Susan Cooper's beloved fantasy series comes to the screen with THE DARK IS RISING. A boy discovers that he possesses special powers, but his newfound abilities thrust him into a battle between good and evil. Read more
| Starring | Drew Tyler Bell, Frances Conroy, James Cosmo, Wendy Crewson |
|---|---|
| Director | David L. Cunningham |
| Genres | Action/Adventure, Family, Sci-Fi/Fantasy |
loading...
Susan Cooper's popular children's fantasy novels finally get a big screen adaptation, some 30 years after they first appeared in print. Undoubtedly the producers have an eye on the success... read more »
Another 14-year-old boy discovers the future of humanity depends on his magical powers in this over-familiar fantasy... read more on Time Out
With the approaching end of the Harry Potter franchise (assuming that JK Rowling doesn't suddenly write another book based in Hogwarts) Hollywood is definitely on the look out for the next 'Potter'. 'The Dark is Rising' is one such hopeful, being based on the second part of a five book fantasy series, that was originally published in the 1960s and 1970s.
Will Stanton is fast approaching his 14th birthday, and is struggling with the all the usual issues, not least of which is his crush on one of the older girls at school. But his life becomes far more complicated when he starts seeing strange patterns on normal objects around him and is pursued by a dark ominous figure on horseback. Demanding that Will hand over 'the signs' Will is in real danger until four of the village locals appear and chase off the figure. These individuals turn out to be time travellers, known as the 'Old Ones' and they tell Will that he is 'the Seeker', the seventh son of a seventh son, and must find six 'signs' before the Rider's power comes to it's full, otherwise darkness will sweep the lands forever.
A major problem with 'The Dark Is Rising' is that the story, though in itself interesting, is played out in such a dull and predictable way that it's hard to get a great deal of enjoyment from it. It doesn't take a great deal of thought to work out exactly what is going to happen, so when it does occur you're left with an empty, hollow feeling. Those words in fact ring true for most aspects of the film, as the acting is also 'empty' and 'hollow' more often than not. Christopher Eccleston seems to be enjoying himself, and it's nice to see Ian McShane doing something other than Deadwood but Alexander Ludwig (Will Stanton) is incredibly uncharismatic in the lead.
There were reports on this film's release that the writer of the books, Susan Cooper, was unhappy with the interpretation of her works, and seeing this it's not hard to see why. It's saving graces are few, though it's certainly far from being the worst film ever made. Some of the set pieces are very good (watch out for the security guards in the shopping centre) and overall it isn't a bad story, with some nice twists (though if you're over 8 you'll see them coming a mile away). This is worth a watch if you like fantasy films, and go into it without expectations. But don't expect the next Harry Potter - Hollywood's still working on that one.
Expected something vaguely adventurous, but just found it boring and predictacle. Avoid it if want to see something at least interesting.
Our two children enjoyed this film. It was very enjoyable.
I really wish I had read some of the reviews of this film before watching it. As a fan of the books I was very excited when the Dark is Rising was made into a film and then wondered why it fell of the radar like a lead balloon. Now I know why.
Not only was the original story line completely messed with (from the lead characters nationality and age, to the completely fabricated feel good ending) but the acting was extremely wooden and unconvincing. Surprising considering the casting of Christopher Eccleston and Ian McShane, but then they can only work with the script they are given. A typical Hollywood hatchet job, turning an English lead character into an American to make it more accessible to US audiences and portraying the Brit characters as hackney stereotypes. It gets 1 star for the CGI only.
With the approaching end of the Harry Potter franchise (assuming that JK Rowling doesn't suddenly write another book based in Hogwarts) Hollywood is definitely on the look out for the next 'Potter'. 'The Dark is Rising' is one such hopeful, being based on the second part of a five book fantasy series, that was originally published in the 1960s and 1970s.
Will Stanton is fast approaching his 14th birthday, and is struggling with the all the usual issues, not least of which is his crush on one of the older girls at school. But his life becomes far more complicated when he starts seeing strange patterns on normal objects around him and is pursued by a dark ominous figure on horseback. Demanding that Will hand over 'the signs' Will is in real danger until four of the village locals appear and chase off the figure. These individuals turn out to be time travellers, known as the 'Old Ones' and they tell Will that he is 'the Seeker', the seventh son of a seventh son, and must find six 'signs' before the Rider's power comes to it's full, otherwise darkness will sweep the lands forever.
A major problem with 'The Dark Is Rising' is that the story, though in itself interesting, is played out in such a dull and predictable way that it's hard to get a great deal of enjoyment from it. It doesn't take a great deal of thought to work out exactly what is going to happen, so when it does occur you're left with an empty, hollow feeling. Those words in fact ring true for most aspects of the film, as the acting is also 'empty' and 'hollow' more often than not. Christopher Eccleston seems to be enjoying himself, and it's nice to see Ian McShane doing something other than Deadwood but Alexander Ludwig (Will Stanton) is incredibly uncharismatic in the lead.
There were reports on this film's release that the writer of the books, Susan Cooper, was unhappy with the interpretation of her works, and seeing this it's not hard to see why. It's saving graces are few, though it's certainly far from being the worst film ever made. Some of the set pieces are very good (watch out for the security guards in the shopping centre) and overall it isn't a bad story, with some nice twists (though if you're over 8 you'll see them coming a mile away). This is worth a watch if you like fantasy films, and go into it without expectations. But don't expect the next Harry Potter - Hollywood's still working on that one.
