Out For A Kill Reviews

2003

Rated:
60
from 1947 members

Archaeologist Robert Burns (Steven Seagal) has unearthed some priceless artifacts in eastern China. When he discovers that the Chinese mafia--the Tong--are using them as containers to smuggle drugs overseas, Burns is marked for death. The Tong frame him for the murder of his assistant and he is thrown in a Chinese prison--but .. Read more

Starring	Steven Seagal, Corey Johnson
Director	Michael Oblowitz
Genres	Thriller

Sign up Out For A Kill DVD

Buy From: £3.93

Most helpful members' reviews (3) of Out For A Kill
View all
5 out of 6 people found this review helpful

Very good action movie

Nice movie!! Worth to see!!
- - A customer from London
  - Posted 26 Jul 2004 17:34
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful

A good romp

Classic Steven Seagal stuff - high octane action movie which is not too demanding on the senses. The usual storyline is employed which demands you have to suspend belief in much of the plot, but what the heck, this is action entertainment from a master of the genre.
- - A customer from Birmingham, UK
  - Posted 25 Dec 2004 10:59
2 out of 4 people found this review helpful

Oh my god!

I truly believe that any reviews of a segal movie above 1 star are written by Segal himself.Because no-one with an IQ above 10 would dare to suggest that this film was good.

Segal! go away !!!!!!! your finished porky!
- - A customer from Brighton the home of common sense
  - Posted 29 Mar 2005 12:56
Most recent members' reviews (2) of Out For A Kill
View all
0 out of 3 people found this review helpful

Enjoyed this film but not has much as belly of the beast & half past dead thay are two films that must be on your view list
- - Julie#43 from BARNSLEY
  - Posted 29 Mar 2004 17:10
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful

A good romp

Classic Steven Seagal stuff - high octane action movie which is not too demanding on the senses. The usual storyline is employed which demands you have to suspend belief in much of the plot, but what the heck, this is action entertainment from a master of the genre.
- - A customer from Birmingham, UK
  - Posted 25 Dec 2004 10:59

5 out of 6 people found this review helpful

Very good action movie

Nice movie!! Worth to see!!
- - A customer from London
  - Posted 26 Jul 2004 17:34
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful

A good romp

Classic Steven Seagal stuff - high octane action movie which is not too demanding on the senses. The usual storyline is employed which demands you have to suspend belief in much of the plot, but what the heck, this is action entertainment from a master of the genre.
- - A customer from Birmingham, UK
  - Posted 25 Dec 2004 10:59
2 out of 4 people found this review helpful

Oh my god!

I truly believe that any reviews of a segal movie above 1 star are written by Segal himself.Because no-one with an IQ above 10 would dare to suggest that this film was good.

Segal! go away !!!!!!! your finished porky!
- - A customer from Brighton the home of common sense
  - Posted 29 Mar 2005 12:56
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful

Too Old!

Stevens too old now!
- - Sam from London
  - Posted 30 Mar 2005 18:05
What?!

This is the worst film that Steven Seagal has ever made. Half of the film is out of sequence with subtitles and music.
- - Susan Watson from Teignmouth, Devon
  - Posted 26 May 2005 09:40
excellent

excellent film well worth watching
- - A customer from england
  - Posted 20 Dec 2005 23:20
Unbelievable !

It's difficult to sum up everything thats bad about this film but here goes. The acting, the direction, the editing, the script, the special effects - in short everything about it sucks ! Segal has put out some pap of late but this is without a shadow of a doubt the worst i've seen. I struggled to finish watching it. The leading man gives you the impression that he almost cant be arsed to deliver his lines he is so apathetic. Perhaps he realised finally what people must have been telling him for years - go and retire - please !!!
- - Greg Brown from Peterborough, UK
  - Posted 08 Mar 2006 11:51
Rubbish!

This is the worst Seagal film I have ever seen.
- - A customer from Worthing, England
  - Posted 25 Jul 2006 20:46
Oh dear Steven..

Oh dear...I've seen all of Steven's films over the years, and this one is one of his turkies; Poor acting, poor directing and I just hate 'straight to DVD' films that use green screens, i.e. where the actors are in the studio and a moving picture is behind. Don't get me wrong, this usually works very well..but, not in this film. You have been warned..!
- - AdeClare from Kent
  - Posted 09 Oct 2005 21:06
I'm Glad I only saw it on 5...

...that way I could change the channel and avoid gagging.

For me to say a Steven Seagal film was awful is no surprise, but to say it was awful AND unwatchable is. Whatever happened to the man who gave us 'Under Seige'? The acting was subpar (for subpar standards), it seems it was all filmed in one location which served as New York/China/Budapest, and the CGI, Goodness me! a poorly CGI-ed mirror shattering inside a restaurant during a fight? What, shattering a real mirror was too expensive? The budget couldn't cover it?
- - A customer from Liverpool, England
  - Posted 02 Mar 2007 10:49