Infamous cover art

Infamous Reviews

2006 Certificate 15
  • Rated:
  • 60
  • from 7553 members

1959 Manhattan was a party, and none of the glitterati glittered brighter than Truman Capote. Then he saw a story in The New York Times: "Wealthy Farmer, 3 of Family Slain," and the party ended for Capote. He plunged into the murder case that inspired his great "nonfiction novel" In Cold Blood and led him into a fevered .. Read more

Starring Jeff Daniels, Daniel Craig, Gwyneth Paltrow, Isabella Rossellini
Director Douglas McGrath
Genres Drama

loading loading...

  • Critics' reviews of Infamous

    View all
  • Its less than fortunate and maybe disastrous for its makers that Infamous is the second film on Truman Capote... read more on Time Out

    • Dave Calhoun, 
    • Time Out
  • Most helpful members' reviews (3) of Infamous

    View all
  • 36 out of 42 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 3 stars

    Truman Capote again

    ‘Infamous’ is about the American author Truman Capote and his obsession with the murder of a farming family in Kansas in 1959 which became the inspiration for his masterpiece ‘In Cold Blood’. Does this sound familiar? It was also the subject-matter of the 2005 film ‘Capote’.

    It is impossible to watch one without comparing it to the other, but there are differences between the two which make ‘Infamous’ worth watching. ‘Capote’ was realistic and wholly believable. Based on Gerald Clarke’s acclaimed biography, it portrayed Truman Capote as a self-centred and determined man manipulating the killers to gain their trust and therefore the material necessary to write his book. ‘Infamous’ is an altogether lighter and more glamorous affair. It is based on ‘Truman Capote’ by George Plimpton and contains fictional scenes and characters and a sprinkling of humour. Truman is portrayed as a softer and more likeable character who becomes emotionally drawn to one of the killers (Daniel Craig) - including a lingering kiss in his jail cell. Toby Jones gives a strong performance as Capote, complete with high-pitched voice, but the film doesn’t allow him to bring quite the depth of character to the role as Philip Seymour Hoffman was allowed in ‘Capote’. Sandra Bullock is a suitably restrained Nelle Harper Lee, but if you are a Gwynneth Paltrow fan be warned that all she does is sing a song.

      • A customer from London, England
  • 21 out of 28 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 4 stars

    Fantastic

    I started watching every Daniel Craig film he ever made, after seeing him in Casino Royale, just because he was so good looking but after each film I have become more and more impressed with him as an actor. In every role you believe he is that person and this film is no different. It takes a little while to kick in, giving the background to Trumans life, but it is still very interesting and you are captivated throughout. The relationship between Truman and Perry is very powerful, the kiss touching and believable. You find yourself torn, Perry deserves to be punished but you want him to live. The last few scences are emotive, I was moved to tears. Superbly acted by the whole cast but especially Craig, Jones and Bullock. A must see film. I will be watching it again and again.

      • A customer from Milton Keynes
  • 15 out of 19 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    Absolutely awful

    With an amazing cast like that - I truly expected something different but what a waste of time!! I normally enjoy movies like this...but certainly wouldnt recommend this one!!!! YAWN...

      • A customer from Kent
  • Most recent members' reviews (2) of Infamous

    View all
  • 2 out of 2 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 3 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    NOT AS ARTY-FARTY AS 'CAPOTE'

    I saw Philip Seymour Hoffman's Oscar winning version, and found it rather tedious. I went for this one too, because it has Daniel Craig in it, and I'm a Bond anorak. The bloke who plays Capote (can't remember his name) must have been waiting all of his life to play this role. Then Hoffman does it with more publicity, and bags an Oscar! Craig looks like he's been enbalmed, and is rather poor. Bond may just be his niche, 'cos everything else bar 'Layer Cake' is pretty weak. This doesn't have it's head up it's arse like 'Capote' did. It's alright, but don't boost it up your list.

      • Norman Barry from Surrey, England.
  • 2 out of 2 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 5 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    Exploring the reality beyond the legendary tale

    When 'Capote' came out la couple of years ago, I anticipated a film that would envelop me the way 'In Cold Blood' did, and I felt shortchanged because that film only touched the surface of the incidents, manipulations, and dynamics that shaped the book and turned the life of that classic author completely around. The movie moved with an almost perverse force that left a bad taste in your mouth. It wasn't a bad piece, but it lacked soul. To this day, I have hesitations about Hoffman's performance which to me always felt a bit artificial.

