loading loading...

Elizabeth - The Golden Age Reviews

2007 Certificate 12
  • Rated:
  • 70
  • from 37,511 members

The sequel to 1998's Elizabeth. This film follows the monarch's middle years on the throne, highlighting the conflict between her personal and public life, and the continuing threats to her reign at home and abroad. Read more

Starring Cate Blanchett, Clive Owen, Geoffrey Rush, Jordi Molla
Director Shekhar Kapur
Genres Drama

loading loading...

  • Critics' reviews of Elizabeth - The Golden Age

    View all
  • 2 stars out of

    Theres a scene in Elizabeth: The Golden Age that shows the forces of Spain preparing for the invasion of... read more on Time Out

    • Ben Walters, 
    • Time Out
  • Most helpful members' reviews (3) of Elizabeth - The Golden Age

    View all
  • 45 out of 49 people found this review helpful

    * * * This review contains spoilers * * *ShowHide

    Rated - 4 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    Majestic sequel

    • Meako
      • Meako from Sheffield
  • 21 out of 23 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Painfully long & slow

    What can I say, the 1st Elizabeth was simply great, the kind of movie leaving you riveted to the edge of your seat!

    Unfortunately this one is very much the complete opposite. So yes the costumes are great and the few CGI special effects (basically the couple of minutes of action featuring the ships of the spanish Great Armada) are well made.

    But apart from that it's a 2 hours torture that could have easily been reduced to a half-hour. There's no rhythm, it's very very slow, with many supposedly 'key' scenes just dragging on & on & on (e.g. the execution, the baby, the kiss, etc etc...). The trailer pretty much shows what's worth watching out of the 2 hours movie, how sad is that?

    Kate Blanchett's acting is possibly the only positive note overall & Clive Owen is pathetic as usual (though his worst performance is still Children of Men). As for Geoffrey Rush I really like him but he doesn't have much to do in this movie.

    In the end, you feel the director made an attempt to depict some kind of intimate portrayal of Elizabeth: her fears, her doubts, her loneliness... Fine, but then stick to making some BBC TV documentary. Because for a full-length cinema feature it's definitely not good enough! Kapur should have stuck to the winning formula that worked so well for the 1st movie: the intrigues, the twisted plots, the action...

    Sorry, just didn't do it for me.

      • A customer from London
  • 18 out of 18 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 3 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    The Golden Age

    1585. Elizabeth (Blanchett) has been Queen of England for nearly 30 years but there remain threats to her throne, mostly from King Philip of Spain (Molla) who is raising a fleet to attack England and remove its 'heretical' Queen. From within there is a threat in the guise of a plot involving Elizabeth's cousin Mary Stuart (Morton) and at court there is intrigue as explorer Walter Raleigh (Owen) returns from the new world and makes a big impression on both the Queen and Bess Throckmorton, her favourite lady-in-waiting (Cornish).

    The original Elizabeth set a relatively high watermark for this sequel to meet but with most of the talent returning and some quality new recruits it shouldn't have been tough, there's even room for improvement on the first film. The Golden Age, sadly, is a decidedly less interesting film than its predecessor.

    Much of the problem is structural. While Elizabeth had a traditional thriller structure, focused tightly in on a single plot, The Golden Age tries to do too much. The Mary Queen of Scots plot fills time before the Spanish Armada is ready, but little is achieved by its inclusion, mainly because Samantha Morton's Mary has barely 10 minutes of screen time and so her motives are unknowable and it's hard to connect. The Walter Raleigh story is dull and neither the relationship between Owen and Blanchett, nor that between Owen and Cornish generate much heat, it also leads to the film's nadir, in which Elizabeth throws what can only be described as a hissy fit on finding out that Raleigh and Bess are involved. The Armada arrives late in the game and the battle, which surely should have been the centrepiece of the last act of the film, is dealt with in very short order and little sense of the importance of the victory.

