Funny Games cover art

Funny Games Reviews

1997 Certificate 18
  • Rated:
  • 70
  • from 4147 members

A powerfully graphic film (even though no violence is ever shown on the screen itself) about an Austrian family who goes on a country vacation and become the victims of two cold-blooded psychopaths who are out to torture them with their "funny games." Haneke's point, that fictional violence is as real as the real world's, is .. Read more

Starring Susanne Lothar, Ulrich Muhe, Frank Giering, Arno Frisch
Director Michael Haneke
Genres Horror, Thriller, World Cinema

loading loading...

  • Critics' reviews (4) of Funny Games

    View all
  • 3 stars out of 5

    This controversial, cautionary tale from Austrian director Michael Haneke is lauded in some circles for being an uncompromising study of on-screen violence and, in others, as the worst type of exploitation that panders to the same base instincts it purports to lay bare. It follows two young men who inveigle their way into the holiday home of a middle-class family and subject them to degrading torture and sickening humiliation. Haneke's deconstruction of matter-of-fact terror is radical and thought-provoking, but also too clever by half. Setting out to appal the senses with a catalogue of true horror, Haneke succeeds in his aim with a powerful “shockumentary“ that's hard to watch — deliberately. It's definitely not for the faint-hearted.

    • Radio Times
  • 3 stars out of 4

    A disturbing film, intended as a polemic against film-makers and audiences who enjoy gratuitous violence; the violence here is presented in a way to make it seem painful rather than thrilling.

    • Halliwell's Film Guide
  • Continuing the fascination with violence and its representation evident in his earlier films, Haneke's movie may be... read more on Time Out

    • Time Out
  • Most helpful members' reviews (3) of Funny Games

    View all
  • 69 out of 75 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star [Highly rated reviewer]

    Utter rubbish! Avoid!!

    This film has no redeeming qualities at all - I wouldn't want to waste any more of my life even trying to begin to explain how bad this film is - it was like watching a rusty nail descending through a jar of honey - totally pointless. I only gave it one star because there's no option to give no stars.

  • 26 out of 27 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 5 stars

    Anti-Hollywood at its finest

    As Haneke said : Some people leave before the end of my films and thats fine, they obviously didnt need it, its those who see it through that not only need it but will ultimately understand my work.

    I feel sorry for those in the former catagory, for Haneke offers so much more than the dreary, big budget, happily ever after Spielberg style that we have become bogged down with. This is the antithesis of the sickly, schmultzy Hollywood crap which we are becoming more and more tired of. This is quite simply a great film and my advice is simple. Watch it, its good to be shocked, thats how boundaries are pushed and Haneke is most certainly doing that (even if you agree with nothing else).

      • stuart lomas from Sunny Exmouth
  • 22 out of 28 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    What a waste of time

    WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP!!!!!!!. I'VE SEEN MORE FRIGHTENING SPIDERS!!!!!

      • A customer from UK
  • Most recent members' reviews (2) of Funny Games

    View all
  • 6 out of 6 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 4 stars

    A Sadistic Study In Violence

    You'll need a strong stomach and nerves of steel to withstand this chilling film, an ice-cold study in violence and voyeurism from Michael Haneke, director of "The Piano Teacher". A nice middle class couple and their young son drive to their country house for the weekend, and are attacked by two young intruders who subject them to a night of physical and psychological torment. Unusually, he refrains from showing violence onscreen, leaving us to infer the worst from shots of splattering blood or the victims' screams, and reminds us of our complicity in the action by having the torturers wink conspiratorially at the audience. The family are offered a means of escape only to have Haneke literally rewind proceedings and drag them back into the inferno. Haneke's desire to reawaken his audience to the horror of violence is commendable, but his direction has a sadistic rigour rivalling his fictional psychopaths.

      • Kiwiboy from London
  • 4 out of 4 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 5 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    Still Reeling!

    I feel a little ill even writing about this film 48 hours after seeing it. My heart murmurs, I sweat a little. This is a masterpiece, of that there is no doubt. And yet, there are few of my friends and certainly none of my family I would recommend it to. It refuses to leave my mind and I keep reconsidering this aspect or that and having new revelations.

