In a parallel universe, young Lyra Belacqua journeys to the far North to save her best friend and other kidnapped children from terrible experiments by a mysterious organization. Read more
| Starring | Dakota Blue Richards, Nicole Kidman, Daniel Craig, Eva Green |
|---|---|
| Director | Chris Weitz |
| Genres | Action/Adventure, Family, Sci-Fi/Fantasy |
loading...
"I wish I had a daemon," my son said to me, after we finished chapter five. I said I knew how he felt; it's hard to imagine anyone reading Philip Pullman's "The Northern Lights" and not... read more »
Bland, bloodless and bereft of magic, New Lines corporate sanitisation of Philip Pullmans exciting, provocative... read more on Time Out
The movie is a let down on all the levels. Excruciatingly boring, I was fighting desire to sleep, very slow and the plot doesn't make any sense.
And the worst of it, noone ever tells you that the movie is not completed, so that you would have to come again to pay again to see the end of this nonsense. After 2 hours of boredom they don't even tell you what the 'dust' is.
What a joke! Movie makers don't have any respect for audience any more. Anything would do to get money.
this mvoie is allrihtg
I got into Philip Pullman's 'His Dark Materials' book trilogy in my 30s, and absolutely loved them. They are page-turners in the best tradition of Harry Potter, with as much imaginative depth, but far more adult themes to enjoy. In Pullman's fantasy world(s?), there are parallel universes containing hitherto unknown Oxford colleges, bears who make their own armour, and a fresh take on the millennia-old religious conflicts that have bedevilled Western societies.
Golden Compass is the film of (most of) the first book of the trilogy. At first glance, there are obvious similarities to Potter. The key character, Lyra (Dakota Richards), is an orphan, being raised amidst the dreamy spires of Oxford (shot beautifully). There are witches aplenty, who appear to be 'good' so far as we can tell. But Potter doesn't have the religious overtones, which while a bit muted in contrast with the book (or even Elizabeth: Golden Age) are still effective here, with strong supporting roles for Derek Jacobi and Christopher Lee.
Fans of the books will find much to enjoy. Film and CGI are made for the daemons, the animals which accompany all people as the projection of their soul and which are an integral part of Golden Compasses' plot. The airships, lifting off from Oxford and landing in a parallel universe London, are terrific. The Magisterium's set was jaw-dropping. And Lord Asriel (Daniel Craig) and Mrs Coulter (Nicole Kidman) are both utterly faithful to their leadership roles in the books.
The problem for this film will be the inevitable comparisons to Harry Potter, Chronicles of Narnia and to the epic Lord of the Rings. I felt the film held up well against Potter; Dakota Richard's Lyra is effective and the richness of the imagination of the book comes out strongly, with a rip-roaring pace that echoes the page-turning additiveness of the book. But with more for adults. I also enjoyed this more than Narnia, which I had felt was fine for kids and reasonably faithful to the books but left a bit to be desired for adults who probably last read the books 30+ years ago.
But where the comparison will pale is with Lord of the Rings (LOTR). LOTR's execution was so flawless that Golden Compass looks a bit rickety and gimmicky in comparison. The bears didn't quite work for me, especially when running. The dramatic battle scenes served only to remind me how wonderful LOTR's climactic battles were. The Gyptians and Witches are no match for the Orcs and Goblins or Ents. While I know many (particularly women like my wife, who loved Golden Compass) will disagree, I felt that LOTR's position at the top of podium is safe for many years yet. But Golden Compass has done very well to even be compared in the same paragraph and the prospect of the (not yet confirmed) sequel and trequel is making my mouth water already.
Ah, what a shame - a film that could have been spectacular if it had been a mere 30 minutes longer and allowed for a bit of character development. It looks astonishing, capturing the visual spirit of Pullman's book perfectly, but it lacks the heart of the book. The actors all do their level best but the story whips by at such a rate that one is left feeling unconcerned by all their interactions and the rationale.
It does not help that certain key scenes have been swapped around or chopped entirely - unlike Lord of the Rings, which could stand some heavy chopping, Northern Lights is too subtle to cope with it. All that is left, after the meat has been cut from the book, is a pretty-looking action film with some fine acting, and a script that leaves ever such a lot to be desired...
Not being particularly fond of Pullman's books (finding them rather pompous) I was watching The Golden Compass not as a fan hoping to be blown away, but as a cynic hoping that the film version might have translated Pullman's leaden story into a more compact and accessible experience.
My scepticism was well founded, however. The film is awful, disorganised, dull, rushed and confusing. The much-vaunted special effects do not justify their hype, being unconvincing and cartoon-like. The neat concept of each person having his own animal daemon is fatally undermined by the fact that the daemons are always poorly computer generated and never played by real animals, even for the bits when they are doing something uncomplicated like sitting still. The animation is OK at best but still looks like it would be more at home in a BBC saturday night drama like Doctor Who than a high budget film. Sadly the daemons represent the best of the effects on offer here, with the horribly unconvincing city vistas and airship travel rendered in such a poor way as to be totally embarassing, and shattering any possible chance of creating that magical lifelike illusion that effects must deliver to justify their inclusion.
A great plot, characters and drama might have gone some way to making up for all of this, but in these departments too the film is also sorely lacking, the characters never getting enough screen time to justify their presence, and the actual plot being almost impossible to find at all.
