With THE EXORCIST, William Friedkin (THE FRENCH CONNECTION, THE BOYS IN THE BAND) rivals Hitchcock for heart-stopping terror in this deeply horrifyingmasterpiece that led to religious boycotts, fainting and nauseous audiences, and a commercial success that forever changed Hollywood. Linda Blair plays Regan, a 12-year-old girl .. Read more
| Starring | Ellen Burstyn, Linda Blair, Jason Miller, Max von Sydow |
|---|---|
| Director | William Friedkin |
| Genres | Horror |
loading...
William Peter Blatty's Oscar-winning adaptation of his own bestselling novel about the demonic possession of an actress's young daughter is one of the most talked-about and reviled horror movies of all time. Unbelievably scary when it first came out, its overall impact has been lessened by time and repeated genre duplication. But the macabre, obscene demonstrations of manifest evil still retain their power to startle and nauseate, particularly Linda Blair's head-turning antics as the possessed child. Aside from the graphic and revolutionary special effects, director William Friedkin dwells on the allegorical religious subtleties, making this a richly satisfying experience for horror aficionados. Max von Sydow (as the priest at the centre of the exorcism) and Ellen Burstyn (as the girl's mother) also rise to the landmark occasion, and special mention should go to Robert Knudson and Chris Newman, whose marvellous use of sound won the film's second Oscar.
Spectacularly ludicrous mishmash with uncomfortable attention to physical detail and no talent for narrative or verisimilitude. Its sensational aspects, together with a sudden worldwide need for the supernatural, assured its enormous commercial success.
"...The first modern, F/X-heavy shriek-o-rama....[Miller and Burstyn] give harrowing, nuanced performances....Strikingly new amid [its era]..."
Touted as The Scariest Horror film ever, the Exorcist is still head and shoulders above nearly all modern horror films.
A young girl develops an alternate destructive personality, and is slowly consumed by the new presence. With the finest doctors in America unable to cure her, her rich mother turns to the church for an Exorcism. This is a gripping story of a child at the mercy of a demon, with only a priest (and psychologist) who is losing his faith in God, as her only defence. Although some of the special effects may seem a little dated now, the overall story is still as frightening as ever.
If you are scared of possesions and the supernatural rather than blood and gore, then this film is the scariest film ever made! After 30 years of release, the film is still very much in the top 3 of horrors. Indeed, part of the horror is the fact that it is based on a true story that took place in St Louis in 1949. Brilliantly executed, The Exorcist is an example to follow for the supernatural horror genre. Horror is not created while watching the film, rather the effect that is left after you have seen it; it will haunt you for a very long time!
BOOM FOR THE PRINCE OF DARKNESS! Never before were so many movies produced dealing with the devil as the last years. Arnold Schwarzenegger fought in 'End of Days' the Satan, Johnny Depp opened in Roman Polanski's 'the nine gates' the door to hell and Kim Basinger was confrontated in 'The prophecy' with the power of darkness. But what would theses films be without the classicist 'The Excorcist'? In the year 1973 spectators were so shocked that many of them left the theatres before the film finished. And now the Thriller returns as 'Director's Cut'.
But the story is still the same:
Regan (Linda Blair) is a friendy 12-year-old girl who lives with her famous mother Chris MacNeil (Ellen Burstyn) in a small house. One day Chris realises strange changes on her daughter. She is depressed, feels weak but the doctors cannot recognise any diseases. As Regan's bed was shaken like from a ghost the mother believes that there are supernatural powers. She seeks for assistance by church and parson Karras(Jason Miller) who supposes at once that Regan is possed by the devil. Only one man can help her: The Excorcist who is parson Merrin (Max von Sydow) and who stands in front of her house very soon...
Touted as The Scariest Horror film ever, the Exorcist is still head and shoulders above nearly all modern horror films.
A young girl develops an alternate destructive personality, and is slowly consumed by the new presence. With the finest doctors in America unable to cure her, her rich mother turns to the church for an Exorcism. This is a gripping story of a child at the mercy of a demon, with only a priest (and psychologist) who is losing his faith in God, as her only defence. Although some of the special effects may seem a little dated now, the overall story is still as frightening as ever.
Some of my friends think its a joke. I saw it at the cinema once and there were some people laughing during the scarier scenes. Some say its dated, some that its slow paced but its this pace that slowly shreads your nerves and leads to the most terrifying finale in cinema history.
I have never come close to actually wanting to get up and leave a cinema because I was so uncomfortable.
The director takes you from long, almost silent scenes in eerie churches or parks cutting, without warning, to noisey excavation sites in the desert always un-nerving you, keeping you on edge, never letting you relax.
The flashing candle scene in the attic a sign of things to come.
A classic that doesnt rely on special effects, although Linda's impossbly spasming body is so realistic, like a monster thunder storm looming as a child counts the decreasing miles after the lightning.
Touted as The Scariest Horror film ever, the Exorcist is still head and shoulders above nearly all modern horror films.