Expected something vaguely adventurous, but just found it boring and predictacle. Avoid it if want to see something at least interesting.
I didn't quite know what to expect when I went to see this, but I quite enjoyed it. It wasn't anything special: the age old story of the fight against light (good) and darkness(evil) with a bit of a twist this time round. For novelty purposes, this is a good watch...
Susan Cooper's books are brilliant and I suppose that this utter travesty of an adaptation now means that they will never be filmed as they should have been.
There is not enough room on this website to describe how rubbish this film was, although the other negative reviews have touched on many of the things which made it offensively bad, I'll mention some specially low points anyway - the trading with pillaging vikings, the total lack of ability on the part of the leads, the dysfunctional American family, the almost total omission of the British mythological backdrop, the gothicisation of Amersham (!), the throwaway witch scene, the fast and efficient retrieval of 'signs' lost for centuries without breaking sweat etc.etc.etc A film made by idiots for idiots. I hope the people who perpetrated this lost their shirts, and Christopher Ecclestone should be dee[y ashamed of participating in this garbage, there was more artistic integrity to be found playing piano in a strip joint.
It should be illegal to rent this.
With a former Dr Who as the baddie and Lovejoy as a goodie, this has the feel of a BBC Sunday evening drama - some good effects and nice performances all round, it looks like this will be a stand alone film as opposed to the francise it potentially could have been. As it's a 12 it may be a bit too scary for younger children and don't rent if you're afraid of birds.
God this was awful. I read the book a long time ago and enjoyed it. It's set in England or possibly Wales and they've located it in Amersham with American children and all the left over CGI they could get hold of - horse from Lord of the Rings, snakes from Raiders of the lost ark and morphing birds and animals from absolutely everywhere. The quest for the signs was risible, acting dire, characterisation negligable and the plot made very little sense. Read the book, it's better.
As a huge fan of the fantasy gene I feel a little derelict in my duty by not having read any of the The Dark Is Rising series of books by Susan Cooper. From reading numerous review of this film from people who have read the books , and are fans, it is clear that the producers, directors and the writer who adapted this for the big screen ( John Hodge who admits to not being a fan of the fantasy genre. He obviously took the job for the money but why didnt anyone realise this and fire his arse?) have made a complete hash of the job. On most levels this is a poor move, but at least it could have been exciting and good fun but it commits the most cardinal sin of all
.being interminably dull.
Will Stanton (Alexander Ludwig) is a 14 year old American( In the book he was English so why the change? To appeal to the U.S. market or distance him from a certain other young bespectacled English schoolboy?) boy living in an English village (The film was actually shot in Rumania which will be why I was constantly confused about where it was set as it looked nothing like an English village) He feels somewhat cut off from his large extended family -almost literally as he has to sleep in the crumbling attic -and has a serious crush on the older Maggie (Amelia Warner) To add to this he has started to have strange visions involving a certain repeated pattern .
Suddenly some of the eccentric locals Merriman Lyon ( Ian McShane) and Miss Greythorne( Frances Conroy) inform him he is The Seeker who must find the six signs that will ensure that the light will win over the dark again .Very important this because the dark , represented by Christopher Eccleston wearing a feathery cape on horseback, is rising up again to plunge the world into eternal darkness as the dark is wont to do . Or something like that. Happily he, Will , has some powers to help him achieve this end including time travel (useful), Pyrotechnics(Fairly useful but wears out if he uses it too much so not that useful after all) and the ability to give others a ruddy good shove ( Not so useful unless you want to give someone a ruddy good shove)
The whole film is an arbitrarily assigned hotch potch of fantasy elements that never gels into a cohesive narrative. There are a couple of twists that anybody who hasnt nodded off after the first five minutes, and be aware there is a good chance this may happen , will see coming as if they had ridden across the screen wearing a feathery cape. The film is jam-packed with extraneous fantasy window dressing -ravens, dogs that growl at Will , menacing figures that might be beasties but all these never add up to anything substantial .
Worse of all , after all this the concluding confrontation between light and dark is nothing more than lots of shouting (The Duke Of Wellington from Blackadder III would love it) and some swirling black clouds. A sub-plot involving a missing twin brother is shoe-horned in for added poignancy.
The acting is competent enough but its hard to escape the feeling that prodigious talents like Eccleston and McShane are wasted but then again the whole movie is one big wasted opportunity . Why decide to make a fantasy and then be so half hearted about ? And why adapt much loved books and completely ignore what is was that made them so loved in the first place.? No wonder Susan Cooper is so disgruntled with this movie. Shes not the only one . The Dark is indeed rising
.in the hearts and minds of studio executive who let tripe like this come into being .
NOT QUITE WHAT WE WERE EXPECTING. A BIT DARK FOR CHILDREN & A BIT LONG & SLOW FOR ADULTS.
Our two children enjoyed this film. It was very enjoyable.
Susan Cooper's popular children's fantasy novels finally get a big screen adaptation, some 30 years after they first appeared in print. Undoubtedly the producers have an eye on the success... read more »
Another 14-year-old boy discovers the future of humanity depends on his magical powers in this over-familiar fantasy... read more on Time Out