Title Runtime Certificate
Chernobyl Diaries
1hr 24 mins 15

LOVEFiLM Instant Information

Run time: 1 hour 24 minutes
Rental release: To be confirmed
Write your own review

Most helpful review Chernobyl Diaries

  • Eerie setting, shame about everything else

    Rated - 1.0 star  
    By BlaiseT (13 reviews) from Nottingham , 25 Jun 2012

    [Highly rated reviewer]

    Chernobyl Diaries is about a group of young, attractive and mostly American tourists who travel through an Eastern European country with predictable results. They have an enjoyable and life-enriching experience and return home with many great memories of their time spent in Ukraine? No, silly, this is the world of bad horror films, where unkempt, wild-eyed Europeans have made a national sport out of murdering hapless American tourists. You know what happens next.

    There's one way in which Chernobyl Diaries distinguishes itself, and that's in the haunting setting of real ghost town Pripyat, a town abandoned during the Chernobyl disaster and left to fall into eerie decay over the years. It's a fantastic setting for a horror film, and the first half does look good and have some genuinely atmospheric moments as our tourists embark on a guided tour of the town with their predictably shifty Ukranian guide Uri.

    Then the van is sabotaged and they're forced to spend the night in Pripyat being hunted down by wild dogs and menacing blurry figures. It's difficult to really care if anyone survives as the dull cast make a series of stupid decisions that enable them to run shrieking from one location to the next while the camera jitters madly about them and they're occasionally seized by more menacing blurs and dragged off to a shrieky and unseen death. Sometimes they stop shrieking long enough to declare something profound along the lines of 'We've got to get the f*** out of here/This is not f***** happening/Not without my brother', etc. I saw this film the day after I made a long-haul flight with a severe cold which left me mostly deaf in one ear, and I suspect I'd have enjoyed Chernobyl Diaries more if I'd lost hearing in the other ear too. The dialogue really is that poor and cliched.

    As for our blurry antagonists, they're never really seen much. On one hand, this feels cheap and lazy, on the other, given that they're supposedly the mutated survivors of a very real and recent tragedy, perhaps it's for the best. Don't expect any surprise twists or revelations that justify the use of Chernobyl victims or gives them any real depth or motivation. They're movie monsters, mercilessly chasing down pretty young tourists because that's what monsters do. Chernobyl Diaries is essentially a zombie film with fast, agile 'zombies', somewhat like 28 Days Later except terrible in almost every way.

    Poor taste aside, it also fails as an effective horror film. The most alarming moment comes courtesy of a radioactive bear shambling unexpectedly into the screen, akin to the 'cat jumping out of the closet' moment more usually seen in horror films, but truthfully, Chernobyl Diaries would have probably been a better film if it just stuck with the radioactive bears as its primary antagonist. Better yet, make them the protagonists bravely defending their home against waves of nosy, generic and thoroughly unlikeable tourists. It would have been a much better movie.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (58) Yes |
    •  No (16)

All reviews

(187)
  • Better than I expected

    Rated - 3.5 stars  
    By DoctorWho (112 reviews) from Epping , 21 May 2013
    I wasn't expecting much from this film, but was pleasantly surprised. It was nicely shot, capturing the look of Pripyat very well. The acting was of a fairly decent standard. It is basically a rather daft story, but I can forgive it that for its location and suspense.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • As is so often the way...

    Rated - 2.5 stars  
    By SiSlayRD500 (132 reviews) from Solihull , 14 May 2013
    This for me and as is so often the way, could have been SO much more. It started out okay and for a short time looked like it was going to be potentially good, but unfortunately that was short lived! It is reasonably filmed, has a few slightly jumpy albeit Inevitable moments and at times almost has some atmosphere... but then and in short, that's it really. JUST OK for A watch, but that's about it.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • Utter Tosh!

    Rated - 0.5 stars  
    By Myeyesarebleeding (1 review) , 12 May 2013

    THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS Show review anywayHide

    Words escape me just how bad this film is.

    There really isn't much else to say!

    So I'll leave it at that.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • film c

    Rated - 3.0 stars  
    By a customer , 11 May 2013
    looks a good film with a good review, although i don't paticually want to watch it! i would say watch it if you like that kind of film!
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (6)
  • Worth watching no blockbuster.

    Rated - 2.5 stars  
    By Ash75 (1 review) , 10 May 2013
    Not bad, leaves you wanting to know more about the disaster, but that's the films only impact. Cast were not to bad, the story was nearly plausible, combined the film was watchable but it's no blockbuster.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
 

Agree or disagree? Write your own review

Please sign in to LOVEFiLM to write your review

Sign in to LOVEFiLM

Not a member yet?

Sign up to start your 30-day FREE trial