A killer lurks in the dark corners of an odd little European town--a mysterious stranger who brutally strangles his victims. When the circus comes to visit, the madman steps up his pace, commencing a ghastly murder spree. Meanwhile, a nondescript local man named Kleinman finds himself accused of the crimes by an angry mob. And .. Read more
| Starring | Woody Allen, Kathy Bates, John Cusack, Mia Farrow |
|---|---|
| Director | Woody Allen |
| Genres | Drama |
loading...
Reworking his 1972 one-act play Death, Woody Allen originally intended this esoteric drama to be a homage to German Expressionism. However, he dropped the oblique-angled sets in favour of a look owing more to Universal's pre-war horror movies and, thus, deprived an already slight premise of some visual power. As the nobody who is co-opted into the search for a strangler in an eastern European town, Allen is typically twitchy amid a galaxy of guest stars, including John Malkovich, Madonna and Jodie Foster. Short on humour, perhaps, but this curio is laced with ideas that took on a new relevance when news broke of his split with co-star Mia Farrow.
An inconclusive charade for celebrity guests, Allen's film - made before Husbands and Wives - will add to the general... read more on Time Out
"...Rich, not easily categorized....A mixture of the sincere, the sardonic and the classically sappy..."
I like Woody Allen, and I like Ingmar Bergman, but Woody trying to spoof Ingmar??? Didn't work for me - felt sorry for John Malkovitch having to deliver lines as bad as that. Mia Farrow is a pill as usual and I have no idea what John Cusack was thinking of! 2 good things in it - the famous actresses as tarts and the well poisoning joke - otherwise (as its against my principles to bail out in the middle) I just couldn't help wishing it would end so I could go and do something more interesting.
It's hard to know what Woody Allen was trying to achieve with 'Shadows and Fog'. The script is so thin, the tone so unsure and a stellar cast so completely wasted, it seems this project was only of interest as a technical exercise for Allen.
Allen plays his usual neurotic self, here named Kleinman. He's awoken in the night by a group of vigilantes who are out to catch the killer who's stalking the streets. They insist he go out and play his part, but neglect to mention what part he's meant to play. He spends the night wandering the mist-laden streets, encountering some strange characters.
'Shadows and Fog' is an appopriate title, as that's exactly what you get. Allen and his regular cinematographer Carlo Di Palma create a gorgeous homage to the expressionist films of Murnau, Lang and Dreyer, while also spoofing the works of Kafka. But that's where any interest ends.
Allen has a number of different storylines running here, and he fails to develop any of them coherently or to any sort of point. The cast is large and varied but few of them get any discernable character to work with and Allen is through with most of them in two or three scenes.
Mia Farrow, John Cusack and John Malkovich our among those who get the better end of the deal, but the likes of Lily Tomlin, Donald Pleasance, Jodie Foster and Madonna are lumbered with blink-and-you'll-miss-it roles.
Allen films usually have something to recommend them, but in 'Shadows and Fog' there's really just the handsome cinematography and nothing else. It only runs for just over 80 minutes, but feels a lot longer. Allen has made a couple of bad films in his time, but seldom has he made one so tedious.
Woody Allen does it again! A superb film. This was a very different film for Woody.
It was his first film which had a set entirely custom built.. of course, we are used to Woody pacing about the streets of Manhattan. The cinematography is brilliant, it really is all fog and shadows. Woody has never been giving credit for the artistry of his films, but this film is really noteworthy.
It has all the typical film noir/mystery trappings.. you'd be fooled for thinking this was made in the 1940's if it wasn't for Woody himself pacing around in his normal manic comedy persona. However, it works brilliantly- and the lines are as sharp and hilarious as ever.
Highly recommended. Mia Farrow is also excellent, but isn't she always?
I like Woody Allen, and I like Ingmar Bergman, but Woody trying to spoof Ingmar??? Didn't work for me - felt sorry for John Malkovitch having to deliver lines as bad as that. Mia Farrow is a pill as usual and I have no idea what John Cusack was thinking of! 2 good things in it - the famous actresses as tarts and the well poisoning joke - otherwise (as its against my principles to bail out in the middle) I just couldn't help wishing it would end so I could go and do something more interesting.
Given the quality of the actors and director this was a disappointing film. Fun to spot the filmic references for a time but it felt as though everyone, including Allen himself, was going through the motions. A far cry from his heyday.
