silly walk. The only time we laughed out loud was in the fight scene, which was basically a re-enactment of the first film. A lot of references to shagging and the liberal use of f*** was just plain embarrassing and unneccessary.
Was hard to get beyond the first 20 minutes. Its like a chewing gum stretched and not sweet any more
DO NOT WATCH....instead see the part one again
We rarely bother with the cinema these days as most films look rather better on DVD if you have a decent enough TV. However, my wife was very keen to seen 'Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason.' I erred on the side of caution on the basis that most films where Richard Curtis has been involved in the scripting seem better on second or subsequent viewings and the majority of reviews had been more than downbeat, some suggesting it appeared to be more of a shoddy remake than a genuine sequel. My wife won and off we went.
Whilst the film is by no means a classic, ones familiarity with the characters works well and generally I found it to be gently amusing with a seamless transition between this and its slightly superior predecessor. The storyline would not survive close scrutiny but the scenery in Switzerland and Thailand adds an extra dimension.
The three leads perform in an entirely predictable but not unenjoyable manner and the two films will make for an agreeable double bill on DVD next year.
It's simply not true that Bridget's up her own bottom, not while there's an electric toothbrush with fully functioning batteries anyway... So enough of the Jack Russel jokes, he was the man who dared her to do a Meg Ryan, or anything that looked like real life, or even film life, lets face it, any life. Does she get into Jane Austin or someone who may sound a bit like a virginal vicar's daughter, or was that someone else... Who cares, the first film had cardboard characters, in this one they are as firm as Clark Gable's erection when holding Doris Day. Perhaps it's a girls thing...
No. its not funny than its predecessor.
But that doesnt mean that its awful. ok. you can have a few laughs and comfortably forget the film before you send the DVD back.
This film was obviously made on the cheap. A poor attempt at trying to be funny, bad acting, boring script and about 90 minutes to long.
I enjoyed the music and the ending when the credits appeared.
Give up BJ it's just not funny.
Its an ok film, but not as good as the first one.
Could not believe my eyes! I wasn't expecting much either but settled down to watch it with my mum and I can honestly say it was one of the worst films I have ever seen, up there with Existenz. T
he acting is that of the school play variety, the plot weak and absurd, shallow, awful, awful. Not even for a girlie night in.
The reasoning behind this sequel is obvious after the huge success of 2001's Bridget Jones's Diary, and the makers aren't taking any risks by deviating from the winning formula. Viewers might even suspect the projectionist of screening the first film by mistake, for the sequel again opens with gormless but lovable Bridget (Renée Zellweger) arriving for a Christmas family reunion. Except now she is no longer single, having hooked the dishy but taciturn lawyer Mark Darcy (Colin Firth). It's not long, however, before they're squabbling over such personal foibles as Mark's habit of folding his boxer shorts before going to bed, so Bridget heads off to Thailand to compile a travel programme with handsome cad Daniel Cleaver (Hugh Grant). The characterisations are once more excellent, so it's unfortunate that the scriptwriters (including Richard Curtis and the book's author, Helen Fielding) felt it necessary to revisit jokes from the original, and even expect laughs every time a character falls over or gets wet. Bridget Jones — as a character and first film — maintained a fine balance between the amusing and the tiresome. The sequel tilts this balance too far at times but, if you can ignore the many similarities, you may still laugh your socks off.
The mixture is much as before in this sequel, but unfortunately, it does not benefit from repetition; it's bright and cheerful, though.
Ill admit it: I never caught the first Bridget Jones movie and so cant fully compare this sequel to the... read more on Time Out
I confidently predict this will be the biggest British film of all time.
Brilliant sequel ... even better than the 2001 original.