In 1860's lower Manhattan, the Five Points section is a dark, teeming corner of the city known for vice and chaos. Into this frontier of lawlessness arrives the young Irish American, Amsterdam Vallon. Amsterdam is the orphaned son of the slain Priest Vallon--once chief warrior of the Dead Rabbits gang that rallied the Irish .. Read more
| Starring | Leonardo DiCaprio, Daniel Day-Lewis, Cameron Diaz, Jim Broadbent |
|---|---|
| Director | Martin Scorsese |
| Genres | Drama |
loading...
Bringing director Martin Scorsese's fascination with the New York underworld back to its bloody, primal roots, this brutal, occasionally muddled, but always riveting dream project centres on Manhattan gang warfare in the 1860s. It begins with a gruesome street battle between the Nativists (gang members of Anglo-Saxon descent) and the Dead Rabbits (more recently arrived Irish-Americans), during which the latter's leader, Priest Vallon (a brief but striking appearance from Liam Neeson), is slaughtered in front of his young son. Sixteen years later, Priest's son, Amsterdam (played by Leonardo DiCaprio in a disappointingly one-note performance), returns to the Five Points district in New York where the Nativists now rule supreme and insinuates himself with the gang in order to avenge his father. However, his evolving relationship with Nativist boss Bill the Butcher (a searing performance from Daniel Day-Lewis) tempers his anger and provides the young man with a dilemma. If the film never marries its complex political intrigue with the more simplistic personal stories — the surrogate father-son set-up between Amsterdam and Bill or Amsterdam's spiky romance with pickpocket Jenny Everdeane (Cameron Diaz) — the epic sweep is breathtaking, the attention to detail intoxicating and Daniel Day-Lewis's turn is unmissable.
Sprawling epic account of the making of modern New York, enlivened by a roistering performance from Day-Lewis, who overshadows a miscast DiCaprio; Scorsese's ambition is evident, but his adherence to conventional devices of revenge and romance pull the mo
Based on Herbert Asbury's history of criminal New York in the mid-19th century, this is nothing less than Scorsese's... read more on Time Out
Daniel Day Lewis comes onto our screens about once in every three years. It is as though he prepares himself for the role, for that entire time, and the performances that he leaves us with just get better and better. The man is a genius and his portrayal of William Cutting, affectionately known as ?The Butcher? is nothing short of terrifying.
Gangs of New York is a raw, unforgiving look at the ?salad bowl? rather than the ?melting pot? that was New York during the American Civil War. The Butcher is the self-styled king of five points, New York. He leads ?the natives? brutally against the Irish and Black immigrants, flooding into New York every week.
The film opens with some of the best cinematography since [Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon] and [Road to Perdition]. Sublime editing, a great mixture of camera lenses and angles, plus the perennial slow motion fight sequences all help grab the viewer?s attention from the opening credits.
Leonardo DiCaprio has been at war with the critics regarding his acting ability since he ?sold out? to Titanic. As Amsterdam, he plays the young vengeful orphan well. If anything, the script should have defined his character better, but DiCaprio gives everything he can, with the role provided.
Scorsese has done it again with Gangs of New York and it was a touch of genius casting Cameron Diaz as Jenny.
If you liked Gangs of New York then you may also like to hire [In The Name of The Father], [Last of the Mohicans] and [Titanic].
If you like historically inaccurate, pointless drivel along the lines of; Pearl Harbour, The Patriot, Braveheart, U-571, Titanic, Far and Away, then this is the film for you.
However if you prefer a film with good characterisation, a story with some point to it and decent acting, then avoid The Gangs of New York, because it doesn't have any of these.
Daniel Day Lewis is the 1 saving grace of the film, but he can't prevent it from being a complete lump of dog poo. Leo Capreeo is totally miscast, Cameron Diaz is irrelevant, the other characters? There are none. All the other players are mere decoration.
I don't know what happened with this film, I can only assume most of it ended up on the cutting room floor. Scorcese can't be happy with the end result, it looks sloppy and amateurish.
DO NOT WASTE AN EVENING WITH THIS!!!
Martin Scorcese's most original gangster flick features two of the world's greatest actors, Leonardo Di Caprio and Daniel Day Lewis, at their very best..
This film is worth seeing for Daniel Day Lewis alone. Aside from his performance, it's also an interesting history lesson in the politics of the time. The vision and realisation of the city in its early history are magnificent. However, I do think that Cameron Diaz is mis cast and Leonardo DiCaprio is weak. There is little chemistry between these two and interest wavers during the middle part of the film where their relationship takes centre stage.