I like Woody Allen, and I like Ingmar Bergman, but Woody trying to spoof Ingmar??? Didn't work for me - felt sorry for John Malkovitch having to deliver lines as bad as that. Mia Farrow is a pill as usual and I have no idea what John Cusack was thinking of! 2 good things in it - the famous actresses as tarts and the well poisoning joke - otherwise (as its against my principles to bail out in the middle) I just couldn't help wishing it would end so I could go and do something more interesting.
It's hard to know what Woody Allen was trying to achieve with 'Shadows and Fog'. The script is so thin, the tone so unsure and a stellar cast so completely wasted, it seems this project was only of interest as a technical exercise for Allen.
Allen plays his usual neurotic self, here named Kleinman. He's awoken in the night by a group of vigilantes who are out to catch the killer who's stalking the streets. They insist he go out and play his part, but neglect to mention what part he's meant to play. He spends the night wandering the mist-laden streets, encountering some strange characters.
'Shadows and Fog' is an appopriate title, as that's exactly what you get. Allen and his regular cinematographer Carlo Di Palma create a gorgeous homage to the expressionist films of Murnau, Lang and Dreyer, while also spoofing the works of Kafka. But that's where any interest ends.
Allen has a number of different storylines running here, and he fails to develop any of them coherently or to any sort of point. The cast is large and varied but few of them get any discernable character to work with and Allen is through with most of them in two or three scenes.
Mia Farrow, John Cusack and John Malkovich our among those who get the better end of the deal, but the likes of Lily Tomlin, Donald Pleasance, Jodie Foster and Madonna are lumbered with blink-and-you'll-miss-it roles.
Allen films usually have something to recommend them, but in 'Shadows and Fog' there's really just the handsome cinematography and nothing else. It only runs for just over 80 minutes, but feels a lot longer. Allen has made a couple of bad films in his time, but seldom has he made one so tedious.
Woody Allen does it again! A superb film. This was a very different film for Woody.
It was his first film which had a set entirely custom built.. of course, we are used to Woody pacing about the streets of Manhattan. The cinematography is brilliant, it really is all fog and shadows. Woody has never been giving credit for the artistry of his films, but this film is really noteworthy.
It has all the typical film noir/mystery trappings.. you'd be fooled for thinking this was made in the 1940's if it wasn't for Woody himself pacing around in his normal manic comedy persona. However, it works brilliantly- and the lines are as sharp and hilarious as ever.
Highly recommended. Mia Farrow is also excellent, but isn't she always?
When Woody Allen puts together an ensemble cast, there are no half measures. He also has a gift for writing parts for himself. It's an interesting piece, with the cast supporting him through the very Allenesque twists, turns and characterisations.
oh dear. Black and white film. Woody Allen in middle-aged man angst mode. A few killings in half darkness - never got to know the characters at all so didn't care who got murdered or who survived. A complete waste of time I am sorry to say and it is very rare for me to write such words in my reviews.
A weird film , but still somehow watchable ?
What a load of absolute crap. Had to turn DVD off after 15 terrible minutes, despite a good cast, this is awful.
Amazing collection of actors getting together for a rather non descript going no where in particular film. Allens angst ridden nebbish character (that he does everytime) is thrown into another scenario with same yawn factor.
Given the quality of the actors and director this was a disappointing film. Fun to spot the filmic references for a time but it felt as though everyone, including Allen himself, was going through the motions. A far cry from his heyday.
WOULD BE LOVED BY FANS OF FILM NOIR.
NOT MY CUP OF TEA.........
Reworking his 1972 one-act play Death, Woody Allen originally intended this esoteric drama to be a homage to German Expressionism. However, he dropped the oblique-angled sets in favour of a look owing more to Universal's pre-war horror movies and, thus, deprived an already slight premise of some visual power. As the nobody who is co-opted into the search for a strangler in an eastern European town, Allen is typically twitchy amid a galaxy of guest stars, including John Malkovich, Madonna and Jodie Foster. Short on humour, perhaps, but this curio is laced with ideas that took on a new relevance when news broke of his split with co-star Mia Farrow.
An inconclusive charade for celebrity guests, Allen's film - made before Husbands and Wives - will add to the general... read more on Time Out
"...Rich, not easily categorized....A mixture of the sincere, the sardonic and the classically sappy..."
An occasionally witty excursion into the world of German expressionist movies of the 20s.
"...The compassionate eloquence of the film is undeniable..."
"...A Great Cast..."