    The cast are a distinctly mixed bag. Geoffrey Rush returns from the first film as Walsingham and while he's excellent his role is much less interesting and not so dark this time out. It's also hard to figure out why Walsingham is in the film, there's little he does here that has any great effect on events. Clive Owen gives his usual performance as Raleigh, which is to say that he seems just to have woken up to deliver his lines in an emotionless monotone (with, this time, a globetrotting accent which goes from England, to Ireland to America and back several times a sentence). This hurts the film massively because it's hard to see how this man captures the attention of Elizabeth or Bess. As Bess Abbie Cornish is defeated by her monumentally terrible British accent, which she seems to abandon midway through takes for her native Aussie sound. It sticks out like a sore thumb and makes whatever other work she does go unnoticed. There are good performances from Samantha Morton and from Rhys Ifans (essentially taking over Daniel Craig's role from the first film) but neither gets enough screen time to make a great impression. There is, however, a nice line in malevolence from Jordi Molla as Philip of Spain.

    Once again Cate Blanchett towers over the movie , indeed this time out she single-handedly lifts it above mundanity. Right from the first time I saw the trailer I knew Blanchett would be electrifying, if only from the exchange between the Spanish ambassdor and Elizabeth wherein he threatens “There is a wind coming that will sweep away your pride” only to have Elizabeth bellow back “I too can command the winds Sir, I have a hurricane in me that will strip Spain bare if you dare toy try me”. It's a great line, one of the best of the year and brilliantly delivered in a moment to make the hairs on the back of your neck stand to attention. In another dead on performance only the aforementioned hissy fit comes off badly, but that's hardly Blanchett's fault as she's fighting there against some truly abysmal writing.

    If there is a larger problem with Blanchett's turn as Elizabeth it is that at the time the film is set the monarch was 52 years old while the radiantly beautiful 37 year old Blanchett looks a good 2 decades more youthful.

    On the plus side Shekhar Kapur still exhibits a fantastic visual sense and knows how to find shots and moments that will stay in the memory (a silhouetted Philip inspecting his fleet being built, Elizabeth alone in her chambers in full armour) and he's stopped leaning so heavily on his ceiling shots. It's a gorgeous film, one that will probably attract a deserved nomination for cinematography at next years Oscars. Kapur does, however, still use his soundtrack as a crutch, this is particularly irritating during the montage surrounding Mary Queen of Scots execution; I'd much rather have heard what she said to the executioner than the blaring music.

    When The Golden Age works it is stunning but because of a rambling, unfocused screenplay and several poor performances it works only sporadically and it is left to the ever amazing Cate Blanchett to hold things together.

      • SAI81 from Tonbridge
  • Most recent members' reviews (2) of Elizabeth - The Golden Age

    View all
  • 3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

    * * * This review contains spoilers * * *ShowHide

    Rated - 4 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    Quite stunning really

    • DirtyHarry
      • DirtyHarry from HARROGATE
  • 2 out of 2 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 3 stars

    Disappointing follow-up

    As sequels go I've seen worse but this just lacks something that the first film had. Cate Blanchett is as good as ever, and the supporting cast is excellent, but fans of Elizabeth may well feel a bit let down

      • mfdoc from Swansea
  • 45 out of 49 people found this review helpful

    * * * This review contains spoilers * * *ShowHide

    Rated - 4 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    Majestic sequel

    • Meako
      • Meako from Sheffield
  • 21 out of 23 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Painfully long & slow

    What can I say, the 1st Elizabeth was simply great, the kind of movie leaving you riveted to the edge of your seat!

    Unfortunately this one is very much the complete opposite. So yes the costumes are great and the few CGI special effects (basically the couple of minutes of action featuring the ships of the spanish Great Armada) are well made.

    But apart from that it's a 2 hours torture that could have easily been reduced to a half-hour. There's no rhythm, it's very very slow, with many supposedly 'key' scenes just dragging on & on & on (e.g. the execution, the baby, the kiss, etc etc...). The trailer pretty much shows what's worth watching out of the 2 hours movie, how sad is that?

    Kate Blanchett's acting is possibly the only positive note overall & Clive Owen is pathetic as usual (though his worst performance is still Children of Men). As for Geoffrey Rush I really like him but he doesn't have much to do in this movie.

    In the end, you feel the director made an attempt to depict some kind of intimate portrayal of Elizabeth: her fears, her doubts, her loneliness... Fine, but then stick to making some BBC TV documentary. Because for a full-length cinema feature it's definitely not good enough! Kapur should have stuck to the winning formula that worked so well for the 1st movie: the intrigues, the twisted plots, the action...

    Sorry, just didn't do it for me.