A young girl develops an alternate destructive personality, and is slowly consumed by the new presence. With the finest doctors in America unable to cure her, her rich mother turns to the church for an Exorcism. This is a gripping story of a child at the mercy of a demon, with only a priest (and psychologist) who is losing his faith in God, as her only defence. Although some of the special effects may seem a little dated now, the overall story is still as frightening as ever.
If you are scared of possesions and the supernatural rather than blood and gore, then this film is the scariest film ever made! After 30 years of release, the film is still very much in the top 3 of horrors. Indeed, part of the horror is the fact that it is based on a true story that took place in St Louis in 1949. Brilliantly executed, The Exorcist is an example to follow for the supernatural horror genre. Horror is not created while watching the film, rather the effect that is left after you have seen it; it will haunt you for a very long time!
BOOM FOR THE PRINCE OF DARKNESS! Never before were so many movies produced dealing with the devil as the last years. Arnold Schwarzenegger fought in 'End of Days' the Satan, Johnny Depp opened in Roman Polanski's 'the nine gates' the door to hell and Kim Basinger was confrontated in 'The prophecy' with the power of darkness. But what would theses films be without the classicist 'The Excorcist'? In the year 1973 spectators were so shocked that many of them left the theatres before the film finished. And now the Thriller returns as 'Director's Cut'.
But the story is still the same:
Regan (Linda Blair) is a friendy 12-year-old girl who lives with her famous mother Chris MacNeil (Ellen Burstyn) in a small house. One day Chris realises strange changes on her daughter. She is depressed, feels weak but the doctors cannot recognise any diseases. As Regan's bed was shaken like from a ghost the mother believes that there are supernatural powers. She seeks for assistance by church and parson Karras(Jason Miller) who supposes at once that Regan is possed by the devil. Only one man can help her: The Excorcist who is parson Merrin (Max von Sydow) and who stands in front of her house very soon...
a great horror film this, most horror films do not live up to their own hype, trying to add blood and gore to it instead of getting a good storyline, good actors and a good director....watched this and then wandered into a bloody cold bedroom...nope, not possessed, heating wasn't working....honest!!
I have heard so much about this film and was very excited about watching it.
But i found myself waiting for somethin scary to happen and it never did.
The graphics were rubbish and quite laughable! The little girl just looks so unreal. It didnt have much a a story line and the sound quailty was rubbish. A really hyped up film which i personally thought wass absolutly rubish!
I am tired of seeing bad reviews for this film saying that it's overrated. The effects in this film are pretty good for the year it was made- 1973, the storyline is excellent and really shocks the audience by turning a sweet little girl into a monster.
I, myself was not at all frightened by this movie but I can see why many people of faith, especially Christians, would be. If the film doesn't scare you, there's always the comic value of a young girl shouting obscenities and slapping people randomly.
I was really excited about watching this, with it promising the infamous spider walk, and over 10 minutes extra footage. Unfortunately apart from the spider walk all this did was slow down the pace of the film, and give unsubtle hints of what was about to happen next. None of the extra footage was of any particular interest and in my view deserved to be cut out. Do yourself a favour watch the original.
How the hell can this film be known as one of the scariest films out there?!?!... I remember me and my friends watching this when we was about 12 years old thinking it was a comedy..
The effects are crap.. its boring, its drags on.. its just sooooo crap.
This film is SERIOUSLY NOT SCARY. ITS MORE FUNNY.. imagine shaun of the dead?? thats a funny horror.. exorcist is the same.
I have a theory that any hype about the film being banned/causing people to go mad/ having demons imbeded in the negative was done toactually blunt any scary edge that the film ever had. It was wholly disapointing with too many effects and jumpy bits to be considered a drama/thriller and not enough scary bits to be a horror.
The drab autumnal feel of the film try to make this a 'could happen anywhere any time' feeling but just seem to emphasis the sparseness of the story.
Sorry but i dont see this film as the classic that it has been made out to be.
William Peter Blatty's Oscar-winning adaptation of his own bestselling novel about the demonic possession of an actress's young daughter is one of the most talked-about and reviled horror movies of all time. Unbelievably scary when it first came out, its overall impact has been lessened by time and repeated genre duplication. But the macabre, obscene demonstrations of manifest evil still retain their power to startle and nauseate, particularly Linda Blair's head-turning antics as the possessed child. Aside from the graphic and revolutionary special effects, director William Friedkin dwells on the allegorical religious subtleties, making this a richly satisfying experience for horror aficionados. Max von Sydow (as the priest at the centre of the exorcism) and Ellen Burstyn (as the girl's mother) also rise to the landmark occasion, and special mention should go to Robert Knudson and Chris Newman, whose marvellous use of sound won the film's second Oscar.
Spectacularly ludicrous mishmash with uncomfortable attention to physical detail and no talent for narrative or verisimilitude. Its sensational aspects, together with a sudden worldwide need for the supernatural, assured its enormous commercial success.
"...The first modern, F/X-heavy shriek-o-rama....[Miller and Burstyn] give harrowing, nuanced performances....Strikingly new amid [its era]..."
Friedkin's film about the possession of a 12-year-old girl works as an essay in suspension of disbelief and on the... read more on Time Out