While many of the fans of the book will probably be let down, I carried no expectations and still found this film to be nothing more than a succession of disconnected scenes and dialogue with no compelling reason whatsoever to keep me watching to the end - I turned it off three quarters of the way through rather than waste more of my life watching it.
The movie is a let down on all the levels. Excruciatingly boring, I was fighting desire to sleep, very slow and the plot doesn't make any sense.
And the worst of it, noone ever tells you that the movie is not completed, so that you would have to come again to pay again to see the end of this nonsense. After 2 hours of boredom they don't even tell you what the 'dust' is.
What a joke! Movie makers don't have any respect for audience any more. Anything would do to get money.
this mvoie is allrihtg
I got into Philip Pullman's 'His Dark Materials' book trilogy in my 30s, and absolutely loved them. They are page-turners in the best tradition of Harry Potter, with as much imaginative depth, but far more adult themes to enjoy. In Pullman's fantasy world(s?), there are parallel universes containing hitherto unknown Oxford colleges, bears who make their own armour, and a fresh take on the millennia-old religious conflicts that have bedevilled Western societies.
Golden Compass is the film of (most of) the first book of the trilogy. At first glance, there are obvious similarities to Potter. The key character, Lyra (Dakota Richards), is an orphan, being raised amidst the dreamy spires of Oxford (shot beautifully). There are witches aplenty, who appear to be 'good' so far as we can tell. But Potter doesn't have the religious overtones, which while a bit muted in contrast with the book (or even Elizabeth: Golden Age) are still effective here, with strong supporting roles for Derek Jacobi and Christopher Lee.
Fans of the books will find much to enjoy. Film and CGI are made for the daemons, the animals which accompany all people as the projection of their soul and which are an integral part of Golden Compasses' plot. The airships, lifting off from Oxford and landing in a parallel universe London, are terrific. The Magisterium's set was jaw-dropping. And Lord Asriel (Daniel Craig) and Mrs Coulter (Nicole Kidman) are both utterly faithful to their leadership roles in the books.
The problem for this film will be the inevitable comparisons to Harry Potter, Chronicles of Narnia and to the epic Lord of the Rings. I felt the film held up well against Potter; Dakota Richard's Lyra is effective and the richness of the imagination of the book comes out strongly, with a rip-roaring pace that echoes the page-turning additiveness of the book. But with more for adults. I also enjoyed this more than Narnia, which I had felt was fine for kids and reasonably faithful to the books but left a bit to be desired for adults who probably last read the books 30+ years ago.
But where the comparison will pale is with Lord of the Rings (LOTR). LOTR's execution was so flawless that Golden Compass looks a bit rickety and gimmicky in comparison. The bears didn't quite work for me, especially when running. The dramatic battle scenes served only to remind me how wonderful LOTR's climactic battles were. The Gyptians and Witches are no match for the Orcs and Goblins or Ents. While I know many (particularly women like my wife, who loved Golden Compass) will disagree, I felt that LOTR's position at the top of podium is safe for many years yet. But Golden Compass has done very well to even be compared in the same paragraph and the prospect of the (not yet confirmed) sequel and trequel is making my mouth water already.
Having read the books and thoroughly enjoyed them I was looking forward to watching the Golden Compass. However I was extremely disappointed. The film never really develops any of the central themes of the trilogy (notably the central theme of religion), it does not develop any of the characters to a sufficient level, and it does not capture the beauty of the relationship between a human and its daemon. Instead from the start the film races through the different events in the book, and in doing so loses all of its magic.
This film may be enjoyed by young children because of the visual effects... but for older viewers it is a disappointment all round.
To sum up the book has been converted into nothing more than a poor fantasy film!
This is stylish and well-shot and the cast is good. BUT I do not get how any sane parent would allow their kids to watch something that thinks demons are good and to be encouraged and sought out by their kids - unless they are satanists?
A crushing disappointment for fans and a scuppered opportunity for a cinematic event. That the first book has been so mishandled doesnt bode well for the (already greenlit) more complicated ones to come.
Ah, what a shame - a film that could have been spectacular if it had been a mere 30 minutes longer and allowed for a bit of character development. It looks astonishing, capturing the visual spirit of Pullman's book perfectly, but it lacks the heart of the book. The actors all do their level best but the story whips by at such a rate that one is left feeling unconcerned by all their interactions and the rationale.
It does not help that certain key scenes have been swapped around or chopped entirely - unlike Lord of the Rings, which could stand some heavy chopping, Northern Lights is too subtle to cope with it. All that is left, after the meat has been cut from the book, is a pretty-looking action film with some fine acting, and a script that leaves ever such a lot to be desired...
The film of the first novel in Pullmans Dark Materials trilogy, and I have to admit it was a compass that lost it's way a bit, as the effects are excellent but just about everything else in parts let it down, from the slightly uninspired and predictable storyline to some fairly average performances from (some of) the cast that don't add to the novels very weirdly and inaptly named characters and places. It is good, but it just is never magical and mesmerising as say Narnia is, and it is noticeable. I would not miss seeing it, as it is definately worth a watch, it just has a slight lack of gloss that others in this genre have in spades.
"I wish I had a daemon," my son said to me, after we finished chapter five. I said I knew how he felt; it's hard to imagine anyone reading Philip Pullman's "The Northern Lights" and not... read more »
Bland, bloodless and bereft of magic, New Lines corporate sanitisation of Philip Pullmans exciting, provocative... read more on Time Out