Rise of the Vikings details
|Starring:||Ken Vedsegaard, Peter Gantzler, Erik Holmey|
Rise of the Vikings
|Run time:||1 hour 28 minutes|
|Rental release:||15 Jul 2013|
Most helpful review
Dirge of the VikingsBy a customer , 18 Jul 2013
[Highly rated reviewer]Don't normally submit reviews but had to for this film ~ its RUBBISH . If a film deserved zero stars it would be this one ~ put it on fast forward after about 20 mins and it was still bad . Amateur acting - poor dubbing - rank cinematography - no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Dire movie - don't bother with it.
- Was this review helpful to you?
- (5) Yes |
- No (1)
Bottom 10 filmBy a customer , 23 Nov 2013Has to be in the bottom ten films of all time. I'm only writing this review as a courtesy to others so that they don't waste their time.
Don't be misled by the titleBy MaxDoone (2 reviews) , 15 Nov 2013I had to turn it off after 10 minutes and I'm surprized it took me that long. Avoid at all costs.
Why rent it?By a customer , 12 Oct 2013I can only say this is a very slow boring film,with no connection to the characters. Poor photography. Why is it for rent?
Awful filmBy Si_A (4 reviews) , 19 Sep 2013
THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS Show review anywayHideRubbish! Don't rent it! not worth it. Cheap production and not enjoyable to watch. Battlefield scene not excited enough nor Vikings is not violent enough.
Brace yourselvesBy Korgull (23 reviews) , 21 Aug 2013I feel compelled to write a review about this B-movie as in my opinion, others who watched it and reviewed it seemed not to know much about low budget films. First of all, this film is rubbish. No doubts about it. The acting is so poor that it turns to be involuntarily quite funny and almost enjoyable at times. Battle scenes seem taken from a village reenactment along with costumes that reminded me of primary school rehearsals. Despite that, the story is just as good as any block-buster, high budget family movie (I do reckon the plot of this junk is still less predictable than other junk like 'Avatar'). Sadly, this film lacks the 'intent' and the 'passion' that drives emerging movie-makers to challenge their limitations and deliver some uniqueness in the history of cinema (B-movies lovers know what I mean by that). Bad bad bad bad stuff. However I suppose still much better than the fast and the furious (any one of those). Decent fun, if you can appreciate some thrash.