The Lord Of The Rings - The Fellowship Of The Ring - Extended Version details

The Lord Of The Rings - The Fellowship Of The Ring - Extended Version
Formats: PG DVD, Blu-ray
Starring: Elijah Wood, Ian Holm, Sean Bean, Orlando Bloom, Cate Blanchett, Ian McKellen, Viggo Mortensen, Sean Astin, Billy Boyd
Director: Peter Jackson
Genres: Action/Adventure - Epic, Sci-Fi/Fantasy - Fantasy - General
Studio: ENTERTAINMENT IN VIDEO
Collections: Best of the Decade, Book Adaptations
Name Discs
The Lord Of The Rings - The Fellowship Of The Ring - Extended Version
PG Feature
The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring - Bonus Disc 1
TBC Bonus
The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring - Bonus Disc 2
TBC Bonus

DVD Information

Run time: 2 hours 51 minutes
Rental release: 12 Nov 2002
Main languages: English
Subtitles: English
Write your own review

Most helpful review The Lord Of The Rings - The Fellowship Of The Ring - Extended Version

  • EXTRA SCENES MAKE THIS A DIFFERENT MOVIE TO THE CINEMA VERSION

    Rated - 5.0 stars  
    By Carl Hunt from Isle of Wight , 12 Aug 2005

    [Highly rated reviewer]

    In my opinion this is quite simply the best story ever told and i'm glad to say I've never even read the books...why would I want to when the films have been so utterly enjoyable.

    The characters is the extended versions are (particularly in the fellowship) presented more and little side stories and humour add even more magic.

    If you've seen the originals and think that this isn't going to be worth watching, think again. You're talking about an extra 20 minutes to each of the first two films and about an extra 30 minutes to ROTK to make sheer imiginative brilliance.

    An easy 5 stars from a realistic reviewer.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (26) Yes |
    •  No (7)

All reviews

(74)
  • Two towers

    Rated - 5.0 stars  
    By a customer , 10 May 2012
    Superb series. Looking forward to the hobbit. Well worth watching the extended series if you have enjoyed the cinema version.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (1) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • good but not the best

    Rated - 3.5 stars  
    By denis007 (133 reviews) , 08 Apr 2012
    The story is good but not exceptional as some readers want to make it look like. Lots of special effects, beautiful outdoors of New Zealand, action packed movie but it is way too long. The movie I heard is very close to the book but it will never be as good as the source, the book that is! Still it is watchable and it gives you a nice warm feeling inside, especially at night when it is rainy and cold.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • roll over harry potter

    Rated - 5.0 stars  
    By cheesekake (1283 reviews) from uk , 04 Mar 2012
    tolkien's book was brought to 1st class life by this amazing film, with the most incredible graphics, long it may be but it makes the darkest harry potter look like Alvin and the Chipmunks
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • a good film to watch

    Rated - 3.5 stars  
    By actor (232 reviews) from Basingstoke , 05 Jul 2011
    i realy do like this film it has got a realy good story to it and it has got some good action scenes with a good long advenger yes long this is a verry loing film i think its on for 2 hoars 47 minits what is long but good some people think it is hard to under stand but i dont think it is is think its normal realy not hard ok.

    but i can say i think this shord b a 12 because when i was little this film use to scere me lol so yep i think think it shord b a 12 just like the last 2 what r 12 dont c much difrents in them.

    i realy did enjoy this film and it is a realy famous film alot of people give it 5 out of 5 so yep its good but i give it 3 haf out of 5 lol greate film some think what u must c if u havent seen it ;).

    With THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING, director Peter Jackson has achieved a meticulous and captivating adaptation of the first book of J.R.R. Tolkien's classic fantasy trilogy. The setting is Middle-earth, a mythological land populated by elves, dwarves, humans, and the gentle, diminutive hobbits upon whom the story centers. One hobbit, Frodo Baggins (Elijah Wood), unexpectedly comes into possession of an ancient magical ring so powerful it invariably corrupts anyone who wears it. In order to prevent the ring's erstwhile owner, the dark lord Sauron, from reclaiming the ring and taking over Middle-earth, a motley band of comrades set out to destroy it in the fires of Mount Doom, where it was forged. Included in the group are Frodo and hobbits Sam (Sean Astin), Merry (Dominic Monoghan), and Pippin (Billy Boyd); the wizard Gandalf (Ian McKellen); human warriors Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen) and Boromir (Sean Bean); the dwarf Gimli (John Rhys-Davies); the elf Legolas (Orlando Bloom). Along the way, they wage battle with monsters, demons, and Sauron's evil minions, all brought to life by spectacular digital technology.

    Jackson's grandiose production represents the first of three films that he wrote and directed, derived from Tolkien's beloved novels. Fourteen months in the making, at a cost of $270 million, all three installments were filmed at once in New Zealand where diverse landscapes lend themselves particularly well to the mystical realm of Middle-earth. The story continues with THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE TWO TOWERS and THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RETURN OF THE KING.

    .
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (3)
  • A fantastic movie based on a genre-defining book. See it.

    Rated - 5.0 stars  
    By a customer , 23 Jun 2011
    There's a reason that the LoR movies are so great - the underlying books are not only filled with depth, but they are quite literally genre-defining. Its no understatement to say that there wasn't really a well defined 'Fantasy' genre until LoR came along.

    I'm a believer in the theory that at the centre of every genre, no matter how exhausted, there is something of excellence, be it hip-hop, rap, opera, westerns, rom-coms or whatever. Well when it comes to 'fantasy' LoR is it. Even if you've never read the book and are not a fan of 'fantasy' you should see the film. You remember how 'Star Wars' entranced you as a child ? Well LoR is just as significant, and because of the quality of the source material, built on much deeper foundations.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
 

Agree or disagree? Write your own review

Please sign in to LOVEFiLM to write your review

Sign in to LOVEFiLM

Not a member yet?

Sign up to start your 30-day FREE trial