The story of a man driven mad by the power of his self-contained emotion. A Shakespearean classic. Orson Welles' production began in 1948 but with money in short supply the production took a further four years to complete. An original negative found in 1992 allowed a restoration project to begin. Read more
| Starring | Orson Welles, Suzanne Cloutier, Michael MacLiammoir, Robert Coote |
|---|---|
| Director | Orson Welles |
| Genres | Drama |
loading...
The story of a man driven mad by the power of his self-contained emotion. A Shakespearean classic. Orson Welles' production began in 1948 but with money in short supply the production took a further four years to complete. An original negative found in 1992 allowed a restoration project to begin.
| Starring | Orson Welles, Suzanne Cloutier, Michael MacLiammoir, Robert Coote, Fay Compton, Michael Laurence, Doris Dowling |
|---|---|
| Director | Orson Welles |
| Studio | SECOND SIGHT FILMS LTD. |
| Run time | DVD: 1 hr 30 mins |
| Certificate | |
| Genres | Drama |
| Language | DVD: English |
| Released | DVD: 25 Aug 2003 Production year: 1952 |
| Format | DVD |
"...From Suzanne Cloutier's Desdemona to the noir-ish black-and-white photography, OTHELLO ranks with Olivier's RICHARD III and Branagh's HENRY V as the most immediate screen Bard yet..." -- 4 out of 4 stars
Welles' sixth feature (made directly after his avant-garde Macbeth) was shot in fits and starts over a period of four... read more on Time Out
This is one of the films that Orson Welles struggled for years to get made and it does show. The major pluses are the atmosphere and photography and a full-bloodied performance from Welles himself (its easy to forget that he was a great actor, as well as an innovative filmmaker). On the downside, the other performances are a very mixed bag and Shakespeare purists are likely to be horrified at the cuts that have been made to the play.
This is one of the films that Orson Welles struggled for years to get made and it does show. The major pluses are the atmosphere and photography and a full-bloodied performance from Welles himself (its easy to forget that he was a great actor, as well as an innovative filmmaker). On the downside, the other performances are a very mixed bag and Shakespeare purists are likely to be horrified at the cuts that have been made to the play.