    Essentially, the film is an incredibly clever essay in media violence, where minds as evil as the nazis meet the bourgeois and turn their instruments of safety and security against them. I tend to dislike reviewers describing things as essays or saying that a film is 'about' such-an-such. It suggests to me that they don't understand it and it is highly reductive. However, this film is an essay! Set up the premise; stage the arguments and deliver your points including shattering conclusions along the way. Leave the reader thinking and reassessing.

    Moments in the film have the quality of revelation. In Psycho (which seems a distant cousin) people left the cinemas terrified at violence being so real and feasible. Audiences were thrown off their axes by an unexpected killing at an unexpected point. Haneke manipulates his viewers in an even more calculating way, toying with them (us) and dangling hope before snatching it away cruelly (while rewriting the rules of the fourth wall at the same time).

    He tells us things we probably didn't want to know and puts us through gruelling moments of silent agony that go beyond anything I have ever seen before. It is like Irreversible, Straw Dogs and A Short Film About Killing but so much worse (and operating in different ways to these diverse chillers).

    Bleak and coruscating. This is cinema at its most provocative. I defy anyone to not either love or hate this film. I hated it early on and even more so as it went on. I hated it like I hate myself when I have done something wrong. I hated it because it scared me witless.

    • russio
      • russio from Harlow
  • 69 out of 75 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star [Highly rated reviewer]

    Utter rubbish! Avoid!!

    This film has no redeeming qualities at all - I wouldn't want to waste any more of my life even trying to begin to explain how bad this film is - it was like watching a rusty nail descending through a jar of honey - totally pointless. I only gave it one star because there's no option to give no stars.

  • 26 out of 27 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 5 stars

    Anti-Hollywood at its finest

    As Haneke said : Some people leave before the end of my films and thats fine, they obviously didnt need it, its those who see it through that not only need it but will ultimately understand my work.

    I feel sorry for those in the former catagory, for Haneke offers so much more than the dreary, big budget, happily ever after Spielberg style that we have become bogged down with. This is the antithesis of the sickly, schmultzy Hollywood crap which we are becoming more and more tired of. This is quite simply a great film and my advice is simple. Watch it, its good to be shocked, thats how boundaries are pushed and Haneke is most certainly doing that (even if you agree with nothing else).

      • stuart lomas from Sunny Exmouth
  • 22 out of 28 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    What a waste of time

    WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP!!!!!!!. I'VE SEEN MORE FRIGHTENING SPIDERS!!!!!

      • A customer from UK
  • 18 out of 20 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    TERRIBLE!

    NOT GOING TO BOTHER! ENOUGH SAID.

      • A customer from GLASGOW
  • 15 out of 15 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 2 stars

    2 stars for disturbing 5 for shock value

    Always watch a film first without reading or knowing of any hype surrounding it and you always get your freshest opinion... well, I certainly did in this case. I was genuinely uncomfortable viewing this as I realise you are supposed to (if not, then you should be in a cell of the padded kind). Every family's nightmare of the harshest invasion to your home and loved ones. Mental and physical cruelty abound as the two glove wearing intruders torture a family in their holiday home. I appreciated this film certainly more AFTER watching it rather than during!!

      • Scully from Rochford, Essex
  • 15 out of 18 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star [Highly rated reviewer]

    Boring, slow and uneventful

    The idea of a violent and disturbing film that does not actually show any violence on screen sounded like an interesting concept to me. Based on some of the reviews on this site, it sounded like the film pulled it off well and still remained to disturb or shock viewers.

    Well here's the other side of the fence for you...this film was total crap and not worthy of renting at all! Two poncy white glove wearing teenagers put a wife, husband and their child through hell for a day by playing 'funny games' with them, that all starts by dropping some eggs or something or other. Things turn nasty, but not interesting, as the film slowly struggles along and you sit there wondering why this was labelled as a controversial film?! And i can't see the message about real life violence that the director has intended either...sorry mate.

    In conclusion....if you're after realism or a controversial film, rent something like Nil By Mouth, that is actually believable and extremely well directed / filmed / acted! But this film is a load of Jane Horrocks!

