Full Frontal cover art

Full Frontal Reviews

2002 Certificate 18
  • Rated:
  • 40
  • from 2502 members

It's a chaotic day for seven strangers from Hollywood who end up at the birthday party of a mutual friend. Before the night is over, relationships are tested, hearts are broken and passions are renewed! Read more

Starring David Duchovny, Nicky Katt, Catherine Keener, Mary McCormack
Director Steven Soderbergh
Genres Comedy

loading loading...

  • Critics' reviews (3) of Full Frontal

    View all
  • 1 stars out of 5

    Life as art appears to be the driving principle behind this self-indulgent celebration of Hollywood egos. Built on Dogme 95-style foundations — with actors doing their own hair and make-up and relinquishing their traditional on-set privileges — director Steven Soderbergh's apparent attempt to get back to his grittier roots isn't nearly as clever as he thinks it is. The basic scenario is a day in the life of LA's beautiful people; those featured are potential guests at the 40th birthday bash of movie producer Gus (David Duchovny). Taking advantage of his current hot status, Soderbergh has assembled a glittering cast of friends — including Julia Roberts and Catherine Keener — who ramble their way through a plethora of human emotions, captured on grainy digital video for that extra touch of pretension. Ultimately, everyone involved seems to think they're doing something so profound that they've forgotten to be entertaining — or even interesting.

    • Radio Times
  • Shot mainly on digital video, this is a low-budget jeu d'esprit done as an experiment or relaxation; it should have stayed as a home movie.

    • Halliwell's Film Guide
  • It had to happen: Soderbergh's gotten carried away with himself. Returning to the free-film terrain of Schizopolis, but... read more on Time Out

    • Time Out
  • Most helpful members' reviews (3) of Full Frontal

    View all
  • 30 out of 30 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    This is the worst film I have ever seen - serves me right for ignoring the other reviews! A tedious mix of documentary style filming and film within a film with confusing characters and just . . . truly, truly awful. Not even good actors could save this rubbish. Hollywood at its worst - save yourself from getting bored and rent something else.

      • Fi#2 from SANDY
  • 17 out of 17 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    Stopped watching it after 10 mins, then went back and read the reviews for the first time. Ah ha! I should have read them before we rented it!

      • lmcpy#1 from BALLACHULISH
  • 16 out of 16 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    So bad, I just don't have the words.

    Video your genitals, it would be more fun to watch.

      • ian#14 from EPSOM
  • Most recent members' reviews (2) of Full Frontal

    View all
  • 1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Well, what can I say. With the documentary style cinematography, the whole experience left me somewhat disappointed. Technically had all the right input to become a great film but missed it by a mile or two. Would be useful to watch in a media study excercise to compare with other films but as a stand alone piece of entertainment, it's hard work.

      • Vicx#1 from KINGSTANDING
  • 1 out of 1 person found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Soderbergh, but not as we know him!

    The emphasis on 'improvisation' and 'low-budget' that did so well for Soderbergh with his debut 'Sex, Lies and Videotape' seems to have done the director no favours here. The star-studded cast is let loose to improvise on how shallow and depressing Hollywood lives are - this is self-indulgent 'art cinema' at its worst. Not worth anyone's time or patience.

      • Cass from Scotland
  • 30 out of 30 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    This is the worst film I have ever seen - serves me right for ignoring the other reviews! A tedious mix of documentary style filming and film within a film with confusing characters and just . . . truly, truly awful. Not even good actors could save this rubbish. Hollywood at its worst - save yourself from getting bored and rent something else.

      • Fi#2 from SANDY
  • 17 out of 17 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    Stopped watching it after 10 mins, then went back and read the reviews for the first time. Ah ha! I should have read them before we rented it!

      • lmcpy#1 from BALLACHULISH
  • 16 out of 16 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    So bad, I just don't have the words.

    Video your genitals, it would be more fun to watch.

      • ian#14 from EPSOM
  • 9 out of 15 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    David Soderbergh fans BEWARE!!!! This is no "Traffic" or "Ocean's Eleven" - it ain't even an "Erin Brokovich". This unfortunately is one of those films that good directors seem to find the need to make. They call it experimental, I call it "what were you thinking!?"!!! If you go by the cast, the cool current Hollywood bunch - friends and compadres of Dave, then you could expect something good. It ain't! Don't ask me what it's about! I ain't got the slightest clue! Rent the above mentioned films if you want some great Soderbergh experience. Rent "Full Frontal" if you wanna watch a homemovie a la Soderbergh!

      • JenKFilmBuffette#1 from LONDON
  • 5 out of 6 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    The world's worst movie ever?

    Most of the film takes place in one day and consists of a series of disjointed phrases in various people's lives, some of whom are in serious need of psychiatric help. There is little or no interaction between most of the characters. What is the point of a profile shot of a lady driving home in her car if there is no context? Some way into the movie the viewer is forgiven for thinking he is mistakenly watching a compilation of out-takes. One's feeling of being taken for a ride is heightened by a small minority of scenes with gratuitous extremely foul language which might be acceptable in a totally different context, but not here. It is not worthy of stars like Blair Underwood and Julia Roberts.