    Here comes the second film that explores those days in the life of Truman Capote, and this one holds nothing back. In fact, it might show too much of what some people might find a bit controversial. What the film has is an enormous pool of very talented actors, writers, and artists to create an immediate masterwork, a film that is composed of every possible emotion conceivable to humankind. It begins with an overview of the chic celebrity doing what he knows best, exploring and manipulating those around him to create his new work. It is interesting to see the symbiotic relationship between him and his friends. They feed off his each other as they confide their innermost secrets. Everyone here knows what they want, and they're fine with it. It's a lot of fun to see the recreation of those relationships in those gorgeously detailed settings. It's the perfect introduction for the rude awakening of Capote's soul, as he decides to move on to something more important.

    It takes an encounter with perpetrators of unbelievable evil to find his true self. Yet, unlike 'Capote' this one bares the souls of those involved, and some revelations are too powerful to describe in words. This is where the film succeeds, in presenting full bodied interpretations and recreations of those moments that changed the lives of the people involved. It is never sentimental and never too cold. It breathes and beats with a true heart. It never leaves the brain behind, as we never really know where truth and fiction lie. It feels genuine and provocative. It's always engrossing and never feels manipulative. It has Toby Jones' perfect depiction of the qualities that made Capote a legend. Toby also moves seamlessly from his early cynical world to something he might not be able to handle.

    Daniel Craig shines with star power and an intensity few performers can even muster. His Perry is seductive and repulsive, pulsating with a doomed soul that is too much for his miserable existence. He and Jones perform a dangerous and charming dance as they break each other's barriers. Their interaction is the spotlight of the film, and there will be discussion over the film's interpretation of what might have happened.

    Sigourney Weaver, Bogdanovich, Hope Davis, Rossellini, and Bullock all do stupendous work. The film's production values match everything else here. The film is a 5-star gift from Hollywood.

      • crockery from Belfast
  • 36 out of 42 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 3 stars

    Truman Capote again

    ‘Infamous’ is about the American author Truman Capote and his obsession with the murder of a farming family in Kansas in 1959 which became the inspiration for his masterpiece ‘In Cold Blood’. Does this sound familiar? It was also the subject-matter of the 2005 film ‘Capote’.

    It is impossible to watch one without comparing it to the other, but there are differences between the two which make ‘Infamous’ worth watching. ‘Capote’ was realistic and wholly believable. Based on Gerald Clarke’s acclaimed biography, it portrayed Truman Capote as a self-centred and determined man manipulating the killers to gain their trust and therefore the material necessary to write his book. ‘Infamous’ is an altogether lighter and more glamorous affair. It is based on ‘Truman Capote’ by George Plimpton and contains fictional scenes and characters and a sprinkling of humour. Truman is portrayed as a softer and more likeable character who becomes emotionally drawn to one of the killers (Daniel Craig) - including a lingering kiss in his jail cell. Toby Jones gives a strong performance as Capote, complete with high-pitched voice, but the film doesn’t allow him to bring quite the depth of character to the role as Philip Seymour Hoffman was allowed in ‘Capote’. Sandra Bullock is a suitably restrained Nelle Harper Lee, but if you are a Gwynneth Paltrow fan be warned that all she does is sing a song.

      • A customer from London, England
  • 21 out of 28 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 4 stars

    Fantastic

    I started watching every Daniel Craig film he ever made, after seeing him in Casino Royale, just because he was so good looking but after each film I have become more and more impressed with him as an actor. In every role you believe he is that person and this film is no different. It takes a little while to kick in, giving the background to Trumans life, but it is still very interesting and you are captivated throughout. The relationship between Truman and Perry is very powerful, the kiss touching and believable. You find yourself torn, Perry deserves to be punished but you want him to live. The last few scences are emotive, I was moved to tears. Superbly acted by the whole cast but especially Craig, Jones and Bullock. A must see film. I will be watching it again and again.

      • A customer from Milton Keynes
  • 15 out of 19 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 0 stars

    Absolutely awful

    With an amazing cast like that - I truly expected something different but what a waste of time!! I normally enjoy movies like this...but certainly wouldnt recommend this one!!!! YAWN...

