Silent Hill - Revelation details

Silent Hill - Revelation
Formats: 15 DVD, Blu-ray
Starring: Malcolm McDowell, Sean Bean, Martin Donovan, Adelaide Clemens, Kit Harington, Carrie-Anne Moss, Radha Mitchell, Deborah Kara Unger
Director: Michael J. Bassett
Genre: Horror - Thriller
Studio: ELEVATION SALES
Collections: Horrors, March - Action/Thriller
Name Discs
Silent Hill - Revelation
15 Feature

DVD Information

Run time: 1 hour 34 minutes
Rental release: 18 Mar 2013
Main languages: English
Write your own review

Most helpful review Silent Hill - Revelation

  • It could have been much, much worse

    Rated - 2.5 stars  
    By MatthewSDent (15 reviews) from Reading , 03 Nov 2012

    [Highly rated reviewer]

    The problem with adapting things like Silent Hill to cinema, is that you’re never going to get it really right. The Silent Hill games (SH2 and SH3) are some of the best horror experiences that I’ve had, and part of that is down to the immersive and claustrophobic atmosphere. It’s something which is always going to be less effective on film, and whilst I’m sure that in the minds of filmmakers 3D is meant to address that problem, it really really doesn’t.

    So whilst I sincerely hoped that Silent Hill Revelation would capture the true spirit of the games, I had mentally prepared myself for extreme disappointment.

    I think it’s for that reason that Silent Hill Revelation got off fairly lightly. It was a long way from perfect, and certainly wasn’t the Silent Hill that used to terrify and excite me in equal measures. But I left the cinema a lot happier than I had expected to be, which is about as much of a win as it’s going to get.

    Following on from the first Silent Hill film, SHR adapts the video game Silent Hill 3, and sees Heather/Sharon/Alessa/you get the idea (Adelaide Clemens) return to the eponymous town to save her father Harry/Christopher (Sean Bean), kidnapped by the creepy cultists who weren’t quite gotten rid of in the first instalment. Along the way she’s joined by Vincent (Kit “Jon Snow” Harrington), and pursued by all the traditional horrors of the franchise (and Carrie-Anne Moss).

    The names thing is a touch confusing, prompting a tongue-in-cheek admission from Heather:

    'Names don’t really matter.'

    There are some major drawbacks to the film, which seriously damage its enjoyability. Chief of these is the script. I don’t know what happened to all the horror scriptwriters who can actually write good dialogue (maybe they got really drunk at a party and annoyed everybody?), but this stuff is dreadful. There’s hardly a line which didn’t make me cringe, and the best sequences were the silent ones.

    Linked to that, there were two other points. Firstly, don’t make Sean Bean do an American accent. He can’t — it comes out as butchered Scottish. Let him do his thing in full-bodied Yorkshire, and be bloody well happy with that. Secondly, nobody does good exposition any more. I get that some people will be confused if you don’t have the characters laboriously explain everything which happens, but really? The whole scene with Harry and the mirror (not to mention the woeful conclusion speech) was unnecesary, and clunked like an old man with two wooden legs.

    Finally, the mannequin creature. Picture, if you will, General Grievous from Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith by way of the robot from I, Robot, and you have a sense of how ridiculous this was. I personally find mannequins quite scary, but this was just daft. Added to the fact that it didn’t fit with a compendium of fleshy and organic monsters, and it felt like a Lego construction squatting on the film like…well, a giant mannequin spider.

    But as I said at the start, it didn’t disappoint as much as I’d feared. Part of that was that someone had clearly actually played the games beforehand, and it was peppered with little references for fans. Pyramid Head is a long way from his original purpose, but they gave him a new one and he was at once scary and sympathetic, which is quite impressive. He’s a different beast to his one initial incarnation.

    And the end makes mentions of some of the other Silent Hill games, which is sort of nice, but also like erecting a sign saying “Look, we’re based on something!” And still nothing of the best of the lot.

    In summary, it was a distinctly average film to me. It avoided some of the potholes it could have fallen into, but only succumbed to even more obvious ones. It could have been better, but so too it could have been much, much worse. And I’d still far rather see this than yet-another-bloody Paranormal Activity film.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (15) Yes |
    •  No (7)

All reviews

(48)
  • Better than the first Silent Hill

    Rated - 3.0 stars  
    By Katelucy (15 reviews) from Leeds , 20 May 2013
    I would have to disagree with many who say this is worse than the original Silent Hill film! The story is better the acting is marginally improved with the exception of Sean Bean and the special effects are a major step forward from the first outing. I recommend you watch the first film then Revelations shortly after to help you understand the story.

    The little girl is now grown up and moving around from town to town with her father (Sean Bean) pursued by a mysterious man (Martin Donovan) who later makes himself known. This time the father is taken to Silent Hill and his daughter follows against his wishes to look for him. The rest you will have to wait and see for yourself.

    If they make a third film they should raise it to an 18 certificate and make it a lot darker, its just not very scary. Maybe I've become numb to it but really its just a bit spooky if anything.

    Adelaide Clemens (who kind of looks like Carey Mulligan) gives the best performance in this outing with Kit Harrington providing the worst acting (He's better in the Game of Thrones series). All in all its a step in the right direction but not a very memorable one, three stars (average).
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • something to try

    Rated - 3.5 stars  
    By HusaGav (1 review) , 19 May 2013

    THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS Show review anywayHide

    in comparison to the last silent hill, it was not bad, i think they've gone off on a slightly strange tangent though and changed the whole storyline from a few survivors to being a massive amount of people though and the Darkness is a very different place now. but it keeps the suspense and thats what i liked.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • dont bother....

    Rated - 2.0 stars  
    By madmummaria78 (108 reviews) , 17 May 2013
    now again, I got this film out, cause I was hoping it would be better then first one. Was I wrong? yes it wasn't that great at all personally. Not like the games :/ I wouldn't bother renting
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (1)
  • ok but no where near as good as first silenthill

    Rated - 2.5 stars  
    By a customer , 16 May 2013
    watchable but not as good as the first silenthill movie, great special effects but the plot seemed a lot weaker
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (1)
  • Don't bother

    Rated - 1.5 stars  
    By a customer , 16 May 2013
    Dreadful, disjointed, very little in the way of a plot. not a patch on the first one. Even Sean Bean was dissappointing.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (1)
 

Agree or disagree? Write your own review

Please sign in to LOVEFiLM to write your review

Sign in to LOVEFiLM

Not a member yet?

Sign up to start your 30-day FREE trial