  • 14 out of 15 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 5 stars

    Disturbing, controversial and very interesting.

    The lack of explicit violence does not make this film any less disturbing, but adds to the eerie atmosphere of the film, and consequently makes the film even more subversive. Directly after I’ve watched this film I felt appalled and considered “Funny Games” to be the worst film I’ve ever seen. But it didn’t take long before I realise that this is the effect the director tries to achieve, and even though disturbing seems to be Haneke’s trademark, this film is so original and heart wrenching that I would sincerely recommend it to anyone interested in extremely subversive cinema (I am aware of the pretentiousness of that phrase, but don’t let that stop you from hiring this film). Even though the film is quite horrific, and perhaps not for the faint hearted, its high level of realism and emotional tension involve the reader more personally than most other films manage to do.

      • SimonANDSara from London
  • 13 out of 15 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    Who's laughing?

    I'm a big fan of horror, but this is just trash - a bad teen movie without the self-awareness. It plays on the fear of invasion of privacy, and contains a twist which is supposed to be a comment on filmic reality, but ultimately its unsophisticated and fairly painful to watch. Whether you're after something silly and fun, or something a bit higher brow (like I was), I wouldn't bother if I were you.

      • A customer from Newcastle upon Tyne
  • 9 out of 13 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    can't read the subtitles

    Had to abandon this movie after about 10 minutes as the flakey white subtitles were illegible whenever the action had a white background. This was too annoying to bear.

      • Michael Landless from Thatcham, Berks
  • 6 out of 6 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 4 stars

    A Sadistic Study In Violence

    You'll need a strong stomach and nerves of steel to withstand this chilling film, an ice-cold study in violence and voyeurism from Michael Haneke, director of "The Piano Teacher". A nice middle class couple and their young son drive to their country house for the weekend, and are attacked by two young intruders who subject them to a night of physical and psychological torment. Unusually, he refrains from showing violence onscreen, leaving us to infer the worst from shots of splattering blood or the victims' screams, and reminds us of our complicity in the action by having the torturers wink conspiratorially at the audience. The family are offered a means of escape only to have Haneke literally rewind proceedings and drag them back into the inferno. Haneke's desire to reawaken his audience to the horror of violence is commendable, but his direction has a sadistic rigour rivalling his fictional psychopaths.

      • Kiwiboy from London
  • Critics' reviews (4)

  • 3 stars out of 5

    This controversial, cautionary tale from Austrian director Michael Haneke is lauded in some circles for being an uncompromising study of on-screen violence and, in others, as the worst type of exploitation that panders to the same base instincts it purports to lay bare. It follows two young men who inveigle their way into the holiday home of a middle-class family and subject them to degrading torture and sickening humiliation. Haneke's deconstruction of matter-of-fact terror is radical and thought-provoking, but also too clever by half. Setting out to appal the senses with a catalogue of true horror, Haneke succeeds in his aim with a powerful “shockumentary“ that's hard to watch — deliberately. It's definitely not for the faint-hearted.

    • Radio Times
  • 3 stars out of 4

    A disturbing film, intended as a polemic against film-makers and audiences who enjoy gratuitous violence; the violence here is presented in a way to make it seem painful rather than thrilling.

    • Halliwell's Film Guide
  • Continuing the fascination with violence and its representation evident in his earlier films, Haneke's movie may be... read more on Time Out

    • Time Out
  • "...[A] beautifully acted and paced German variant of CAPE FEAR..."

    • New York Times

Buy from the LOVEFiLM shop


    • Funny Games
      A powerfully graphic film (even though no violence is ever shown on the screen itself) about an Austrian family who goes on a country vacation and become the victims of two cold-blooded psychopaths who are out to torture them with their "funny games." Haneke's point, that fictional violence is as ...

Rating breakdown

4,147 Member ratings
  • 100
483
  • 90
403
  • 80
919
  • 70
726
  • 60
587
  • 50
340
  • 40
275
  • 30
146
  • 20
180
  • 10
88

Related user collection

Celebrity collection

Bill Nighy (13)
Average rating: 3.29   65.8% from 52 members