Over blown self indulgent waffle.I admit to having fell asleep for about an hour during the film but was assured by my partner that i hadn't missed anything! I'm giving it 2 stars for Neeson, Day Lewis,Gleeson and Reily.Someone has said in their comments that Daniel Day Lewis is no De Niro, well for me thank god he isn't,don't get me wrong i like De Niro but am pi##ed off with him playing gangsters ( or in his new found niche as grumpy grandad), you don't see him trying to play a brit, infact he doesn't step out of his comfort zone.An intense actor but limited in my eyes.De Niro is no Daniel Day Lewis. I know this is uncool and i can sense the brick bats coming , you can't say anything bad about De Niro.
Back to the film, i just couldn't get into it (when i was awake) seemed pretty unbelievable.
I wouldn't recommend it unless DiCaprio gets you moist.
Daniel Day Lewis comes onto our screens about once in every three years. It is as though he prepares himself for the role, for that entire time, and the performances that he leaves us with just get better and better. The man is a genius and his portrayal of William Cutting, affectionately known as ?The Butcher? is nothing short of terrifying.
Gangs of New York is a raw, unforgiving look at the ?salad bowl? rather than the ?melting pot? that was New York during the American Civil War. The Butcher is the self-styled king of five points, New York. He leads ?the natives? brutally against the Irish and Black immigrants, flooding into New York every week.
The film opens with some of the best cinematography since [Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon] and [Road to Perdition]. Sublime editing, a great mixture of camera lenses and angles, plus the perennial slow motion fight sequences all help grab the viewer?s attention from the opening credits.
Leonardo DiCaprio has been at war with the critics regarding his acting ability since he ?sold out? to Titanic. As Amsterdam, he plays the young vengeful orphan well. If anything, the script should have defined his character better, but DiCaprio gives everything he can, with the role provided.
Scorsese has done it again with Gangs of New York and it was a touch of genius casting Cameron Diaz as Jenny.
If you liked Gangs of New York then you may also like to hire [In The Name of The Father], [Last of the Mohicans] and [Titanic].
If you like historically inaccurate, pointless drivel along the lines of; Pearl Harbour, The Patriot, Braveheart, U-571, Titanic, Far and Away, then this is the film for you.
However if you prefer a film with good characterisation, a story with some point to it and decent acting, then avoid The Gangs of New York, because it doesn't have any of these.
Daniel Day Lewis is the 1 saving grace of the film, but he can't prevent it from being a complete lump of dog poo. Leo Capreeo is totally miscast, Cameron Diaz is irrelevant, the other characters? There are none. All the other players are mere decoration.
I don't know what happened with this film, I can only assume most of it ended up on the cutting room floor. Scorcese can't be happy with the end result, it looks sloppy and amateurish.
DO NOT WASTE AN EVENING WITH THIS!!!
Martin Scorcese's most original gangster flick features two of the world's greatest actors, Leonardo Di Caprio and Daniel Day Lewis, at their very best..
Martin Scorseses epic is amazing in every way. The acting is amazing with Daniel Day-Lewis seriously pushing boundaries as the utterly menacing Bill the Butcher. The sets are stunning perhaps only equalled by Saving Private Ryan. Scorseses directing is brilliant and it doesnt take an expect to see, well, what an expert he is.
However, in the end it falls short of being the total film experience. The subject matter is such that it is not universally involving and I would imagine to fully appreciate this film you would need to actually be American and preferably a lifelong New Yorker. its too long; I was getting seriously twitchy as the film entered the final hour.
Anyway, there it is. Four stars from me.
Don't believe the hype! Daniel Day Lewis the only high point in this pointless film which looks good on paper. Horrid mindless violence too, which doesn't normally bother me (big slasher fan) and seems just tacked in there for the sake of it.
I stubbornly ignored everyone's advice and, encouraged by one or two 5 star reviews, ordered Gangs of New York hoping I would find something most people had missed. I even persuaded my missus to give it a go. After 10 minutes I gave up trying to justify the *terrible dialogue*, the *overplayed plot*, the *exaggerate set*, the *clichéd characterisations*, the *unconvincing love story*, the *badly edited and amateurish production*, (need I go on?), and took a second to ask myself,
What does this film offer?
Answer: nothing...