      • A customer from Kent
  • 12 out of 14 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 4 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    Same wine, new bottle

    On its own account, this is a pretty good, impressionistic jog through the critical years of Truman Capote's life, when his immense talent and lambent prose became atrophied and his ego (and the booze) took over. The details of the Clutter killings, and Capote reaction to them are well presented, done with a surprising, sprightly sense of the absurd, while perhaps not quite emphasizing the human aspect as much as one might have wished.

    But, of course, it's nearly impossible to take this film simply 'on its own account'. Because, although more starrily cast than Bennett Miller's 'Capote', 'Infamous' had the misfortune to come out six months after the Oscar-winner, and must now live and die by comparisons. Oddly, the two films are so similar that neither really suffers - although Toby Jones' excellent central performance rather shows Philip Seymour Hoffman's turn up as the hollow little impersonation it always was. Conversely, Sandra Bullock's sentimental performance is no match for Catherine Keener's version of Harper Lee. Swings and roundabouts, then.

      • Savage from London, England
  • 9 out of 14 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 1 star

    Yawn!!!

    I tried to act interested when my husband went to bed during the first half hour, but eventually, had to wake myself up to turn it off!!!

      • A customer from Northampton, England
  • 4 out of 4 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 3 stars

    Not totally convinced

    A well acted and scripted film, but I wasn't completely convinced by this second in the telling of the events surrounding Capote's 'In Cold Blood'. Having already watched Capote I was hoping this film would bring something else to this story. It seemed more colourful but lacked the depth of Bennett Miller's version.

    The interviews to camera seemed a little too staged and subtracted from the weight of this film.

    A most worthy watch but couldn't see the point of another version of this story that seemed very similar and didn't add anything to what was already out there.

      • kezza from London
  • 4 out of 4 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 3 stars

    Didn't like it

    Didn't like Capote either , well acted, well filmed just couldn't warm to it at all .

      • A customer from Luton UK
  • 4 out of 4 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 5 stars

    Infamous

    Even better than Capote, yet didn't receive the distribution it deserved just because it came afterwards. Superlative acting and thought-provoking story of moral ambiguity

      • DAVID ROBINSON from Edinburgh
  • 3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 4 stars

    Impressed

    Incredible that two films should be made at the same time about the same subject, but now having seen them both, I must say that I enjoyed Infamous much more than Capote.

    The story was more rounded, the timeline easier to follow and the perfomances impressive. Recommended

      • Paperboy from Surbiton
  • 3 out of 3 people found this review helpful

    Rated - 4 stars [Highly rated reviewer]

    Capote gets his story.

    Having already seen the other film about the book 'In Cold Blood' (i.e. 'Capote'), I actually found that this version starring Toby Jones as the zealous author Truman Capote, Sandra Bullock as his childhood friend Nelle Harper Lee and Daniel Craig as the condemned Perry Smith were much more memorable than their 'Capote' counterparts.

    Indeed the whole cast were much more vibrant and the story was well shot and beautifully edited.

    Those who have seen both versions will have drawn their own conclusions, but like so many witness statements there are always different versions of the same story.

    I felt that this story flowed better, had more impact and was overall more entertaining.

    The cast and crew earned their money and it is a pity that the film did not receive more awards than it did.

    A story well told and well worth the money!

      • Charles Brickley from Andover, Hampshire England
  • Critics' reviews

  • Its less than fortunate and maybe disastrous for its makers that Infamous is the second film on Truman Capote... read more on Time Out

    • Dave Calhoun, 
    • Time Out

Buy from the LOVEFiLM shop


    • Infamous
    • DVD: £2.93
      Free Delivery
    • RRP £19.99 (you save: 85%)
    • 1959 Manhattan was a party, and none of the glitterati glittered brighter than Truman Capote. Then he saw a story in The New York Times: "Wealthy Farmer, 3 of Family Slain," and the party ended for ...

Rating breakdown

7,553 Member ratings
  • 100
468
  • 90
327
  • 80
1,630
  • 70
1,409
  • 60
1,919
  • 50
682
  • 40
504
  • 30
194
  • 20
298
  • 10
122

Celebrity collection

Ray Winstone (6)
Average rating: 3.82   76.4% from 57 members

Related user collection

Previous (147)

Average rating: 3.50   70% from 1 member

by: A customer from Coalville

* The Amazon.co.uk prices on our site are updated every 24 hours and may not be up to date at the time you view this page.
To see the current new and "new and used" Amazon.co.uk prices, please click on the Buy button.