Raiders Of The Living Dead details
|Starring:||Bob Allen, Donna Asali, Scott Schwartz, Zita Johann, Robert Deveau|
|Directors:||Samuel M. Sherman, Brett Pi|
Raiders Of The Living Dead
|Run time:||1 hour 26 minutes|
|Rental release:||14 Jul 2003|
Most helpful review
Eh?By Jason McKellar from Basingstoke , 17 Mar 2005
[Highly rated reviewer]I've made some mistakes in my life but choosing this film rates up there with backing Camila as rear of the year.i struggled through the first 20 minutes hoping it would get better.terrible effects annoying music and characters although character is a strange choice for actors without any.the next 40 minutes odd were great though,i fell asleep.but unfortunately i woke up and it wasnt a dream it really was that bad.Not to be beaten i watched the rest of the film now i need councelling.I'm embarassed to have chosen it but i feel i have to write this in the hope of saving some poor soul from the same fate.beware watch at your own risk if you do watch i have the number of a good councellor.
- Was this review helpful to you?
- (4) Yes |
- No (0)
My eyes see something that I shouldn't see.By Applecore88 (4 reviews) from Peterborough , 11 Nov 2009With a poor concept, poor special effects and poor acting, Raiders of the Living Dead doesn't really have much to offer. But if you're like me and you're used to bad zombie movies then you shouldn't have a problem sitting through an hour and a half of this.
Raiders of the Living Dead does have at least one redeeming factor though, it's not often you'll find a film that boasts its own theme tune..
One piece of advice before renting; you'd better make sure you didn't mean 'Return of the Living Dead', which is a lot trashier, gorier and a hell of a lot more fun.
PLEASE KEEP AWAY FROM THIS PIECE OF SH*!By a customer from Plymouth, England , 23 Aug 2006This IS the worst film I have ever ever watched. The acting is up to the standard of a year three school play! The effects are worse than a 1980's game console and the storyline isnt any good. I can honestly say that this film has wasted an hour and 25 minutes of my life, Keep away from this.
Extremely Poor At BestBy a customer from Aberdeen, Scotland , 12 Jul 2006Avoid at all cost's this is the worst film ever I switched of after 20 mins the director should be hung for this, and the music throughout soinds like a early 70's p*rn track.
Eating my own hand would be more entertainingBy a customer from a Zombie proof bunker , 20 Jun 2006Avoid this film, I had hoped that it would be so bad it would be good Wrong. I have been more entertained cutting my fingernails. Watch a real zombie movie, not this low budget, naff plot, 80s pile of pants (soiled ones at that).
Another great bad movie!By a customer from Ipswich, UK , 27 Jan 2006I have to say that I realy like this movie, not because it's a good movie but because it's realy, realy bad! I have seen it quite a few times over the years and it always entertains me. Highlight of the film has to be the kid accidentaly shooting his hampster with a broken laserdisc player he is trying to fix, this is then turned into a weapon to use against the zombies.