Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire details
| Formats: | 12 DVD, Blu-ray |
|---|---|
| Starring: | Michael G, Clemence Po, Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Robbie Coltrane, Ralph Fiennes, Michael Gambon, Gary Oldman, Miranda Richardson, Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith, Timothy Spall, Brendan Gleeson, Jason Isaacs, Robert Pattinson |
| Director: | Mike Newell |
| Genres: | Children, Family - Action/Adventure, Sci-Fi/Fantasy - Action/Adventure, Fantasy - General |
| Studio: | WARNER HOME VIDEO |
| Collections: | Fantasy Worlds, Harry Potter, Top 400 All-Time Rentals |
| Name | Discs | |
|---|---|---|
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire |
12 Feature |
DVD Information
| Run time: | 2 hours 30 minutes |
|---|---|
| Rental release: | 20 Mar 2006 |
| Main languages: | English, Audio Description |
| Subtitles: | Arabic, English, Greek, Icelandic |
| Hearing impaired subtitles: | English |
Write your own review
LOVEFiLM Review
-
By Tom Charity from LOVEFiLMThis year, Hogwarts is hosting the Tri Wizard festival, and there may be a plot afoot to off Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) during the proceedings.
- Was this review helpful to you?
- (0) Yes |
- No (0)
Most helpful review
Like all the Harry ...
By Rip from Manchester , 13 Jun 2006[Highly rated reviewer]
[Highly rated reviewer]
Like all the Harry Potter films this is excellent.
I always look forward to enjoying a good 2 hours of magic.
great to see Miss Jones from 'Rising Damp' on the screen again too!- Was this review helpful to you?
- (76) Yes |
- No (5)
All reviews
(371)Getting even more ridiculous
By PurpleHiraikotsuRider (3 reviews) , 22 May 2012As an avid fantasy fan, I was disappointed when this movie, like its predecessors, contained unnecessary plots from the book while removing essential pieces of the story in attempt to 'stay true' to the book. As always, the acting was abysmal, and the movie wasn't even half over before I identified it as the most ridiculous Harry Potter film so far and don't believe they can become much worse.- Was this review helpful to you?
- (0) Yes |
- No (2)
more interesting story and plot
By denis007 (133 reviews) , 04 Mar 2012I am now watching the whole series of Harry Potter and since I first watching the series, I'd say that this one is definitely the most interesting of the Harry Potter series. I truly enjoyed the plot, the special effect and the participation of Robert Pattisson. For once, the beginning of Harry Potter did not start at his uncle's home like it did in the first three episodes. It was a bit too predictable and I expected it to happen again. What a fresh change this time!- Was this review helpful to you?
- (1) Yes |
- No (2)
Takes a bit to get going but gets there in the end
By Bassman71 (618 reviews) from Didsbury, England , 28 Nov 2011Fourth year for the students at Hogwarts and Harry is mysteriously entered into a wizard tournament, has to complete tasks, sinister forces at work, all is not what it seems.
Slightly long-winded yarn this time but makes up for it with some excellent action scenes and the additions of Brendan Gleeson, Ralph Fiennes, a young Robert Pattinson and a superb if brief turn from David Tennant.
The CGI is even better than before and some truly spectacular set-pieces but it does take a bit to get going rather than drawing you in like the other films.
Music is passed over to Patrick Doyle from John Williams but, as before, the music is very well done.- Was this review helpful to you?
- (1) Yes |
- No (1)
in the top 3 is this one
By tominsptwo (73 reviews) from Wakefield , 23 Nov 2011this is a great potter installment, one of the best, a great story unfolds always a twist in this one All the harry potter films are fantastic, this one isnt an exception, great cast and a even better story help make this one of the best film series in a very long time- Was this review helpful to you?
- (0) Yes |
- No (1)
GOBLET OF DIRE
By a customer , 10 Nov 2011What could have been a spectacular treatment of children growing-up into responsible adults turns into a rather pointless spectacle; masquerading as entertainment. The children's powers don't represent a flowering of their innate gifts, but an excuse for special effects' pseudo-creativity in visuals serving little dramatic purpose. There is a terrible lack of imagination here: A strong sense of making it up as they go along - not to stretch a child's imagination, but to conform to adult limitations.
The actors cannot make their parts live because they lack a precocious understanding of their own adolescence, nor much acting talent. However, pubescent jealousies, sexual feelings and ethical choices are depicted; eventually making the drama more engaging. The only other pleasure here is watching respected British thespians hamming it up for all they are worth.- Was this review helpful to you?
- (0) Yes |
- No (1)
