Cassavetes follows the complicated lives of a group of middle class people living in LA and contains some startlingly raw performances from actors Lynn Carlin and John Marley as married couple Maria and Richard who both commit adultery to escape the misery of their loveless marriage. Richard begins an affair with high-class .. Read more
| Starring | John Marley, Gena Rowlands, Lynn Carlin, Seymour Cassel |
|---|---|
| Director | John Cassavetes |
| Genres | Drama |
loading...
This challenging, gritty example of 1960s New American cinema from John Cassavetes combines Method acting with the cinematic techniques of the French New Wave. The marriage of Californian liberals John Marley and Lynn Carlin is on the rocks and after yet another row he storms out to spend the night with prostitute Gena Rowlands, while she finds solace in the arms of disco-dancing hippy Seymour Cassel. The picture originally lasted six hours and there are still places where some judicious cutting would not go amiss. But the improvised performances are exceptional, with Marley and Rowlands every bit as impressive as the Oscar-nominated Carlin and Cassel. Cassavetes's screenplay also received a nomination.
Cassavetes' first independent film since Shadows - made after the severely compromised, if fascinating, studio movies... read more on Time Out
There is a school of thought that believes that depicting a group of drunken self-indulgent slobs jumping about and making a lot of noise can be made into worthwhile cinema provided it is in black and white, with a hand-held camera, inaudible repetitive dialogue and inconsequential plot development. Although I am no fan of the brain-dead vacuity of Hollywood, this type of film is hardly an interesting alternative. Pretentious nonsense from start to middle (of course I didn't finish it ....)
'Faces' is one of the first American films to reach to the core of people's relationships. It provides wonderful insight into a lifestyle that is distinctly American. The detached way that the characters interact most of the time is only a logical conclusion of the commerce-driven world we live in. The film is personal in a way that many European films of the 1950's and 1960's were. Even the title suggests the intimacy of the film and its treatment of its characters.
Cassavettes must have been repulsed by the insincerity of the people who were surrounding him when he wrote 'Faces'. Few films have so many moments where characters are together but not talking to each other. They are merely talking, or laughing, or singing, doing anything they can to avoid having to confront the other person. Only once, when the young lover boy talks about the mechanical nature of people in America, do we even get any hint that the filmmaker is put off by the behaviour of his characters. The rest of the time he merely films them and shows us what they do. This unsentimental approach can leave the viewer feeling a bit odd, but it works very well in the end. By seeing these character's shortcomings without any hint of disapproval from the filmmaker, the viewer is forced to consider their own lives and the people around them. It allows for an honesty not found in any, I repeat any other American film of the 1960's. Even 'Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf' has some indications of Nichols' attitude towards the material. 'Faces' is just the facts.
I can only imagine the excitement that people interested in film must have felt upon the release of this film. Here was a personal, Bergman-esque film made about American people living American lives. The quiet desperation of the housewife, the empty feeling inside the businessman, the false nature of each and every relationship speak volumes about the reality of American family life. How refreshing it must have been to see these topics approached in an American film.
The film's style is notable as well. It is independent in every sense of the word. It uses a fluid camera, freeform acting, and natural lighting. In many ways, it paved the way for a lot of the young filmmakers of the 1970's by providing them with a stylistic freedom that Hollywood had previously ignored. Today, it appears as a fairly standard film in terms of style, but at the time it was groundbreaking and exciting. In fact, it retains that excitement today, although the real revelation is how much has been taken from the film and used by others.
'Faces' is a great movie experience. Anyone frustrated with the lack of real connection in their lives should see it, if only to realize that many others are suffering from the same fate.
A truly genuine and immersive slice of experimental cinema. I don't remember ever witnessing performances that feel so real.
The first 30 minutes are quite taxing, for two reasons. First, the three characters are drunk and noisy, and find themselves amusing in a way that most viewers will probably not. Second, the sound quality throughout is appalling - I haven't seen the original film so I am prepared to believe it was not the director's choice. After that it seems to get a bit more bearable. But I wouldn't watch it again.
Please don't bother with this one it is dreadful
Nuff Said!
There is a school of thought that believes that depicting a group of drunken self-indulgent slobs jumping about and making a lot of noise can be made into worthwhile cinema provided it is in black and white, with a hand-held camera, inaudible repetitive dialogue and inconsequential plot development. Although I am no fan of the brain-dead vacuity of Hollywood, this type of film is hardly an interesting alternative. Pretentious nonsense from start to middle (of course I didn't finish it ....)
'Faces' is one of the first American films to reach to the core of people's relationships. It provides wonderful insight into a lifestyle that is distinctly American. The detached way that the characters interact most of the time is only a logical conclusion of the commerce-driven world we live in. The film is personal in a way that many European films of the 1950's and 1960's were. Even the title suggests the intimacy of the film and its treatment of its characters.
Cassavettes must have been repulsed by the insincerity of the people who were surrounding him when he wrote 'Faces'. Few films have so many moments where characters are together but not talking to each other. They are merely talking, or laughing, or singing, doing anything they can to avoid having to confront the other person. Only once, when the young lover boy talks about the mechanical nature of people in America, do we even get any hint that the filmmaker is put off by the behaviour of his characters. The rest of the time he merely films them and shows us what they do. This unsentimental approach can leave the viewer feeling a bit odd, but it works very well in the end. By seeing these character's shortcomings without any hint of disapproval from the filmmaker, the viewer is forced to consider their own lives and the people around them. It allows for an honesty not found in any, I repeat any other American film of the 1960's. Even 'Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf' has some indications of Nichols' attitude towards the material. 'Faces' is just the facts.
I can only imagine the excitement that people interested in film must have felt upon the release of this film. Here was a personal, Bergman-esque film made about American people living American lives. The quiet desperation of the housewife, the empty feeling inside the businessman, the false nature of each and every relationship speak volumes about the reality of American family life. How refreshing it must have been to see these topics approached in an American film.
The film's style is notable as well. It is independent in every sense of the word. It uses a fluid camera, freeform acting, and natural lighting. In many ways, it paved the way for a lot of the young filmmakers of the 1970's by providing them with a stylistic freedom that Hollywood had previously ignored. Today, it appears as a fairly standard film in terms of style, but at the time it was groundbreaking and exciting. In fact, it retains that excitement today, although the real revelation is how much has been taken from the film and used by others.
'Faces' is a great movie experience. Anyone frustrated with the lack of real connection in their lives should see it, if only to realize that many others are suffering from the same fate.
A truly genuine and immersive slice of experimental cinema. I don't remember ever witnessing performances that feel so real.
The first 30 minutes are quite taxing, for two reasons. First, the three characters are drunk and noisy, and find themselves amusing in a way that most viewers will probably not. Second, the sound quality throughout is appalling - I haven't seen the original film so I am prepared to believe it was not the director's choice. After that it seems to get a bit more bearable. But I wouldn't watch it again.
Please don't bother with this one it is dreadful
Nuff Said!
This challenging, gritty example of 1960s New American cinema from John Cassavetes combines Method acting with the cinematic techniques of the French New Wave. The marriage of Californian liberals John Marley and Lynn Carlin is on the rocks and after yet another row he storms out to spend the night with prostitute Gena Rowlands, while she finds solace in the arms of disco-dancing hippy Seymour Cassel. The picture originally lasted six hours and there are still places where some judicious cutting would not go amiss. But the improvised performances are exceptional, with Marley and Rowlands every bit as impressive as the Oscar-nominated Carlin and Cassel. Cassavetes's screenplay also received a nomination.
Cassavetes' first independent film since Shadows - made after the severely compromised, if fascinating, studio movies... read more on Time Out