I couldn't believe it myself but there you go - utter nonsense with no redeeming features. I can't believe there are any good reviews of this trash.
Save your evening - AVOID THIS FILM!!!!
The problem with this movie is that right from the opening scene it offers so much,but then fails to deliver.
Di Caprio is just not believable,Diaz character is totally superfluous & so many good idea's are lost in a late rush to keep the movie to a manageable length.
The final showdown could have been a hollywood classic to rival 'High Noon' or 'The Good,The Bad & The Ugly',but instead Scorsese blows it by trying to be too clever & dropping too many unrelated & abstract events into one single morning on screen .
Having said that,Daniel Day Lewis justifies 3 stars on his own.A superb performance(again)from a master of his art.His William 'Bill The Butcher' Cutting is a genuinely psychotic & dangerously evil character study.
Scorcese says 'it took 30yrs to make the film i always wanted to do'.
Well its over hyped, over dramatic andlost the plot.
Dicaprio dont work for me his accent is terrible,Diaz like wise. LOVE AFFAIR bah tosh.
Thank goodness for Daniel Day Lewis as Bill,he should have got an oscar for putting up with this no plot, historical drivel
2/5
Scorsese's latest effort is a story that has taken him 30 years to produce. The film serves both as an action-packed street-gang movie and an allegorical tale of how America - or more precisely, New York - was born. The film entertains far more than most of the years blockbusters have but in comparison to Scorsese's earlier work it still feels middling rather than masterful. Scorsese again proves he's an artist not a film-maker with some beautiful visuals and blood-soaked authenticity, and Dicaprio shows that there is more to him than looking pretty, but its Daniel Day Lewis who steals the plaudits. His portrayal of Bill 'The Butcher' is astounding, he oozes power and presence in every scene he features. It is no coincidence that the role was originally intended for Robert DeNiro because Day Lewis bears an uncanny resemblance to a young DeNiro in both his mannerisms and his harsh intensity; easily the best thing in the movie its a crime his oscar nomination was unsuccessful. The film drags in places - mainly when Day Lewis is off screen - and the romance between Dicaprio and Diaz seems pointless but overall the film is good value and certainly worth a look if only for Day Lewis. Great stuff!
Scorsese's latest is also possibly the most shallow film he has directed. Although the running time would suggest an epic film, in fact it has little depth. Behind the impressive fight scenes is a very simple tale of love and revenge. DiCaprio really hasn't got the dramatic weight to make his character work, and Diaz barely makes an impression. The only real star is Daniel Day-Lewis, who's performance walks a fine line between well-acted and hammy. A few familiar faces in the supporting cast (John C. Reiley, Brendan Gleeson) add some life to the proceedings.
The length of this film is unnecessary - the story isn't nearly strong enough to support 3 hours of footage - so the film does start to lag at some points. The battle scene at the end is, however, well shot and directed.
On the whole it is not terrible, but really nothing special considering who the director is.
Bringing director Martin Scorsese's fascination with the New York underworld back to its bloody, primal roots, this brutal, occasionally muddled, but always riveting dream project centres on Manhattan gang warfare in the 1860s. It begins with a gruesome street battle between the Nativists (gang members of Anglo-Saxon descent) and the Dead Rabbits (more recently arrived Irish-Americans), during which the latter's leader, Priest Vallon (a brief but striking appearance from Liam Neeson), is slaughtered in front of his young son. Sixteen years later, Priest's son, Amsterdam (played by Leonardo DiCaprio in a disappointingly one-note performance), returns to the Five Points district in New York where the Nativists now rule supreme and insinuates himself with the gang in order to avenge his father. However, his evolving relationship with Nativist boss Bill the Butcher (a searing performance from Daniel Day-Lewis) tempers his anger and provides the young man with a dilemma. If the film never marries its complex political intrigue with the more simplistic personal stories — the surrogate father-son set-up between Amsterdam and Bill or Amsterdam's spiky romance with pickpocket Jenny Everdeane (Cameron Diaz) — the epic sweep is breathtaking, the attention to detail intoxicating and Daniel Day-Lewis's turn is unmissable.
Sprawling epic account of the making of modern New York, enlivened by a roistering performance from Day-Lewis, who overshadows a miscast DiCaprio; Scorsese's ambition is evident, but his adherence to conventional devices of revenge and romance pull the mo
Based on Herbert Asbury's history of criminal New York in the mid-19th century, this is nothing less than Scorsese's... read more on Time Out