      • A customer from London
  • 18 out of 18 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 3 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    The Golden Age

    1585. Elizabeth (Blanchett) has been Queen of England for nearly 30 years but there remain threats to her throne, mostly from King Philip of Spain (Molla) who is raising a fleet to attack England and remove its 'heretical' Queen. From within there is a threat in the guise of a plot involving Elizabeth's cousin Mary Stuart (Morton) and at court there is intrigue as explorer Walter Raleigh (Owen) returns from the new world and makes a big impression on both the Queen and Bess Throckmorton, her favourite lady-in-waiting (Cornish).

    The original Elizabeth set a relatively high watermark for this sequel to meet but with most of the talent returning and some quality new recruits it shouldn't have been tough, there's even room for improvement on the first film. The Golden Age, sadly, is a decidedly less interesting film than its predecessor.

    Much of the problem is structural. While Elizabeth had a traditional thriller structure, focused tightly in on a single plot, The Golden Age tries to do too much. The Mary Queen of Scots plot fills time before the Spanish Armada is ready, but little is achieved by its inclusion, mainly because Samantha Morton's Mary has barely 10 minutes of screen time and so her motives are unknowable and it's hard to connect. The Walter Raleigh story is dull and neither the relationship between Owen and Blanchett, nor that between Owen and Cornish generate much heat, it also leads to the film's nadir, in which Elizabeth throws what can only be described as a hissy fit on finding out that Raleigh and Bess are involved. The Armada arrives late in the game and the battle, which surely should have been the centrepiece of the last act of the film, is dealt with in very short order and little sense of the importance of the victory.

    The cast are a distinctly mixed bag. Geoffrey Rush returns from the first film as Walsingham and while he's excellent his role is much less interesting and not so dark this time out. It's also hard to figure out why Walsingham is in the film, there's little he does here that has any great effect on events. Clive Owen gives his usual performance as Raleigh, which is to say that he seems just to have woken up to deliver his lines in an emotionless monotone (with, this time, a globetrotting accent which goes from England, to Ireland to America and back several times a sentence). This hurts the film massively because it's hard to see how this man captures the attention of Elizabeth or Bess. As Bess Abbie Cornish is defeated by her monumentally terrible British accent, which she seems to abandon midway through takes for her native Aussie sound. It sticks out like a sore thumb and makes whatever other work she does go unnoticed. There are good performances from Samantha Morton and from Rhys Ifans (essentially taking over Daniel Craig's role from the first film) but neither gets enough screen time to make a great impression. There is, however, a nice line in malevolence from Jordi Molla as Philip of Spain.

    Once again Cate Blanchett towers over the movie , indeed this time out she single-handedly lifts it above mundanity. Right from the first time I saw the trailer I knew Blanchett would be electrifying, if only from the exchange between the Spanish ambassdor and Elizabeth wherein he threatens “There is a wind coming that will sweep away your pride” only to have Elizabeth bellow back “I too can command the winds Sir, I have a hurricane in me that will strip Spain bare if you dare toy try me”. It's a great line, one of the best of the year and brilliantly delivered in a moment to make the hairs on the back of your neck stand to attention. In another dead on performance only the aforementioned hissy fit comes off badly, but that's hardly Blanchett's fault as she's fighting there against some truly abysmal writing.

    If there is a larger problem with Blanchett's turn as Elizabeth it is that at the time the film is set the monarch was 52 years old while the radiantly beautiful 37 year old Blanchett looks a good 2 decades more youthful.

    On the plus side Shekhar Kapur still exhibits a fantastic visual sense and knows how to find shots and moments that will stay in the memory (a silhouetted Philip inspecting his fleet being built, Elizabeth alone in her chambers in full armour) and he's stopped leaning so heavily on his ceiling shots. It's a gorgeous film, one that will probably attract a deserved nomination for cinematography at next years Oscars. Kapur does, however, still use his soundtrack as a crutch, this is particularly irritating during the montage surrounding Mary Queen of Scots execution; I'd much rather have heard what she said to the executioner than the blaring music.

    When The Golden Age works it is stunning but because of a rambling, unfocused screenplay and several poor performances it works only sporadically and it is left to the ever amazing Cate Blanchett to hold things together.

      • SAI81 from Tonbridge
  • 11 out of 11 people found this review helpful

    * * * This review contains spoilers * * *ShowHide

    Rated - 5 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    Stunningly superb period piece...

