Violence and mayhem ensue after a hunter stumbles upon some dead bodies, a stash of heroin and more than $2 million in cash near the Rio Grande. Read more
| Starring | Tommy Lee Jones, Javier Bardem, Josh Brolin, Woody Harrelson |
|---|---|
| Director | Ethan Coen, Joel Coen |
| Genres | Drama, Thriller |
loading...
Many fine novels buck and bridle under the constraints of movie adaptation. Others open up to the form as if it was a natural evolution, the film complimenting the book and vice versa. John... read more »
West Texas, 1980. Out hunting deer in the desert down by the Mexican border, Vietnam veteran Llewelyn Moss (Josh... read more on Time Out
Was really expecting something special, even though, let's face it, the Coen's can at times be overrated.
Far too slow,not that gripping, with a pointless ending.Don't bother.
The acting is fantastic, and the film is nicely shot. However, the storyline is very slow moving, interrupted only by the occasional action scenes and some very strong violence. There were loud gasps and laughter of disappointment at the end of the film as many in the ('selected preview') audience clearly felt that the film ended without the story coming to a point.
We've seen all this before and didn't really need to see it again. The ingredients in terms of the characters are very similar to Fargo - 1. Ruthless psychopathic killer(s), 2. Ordinary guy with bad motives getting into something over his head, 3. A good-hearted cop, outwardly unimpressive and seemingly impotent in the face of the evil thuggery let loose in the neighbourhood but clever and wise, trying to piece together what's going on and prevent tragedy. The story this time around however is thin and over-familiar - an obsessive vengeful quest, a duel between hunter and hunted that occupies most of the film. The characters too are dull in comparison to their Fargo counterparts. Despite the trademark style and quirky flourishes this is by and large a plodding, predictable exercise in ritualistic machismo. I didn't really care who got killed and when. It is not a masterpiece or even a return to form. The best moment was early on when the old almost retired sheriff and his young sidekick survey the bloody aftermath of a criminal deal gone wrong and exchange banter in theorising about what happened. Instead of developing the younger cop's part the scriptwriter casts it aside half-way through and with it goes much of the interest in the older cop too. The trail of violence runs its course and some empty banalities uttered by the world-weary lawman that pass for significant wisdom bring the proceedings to a close.
THIS FILM IS TOO OVER RATED DIDNT LIKE IT MUCH AT ALL. VERY SLOW AND BORING, ONLY GOOD THING IS THE KILLINGS, REST OF THE STORY RUBBISH
Was really expecting something special, even though, let's face it, the Coen's can at times be overrated.
Far too slow,not that gripping, with a pointless ending.Don't bother.
The acting is fantastic, and the film is nicely shot. However, the storyline is very slow moving, interrupted only by the occasional action scenes and some very strong violence. There were loud gasps and laughter of disappointment at the end of the film as many in the ('selected preview') audience clearly felt that the film ended without the story coming to a point.
this filmm was so slow to get to any of the action that i had to leave the cinema cause i was so bored
On the whole very disappointing. I was looking forward to seeing this film based on very positive press reviews.
The first two thirds are very good. Some of the dialogue, such as the scene where the world-weary Sherrif and his Deputy survey the carnage of the drug heist gone wrong, is outstanding. There are moments of real tension. The cat and mouse game between the two principal characters is truly gripping in places. BTW Kelly MacDonald's accent is impeccable.
But, What the heck happened in the third act?? As of the point where the story reaches El Paso the story goes into meltdown. The Coens lost it. Doesn't reach any kind of point. There is no satisfying conclusion. Didn't like the direction the film took. I left the cinema feeling positively ROBBED. Also, Javier Bardem is a good actor but let's face it, anyone can play a total psycho, and while it was a competent performance I do not think it is Oscar worthy. He was just a killing machine. I didn't get any depth from the character.
I can't believe that this incredibly tedious derivative sub-Peckinpah mess has drawn all the praise that it has received. I can only suppose that the Coens are now considered beyond criticism. This is one of the worst films I've ever seen
my opinion can b summarized in one sentence: THE WORST MOVIE I HAVE EVER SEEN!
I'm not a big fan of the Coen Brothers . I think that a lot of people say they like their movies because it's fashionable to do so. It's what i call' The emperors new clothes syndrome'.
I didn't like O Brother , where art Thou . I thought Fargo was overrated , despite a great performance from William H Macy and i quite liked The Big Labowski .As for The Lady Killers , what were they thinking ?
Despite my reservations of the Coens i went to see No Country for Old Men with an open mind and at last i have found one of their a movies that i love!
The story begins when Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) finds a pickup truck surrounded by a sentry of dead men. A load of heroin and two million dollars in cash are still in the back. When Moss takes the money, he sets off a chain reaction of catastrophic violence that not even the law - in the person of aging, disillusioned Sheriff Bell (Tommy Lee-Jones) - can contain. Moss tries to evade his pursuers, in particular a mysterious Hit man ( Javier Bardem) who flips coins for human lives.
What is different from this than most of the other Coen Brothers films is the Humour - Or lack of it in this case . This is a dark , disturbing film that very rarely tries to be be funny and to be honest does not need to.
There is absolutely no music in it whatsoever , not even any backing music and that was an inspirational decision by the Coens . You hear every foot step , every heavy breath taken and and every click of a gun and it makes you feel that you are living the nightmare of everyone that has the misfortune come across the deadly Anton Chigurh .
There are brilliant displays from Tommy Lee-Jones , Josh Brolin and Kelly MacDonald but the outstanding performance must go to Javier Bardem because without that portrayal of Anton I'm not sure this would have been half the film it is.
The ending is strangely abrupt because that's the way the book ends but i feel the last scene could and should have been cut or shown earlier .
As for the nominations for Best film at the Academy Awards next month i have only seen No Country for Old Men and Atonement of the films nominated. Although i loved this film , Atonement deserves the Oscar.
8 out 10
What an ending - WHAT WHAT WHAT - i can only hope that the ending is being released separately!!!!!!!!! The ending, or lack of one, beggars belief...............
This is an incredible film. There is an undertone of tension running through it that keeps you on the edge of your seat throughout. Javier Bardem pulls off an amazing performance as the impossibly menacing and psychotic hitman and is so scarily dangerous he's practically inhuman.
The people who have reviewed here, saying that the film is boring because there's not enough action/killing, obviously missed the glaringly obvious atmosphere of impending danger that makes it so exciting, possibly because the film was a bit beyond them. Predictable killathons like Rambo 3 are probably more up their street. Anyone with half a brain will love this film.
Many fine novels buck and bridle under the constraints of movie adaptation. Others open up to the form as if it was a natural evolution, the film complimenting the book and vice versa. John... read more »
West Texas, 1980. Out hunting deer in the desert down by the Mexican border, Vietnam veteran Llewelyn Moss (Josh... read more on Time Out