E.M. Forster's 1910 novel is adapted for the screen by Merchant Ivory Productions in this masterful Edwardian Age romance directed by James Ivory. The dying Ruth Wilcox (Vanessa Redgrave) wishes to leave her country home, Howards End, to Margaret Schlegel (Emma Thompson in an Academy Award-winning role), a modest woman of .. Read more
| Starring | Anthony Hopkins, Prunella Scales, Vanessa Redgrave, Emma Thompson |
|---|---|
| Director | James Ivory |
| Genres | Drama |
loading...
E.M. Forster's 1910 novel is adapted for the screen by Merchant Ivory Productions in this masterful Edwardian Age romance directed by James Ivory. The dying Ruth Wilcox (Vanessa Redgrave) wishes to leave her country home, Howards End, to Margaret Schlegel (Emma Thompson in an Academy Award-winning role), a modest woman of little means who will soon be forced out of her own home in London. But Ruth's husband, Henry (Anthony Hopkins), an upper middle class businessman, keeps secret her desire even after he and Margaret become friends. However, after Henry and Margaret marry, their class differences and philosophies threaten to cause them unhappiness. Margaret's sister, Helen (Helena Bonham Carter), is disgusted by the Wilcox's snobbish ways and is attracted to helping struggling clerk Leonard Bast (Sam West) improve his position. Merchant-Ivory screenwriter Ruth Prawer Jhabvala was the force behind adapting this Forster novel into a film, winning her second Academy Award for her screenplay; her first Oscar was for A ROOM WITH A VIEW.
| Starring | Anthony Hopkins, Prunella Scales, Vanessa Redgrave, Emma Thompson, James Wilby, Samuel West, Helena Bonham-Carter |
|---|---|
| Director | James Ivory |
| Studio | FILM 4 |
| Run time | DVD: 2 hrs 16 mins |
| Certificate | |
| Genres | Drama |
| Language | DVD: English |
| Released | DVD: 24 Feb 2003 Production year: 1992 |
| Format | DVD |
"...Incisively witty, provocative and acted to perfection, this sublime entertainment is a career peak for producer Ismail Merchant, director James Ivory and screenwriter Ruth Prawer Jhabvala..."
"...[Merchant, Ivory and Jhabvala] triumph again....[Thompson] comes into her own...[with] the film's guiding performance..."
This is very much a slow-burner of a film. It moves at a leisurely pace, for much of the first half following three largely separate plot threads. Hopkins, the major reason for my selecting the film, also has very little to do in the first third or so, but patience became rewarded as his character assumes its greater prominence and the diverse elements are drawn closer together.
The is on one level the story of three families and how their paths first cross and then become inextricably entwined; on another it?s an examination of the prevailing, but evolving, Edwardian, social order where a privileged and remote upper class seek to preserve for themselves their inherited and commercial wealth at the expense of an impoverished, financially insecure under-class. The former is represented by the Wilcox family, whose patriarch is superbly played by Hopkins, the latter by the Basts, while the Schlegel sisters (Thompson and Bonham-Carter) are the intellectual middle class, acting both as narrative observers and hinges on which the developing plot turns.
As one would expect of this production team, the sense of time and place is well caught, and the all-British cast are just right for their essentially outwardly mannered, socially and emotionally constrained, characters. Thompson?s somewhat affected acting style, which I personally find grating in contemporarily-set films, is absolutely spot-on for this character and context; Bonham-Carter is wild-child in an appropriately restrained fashion; and although at first I thought Samual West?s accent a little strained, I quickly realised that this was actually his character Bast speaking, as trying to better himself out of his natural social class he speaks more ?properly? than perhaps would have come naturally.
In terms of plot and character, the film is very faithful to its source. In translation to screen, though, perhaps some of the complexity of the novel?s metaphors and symbolism is lost. I?m not sure, if I were not familiar with the source, if the film would have been enough for me to realise the symbolism of Howard?s End itself as England / Empire, its physical location for the transformation of a rural to an urban economy, with the very subject of its inheritance serving as metaphor for what kind of new social order should prevail in society.
Nevertheless, on its own merits, the film is a wonderful, slow, peripatetic, and ultimately rewarding journey.
This is very much a slow-burner of a film. It moves at a leisurely pace, for much of the first half following three largely separate plot threads. Hopkins, the major reason for my selecting the film, also has very little to do in the first third or so, but patience became rewarded as his character assumes its greater prominence and the diverse elements are drawn closer together.
The is on one level the story of three families and how their paths first cross and then become inextricably entwined; on another it?s an examination of the prevailing, but evolving, Edwardian, social order where a privileged and remote upper class seek to preserve for themselves their inherited and commercial wealth at the expense of an impoverished, financially insecure under-class. The former is represented by the Wilcox family, whose patriarch is superbly played by Hopkins, the latter by the Basts, while the Schlegel sisters (Thompson and Bonham-Carter) are the intellectual middle class, acting both as narrative observers and hinges on which the developing plot turns.
As one would expect of this production team, the sense of time and place is well caught, and the all-British cast are just right for their essentially outwardly mannered, socially and emotionally constrained, characters. Thompson?s somewhat affected acting style, which I personally find grating in contemporarily-set films, is absolutely spot-on for this character and context; Bonham-Carter is wild-child in an appropriately restrained fashion; and although at first I thought Samual West?s accent a little strained, I quickly realised that this was actually his character Bast speaking, as trying to better himself out of his natural social class he speaks more ?properly? than perhaps would have come naturally.
In terms of plot and character, the film is very faithful to its source. In translation to screen, though, perhaps some of the complexity of the novel?s metaphors and symbolism is lost. I?m not sure, if I were not familiar with the source, if the film would have been enough for me to realise the symbolism of Howard?s End itself as England / Empire, its physical location for the transformation of a rural to an urban economy, with the very subject of its inheritance serving as metaphor for what kind of new social order should prevail in society.
Nevertheless, on its own merits, the film is a wonderful, slow, peripatetic, and ultimately rewarding journey.
Thank heavens for Emma Thompson! The House of Lords may fall. Our MPs may act like lemmings, and poor old Susan Boyle is surely the British cultural icon we deserve… but as this week’s cinema release Last Chance Harvey proves, Emma Thompson prevails, a comforting reminder of Empire and order, a Britain where quality, common sense and self-deprecating wit trump tabloid fame and sleaze. She would demur, I’m sure, but Thompson is your mum’s idea of what a British film star Read more
* The Amazon.co.uk prices on our site are updated every 24 hours and may not be up to date at the time you view this page.
To see the current new and "new and used" Amazon.co.uk prices, please click on the Buy button.