      • A customer from Kent, England
  • 4 out of 4 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    No, no, no, no

    David Soderbergh fans beware! This is no 'Traffic' or 'Ocean's Eleven' - it ain't even an 'Erin Brokovich'. This unfortunately is one of those films that good directors seem to find the need to make. They call it experimental, I call it 'what were you thinking'? If you go by the cast, the cool current Hollywood bunch - friends and compadres of Dave, then you could expect something good. It ain't! Don't ask me what it's about! I haven't got the slightest clue! Rent the above mentioned films if you want some great Soderbergh experience. Rent 'Full Frontal' if you wanna watch a homemovie a la Soderbergh! Bring on Ocean's 12.

      • Jen Movie Addict from London, UK
  • 3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 3 stars

    Interesting, but not great

    Shot for $2million and in 18 days Full Frontal is Steve Soderbergh getting back to basics after hitting the big time with Erin Brokovich and Traffic.

    This is a series of (grainy) digitally shot sequences, some of which have no meaning to the larger picture. It is both intriguing and boring at the same time. Nothing much happens, but once in a while something funny and interesting will occur (David Duchovny's massage comes right to mind).

    Keep an eye out for cameos from the likes of Terrence Stamp (aping a sequence from previous Soderbergh film The Limey), Brad Pitt (wearing the same outfit from the end of Se7en), David Fincher and Curb Your Enthusiasm regular Jeff Green as a spot on Harvey Weinstein.

    Fans of interweaving and meandering stories (Magnolia, Short Cuts, etc) should get their moneys worth here. Likewise those with a passing interest in the 'business'. And, I suppose if your clutching at straws for soemthing to like it's fun seeing all the star cameo's.

      • Scott Ramsay from Scotland
  • 3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    Indulgent drivel from people who should know better. It is insulting to realise that if you fill a film with A list stars, people will watch the result, no matter what it is about. I feel suitably mugged. Avoid this film like a rare skin disease.

      • Ditch#1 from EALING
  • 3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Switched it off half way through. Couldn't follow the plot, acting was stale. very shocked as Julia Roberts was in it and I love her films. I would not recommend this film to anyone.

      • A customer from HUDDERSFIELD
  • 3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 3 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    Interesting if not fascinating

    Slated by pretty much everyone, it's a a film about a film about a film, I think lol. Prententious and contrived is what's been levelled at this film and I can see why but I found this to be a very interesting film, if not great. Hired with a set of rules to adhere to, Soderbergh relies a great deal on the ability of the acting talent within the film to deliver story and dialogue from their characters with an emphasis on improvisation. With references to works from The Limey, Alien 3 and Steel Magnolias to name a few, it does go up its own booty a bit but I felt it did in an over-reaching way rather than a self-knowing way. The film focuses on the relationships between the main characters, specifically their emotional relationships but it's the film making and style itself that I enjoyed most about this. Shifting between stylised to hand held camera work I thought the film worked well like that and was there to help people to identify when it was the film within a film. A bit complex but I thought it was quite enjoyable.

      • McClennan from St Helens
  • Critics' reviews (3)

  • 1 stars out of 5

    Life as art appears to be the driving principle behind this self-indulgent celebration of Hollywood egos. Built on Dogme 95-style foundations — with actors doing their own hair and make-up and relinquishing their traditional on-set privileges — director Steven Soderbergh's apparent attempt to get back to his grittier roots isn't nearly as clever as he thinks it is. The basic scenario is a day in the life of LA's beautiful people; those featured are potential guests at the 40th birthday bash of movie producer Gus (David Duchovny). Taking advantage of his current hot status, Soderbergh has assembled a glittering cast of friends — including Julia Roberts and Catherine Keener — who ramble their way through a plethora of human emotions, captured on grainy digital video for that extra touch of pretension. Ultimately, everyone involved seems to think they're doing something so profound that they've forgotten to be entertaining — or even interesting.

    • Radio Times
  • Shot mainly on digital video, this is a low-budget jeu d'esprit done as an experiment or relaxation; it should have stayed as a home movie.

    • Halliwell's Film Guide
  • It had to happen: Soderbergh's gotten carried away with himself. Returning to the free-film terrain of Schizopolis, but... read more on Time Out

    • Time Out

Buy from the LOVEFiLM shop


    • Full Frontal
    • DVD: £3.93
      Free Delivery
    • RRP £15.79 (you save: 75%)
    • It's a chaotic day for seven strangers from Hollywood who end up at the birthday party of a mutual friend. Before the night is over, relationships are tested, hearts are broken and passions are ...

Rating breakdown

2,502 Member ratings
  • 100
42
  • 90
54
  • 80
85
  • 70
176
  • 60
279
  • 50
302
  • 40
360
  • 30
415
  • 20
522
  • 10
267

Celebrity collection

Steve Jones (10)
Average rating: 3.73   74.6% from 92 members