  • 8 out of 8 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    awful, awful, awful....

    I adored 'Elizabeth' and couldn't wait to see this but oh, what a disapointment. Dull script and even duller acting. Clive Owen is awfull, but then so are most of the cast (even Cate struggles). Do not waste your time on this because, believe me, any minute spent watching this is a minute wasted. Awful. awful, awful...........

      • Accy from Halifax
  • 8 out of 10 people found this review helpful

    * * * This review contains spoilers * * *ShowHide

    Rated - 0 stars

    A truly terrible film.

      • A customer from Darlington
  • 6 out of 6 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star [Highly rated reviewer]

    An early Christmas turkey.

    I have just got back from watching this at the cinema and all I can say is 'what a disappointment'.

    I loved 'Elizabeth', but this film is an real mess. Elizabeth is reduced to little more than a menopausal woman (though ageing remarkably well, considering she is supposed to be in her early fifties) with the hots for Walter Raleigh.

    There is a plotline involving an attempted assassination of Elizabeth, and it being a duplicitous plan to give the Spaniards the excuse for invading, which just gets completely lost.

    There is no sense of suspense, excitement or even credibility at any moment. The defeat of the Armada gets reduced to a few fire ships (heroically steered by Sir Walter Raleigh on his own) breaking up the entire Armada. One knows the Armada has been defeated when a candle the King of Spain is holding, signifying the light of Catholicism coming to the dark shores of Protestant England, is blown out by a gust of wind. Elizabeth then appears to be standing on a pedestal, being rotated whilst lit by countless halogen bulbs, radiating as the light of England.

    Absolute tripe!

      • 4Tell
  • 4 out of 4 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 2 stars

    A Glorious Mess

    Where the first Elizabeth was full of suspense and intrigue this second installment is just a silly melodrama - and without very much drama.

    For the first hour my attention was held by how lush the film looks and the costumes are stunning. However when, for the fifth time, the camera has circled the queen wearing another spectacular dress while the music soars in an attempt to tell the audience that something dramatic is happening you suddenly realise that the narrative has been replaced by an Elizabethan fashion show! The whole film is pure pantomime from Clive Owen's Mills and Boon swashbuckler to the King of Spain appearing more like Gollum than a credible historical character. And there in the midst of it is poor Kate Blanchet desperately trying to persuade us to take this rubbish seriously!

    Dull, dull, dull, dull, dull.......

      • A customer from Birmingham
  • 4 out of 4 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 5 stars

    Gripping Stuff

    Excellent film, great acting, highly recommended

      • A customer from Birmingham
  • 4 out of 5 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Absurd

    Very silly plot, which is historically inaccurate in the extreme. Poor acting - lots of posturing. Very repetitive direction. None of the atmosphere of the earlier film to redeem it.

    Nice costumes though!

      • A customer from London
  • Critics' reviews

  • 2 stars out of

    Theres a scene in Elizabeth: The Golden Age that shows the forces of Spain preparing for the invasion of... read more on Time Out

    • Ben Walters, 
    • Time Out

Find cinemas


Buy from the LOVEFiLM shop


    • Elizabeth - The Golden Age - HD DVD Version
      The sequel to 1998's Elizabeth. This film follows the monarch's middle years on the throne, highlighting the conflict between her personal and public life, and the continuing threats to her reign at home and abroad....

    • Elizabeth - The Golden Age - BLU-RAY Version
      Nearly a decade after Cate Blanchett drew the attention of audiences and critics alike with ELIZABETH, the Oscar-winning actress returns to the role of the Virgin Queen. Though the protestant ruler has been on the throne for decades in 1585, Elizabeth I's reign is still under attack from both ...

    • Elizabeth - The Golden Age
      The sequel to 1998's Elizabeth. This film follows the monarch's middle years on the throne, highlighting the conflict between her personal and public life, and the continuing threats to her reign at home and abroad....

Rating breakdown

37,511 Member ratings
  • 100
2,955
  • 90
1,757
  • 80
9,399
  • 70
8,328
  • 60
8,536
  • 50
2,873
  • 40
2,285
  • 30
584
  • 20
594
  • 10
200

Celebrity collection

Channing Tatum (4)
Average rating: 5.00   100% from 1 member