When Lila Jute (Patricia Arquette), a nature writer with excessive body hair, meets Nathan Bronfman (Tim Robbins), an obsessive/compulsive scientist attempting to teach mice table manners, the two begin an unlikely romance. On a hiking trip, the new couple encounters a feral young man (Rhys Ifans) living in the woods and .. Read more
| Starring | Tim Robbins, Patricia Arquette, Rhys Ifans, Miranda Otto |
|---|---|
| Director | Michel Gondry |
| Genres | Comedy |
loading...
When Lila Jute (Patricia Arquette), a nature writer with excessive body hair, meets Nathan Bronfman (Tim Robbins), an obsessive/compulsive scientist attempting to teach mice table manners, the two begin an unlikely romance. On a hiking trip, the new couple encounters a feral young man (Rhys Ifans) living in the woods and decides to bring him back to the city. Named Puff by Nathan's sexy French assistant, Gabrielle (Miranda Otto), the untamed lad slowly learns about language, culture, and civilization under Nathan's skewed guidance. Meanwhile, Nathan begins to fall for Gabrielle, and the libidos of all parties involved begin to rage, leading to drastic measures.
One of the most unusual screenwriters to emerge in decades, Charlie Kaufman follows up his acclaimed BEING JOHN MALKOVICH script with another amazingly inventive and oddly humorous screenplay. And as with MALKOVICH, Kaufman's writing is equally matched by excellent direction, this time courtesy of Michel Gondry. Like Spike Jonze (a producer on this film), the first-time feature director is well known for his visually stunning collaborations with Icelandic singer Bjork--most notably her ground breaking "Human Behaviour" video. The resulting movie bears a charming storybook atmosphere that is enhanced by the appropriately quirky performances of Robbins, Arquette, Ifans, and Otto. Playfully taking on preconceived notions of "wilderness" and "civilization," HUMAN NATURE presents poignant social satire in the clever guise of an exceptionally entertaining film.
| Starring | Tim Robbins, Patricia Arquette, Rhys Ifans, Miranda Otto, Robert Forster, Mary Kay Place, Miguel Sandoval, Rosie Perez |
|---|---|
| Director | Michel Gondry |
| Studio | PATHE DISTRIBUTION |
| Run time | DVD: 1 hr 32 mins |
| Certificate | |
| Genres | Comedy |
| Language | DVD: English |
| Hearing-impaired | English |
| Subtitles | DVD: English |
| Released | DVD: 04 Aug 2003 Production year: 2001 |
| Format | DVD |
Charlie Kaufman can't quite recapture the eccentric glories of Being John Malkovich with this gleefully lewd screenplay. However, plucky performances from Patricia Arquette and Rhys Ifans (involving much nudity) keep promo wizard Michel Gondry's makeshift feature debut from collapsing under the weight of its percipient, but largely undeveloped ideas. The notion that civilisation is built upon sexual repression has plenteous comic potential. But the narrative involving the long-haired Arquette, the lustily primitive Ifans and dullard scientist Tim Robbins quickly exhausts its supply of laughs and logic, and ends up wallowing in crass slapstick and cheerful smut. It's fun,but hardly profound.
Afer a diastrous Cannes premiere in 2001, this is still awaiting a UK theatrical release. It has all those wacky-genius... read more on Time Out
This is recognisably a Kaufman film, with all the usual preoccupations. Tim Robbins stars as Dr Bronfman (usually pronounced to rhyme with Kaufman, hmmmmm), a scientist obsessed due to his traumatic childhood with teaching table manners to mice. He begins a romance with Lila (Patricia Arquette), a young woman who has become an outcast from society due to her embarrassing hirsutism problem. Into this equation enters Rhys Ifans' 'Puff', a man who has been brought up in the forest believing himself to be a pygmy chimp; and finally there is Dr Bronfman's glamorous French lab assistant Gabrielle (Miranda Otto - Eowyn from LotR, hobbit fans!), whose romantic designs on her boss caused her to remind me of Mary Svevo from Eternal Sunshine to a suspicious degree.
The development of this love square is extremely chaotically framed - frankly the script is all over the place, but I've always had the impression that this was the default setting for Kaufman's writing. But there are plenty of moments of genius, as you'd expect. The little mice with electrodes in their brain being forced to eat their salad with the outermost fork are worth the admission price on their own, and Rhys Ifans steals the show as Puff, forced to transition from furiously masturbating monkey man to a perfect gentleman equally at home reading Wittgenstein or dancing the tango. Then there's Dr Bronfman's parents' new and better six-year-old son, Wayne, whose unfailing ability to provoke Bronfman's rivalry and inferiority complex makes several dinner table scenes an absolute delight.
There's as much that's thought-provoking here as in any other Kaufman film, too, despite the lewd comedy overtones. Is it better to live as a beast giving free rein to all desires, or as a repressed and unhappy civilised being? I won't give away the ending, but suffice to say it's surprising and very entertaining.
All in all, if you're a fan of Charlie Kaufman, track this down. It's nowhere near his best, but it's far from mediocre and definitely well worth your time.
Michel Gondrys first collaboration with Charlie Kaufman is a mad, scattershot thing. The performers (Tim Robbins, Rhys Ifans, Patricia Arquette and Miranda Otto) all get the wacky tone right but it lacks both the connection to reality that made Eternal Sunshine so moving and the absolutely out there insanity that made Being John Malkovich so striking. It ends up somewhere in the middle; eccentric, relatively entertaining, and sometimes very funny (particularly Ottos contribution and a cameo from Peter Dinklage) but theres no real through line, and little to care about.
It's taken over a year for Michel Gondry's movie to get a UK release since its Sundance premiere. During that time it's twice been pushed back in the calendar, presumably because Warner Bros - who picked up international distribution rights at the festival - don't have a clue what to do with it. In the US, it made less than $5 million. I mention this not because a film's box office take is any indication of its quality, but because Hollywood always finds it harder to sell something different.... Read more