Name Discs
The Wolfman
15 Feature

DVD Information

Run time: 1 hour 38 minutes
Rental release: 07 Jun 2010
Main languages: English
Write your own review

Most helpful review The Wolfman

  • The Wolfman

    Rated - 1.0 star  
    By a customer , 23 Aug 2010

    [Highly rated reviewer]

    AGREED...WHY CAN WE NOT RENT THIS TITLE?...IT'S A MAJOR RELEASE FOR GOODNESS SAKE!....QUITE A LET DOWN REALLY!...PLEASE TRY AND RECTIFY...MAY THANKS.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (59) Yes |
    •  No (13)

All reviews

(60)
  • Not quite grand enough guignol

    Rated - 2.5 stars  
    By Appleford (14 reviews) , 04 Apr 2013
    A slice (or should that be slash?) of Victorian gothic done fairly straight (surprisingly and thankfully) though not ducking the 21stC requirement for lots of explicit gore, literally visceral at times. There is plenty of mumbo-jumbo too: largely unintelligible mysticism from the Gypsies and lots of lowering talk of curses and demons from the locals. Many other cliches of the genre are trotted out: howlings to make you cringe and abrupt noises to make you jump. The gothic atmosphere if well achieved by clever sets and impressive CGI. The transformations from man to wolf are excellent technically, but it's a shame that the facial end result leaves the werewolves looking like something out of Cats. The locals (a troupe of stalwart British character actors) have the worst of the script, as they plough and plod through some cliched scenes, but the main players are quite well served in terms of melodrama and action. There's a quite satisfying liebestod at the end, though I won't say who's loving and who's dying, not that the rather predictable outcome warrants any spoiler alert.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • Good but not as good as the original

    Rated - 3.0 stars  
    By a customer , 11 Feb 2013
    Ok this movie is ok but do not expect the original, the werewolf is by far the best we have seen in a while but the transformation scenes are ruined by overdoing the cgi, the original is by far the best especially when you feel a connection with Lawrence talbot because you feel sorry for him and this is what lets the remake down, you don't feel sorry for him and they completely messed up the father character but hey what can you do just expect a story that's completely different to the original
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • Okay ish!

    Rated - 2.5 stars  
    By Frenske (6 reviews) , 08 Feb 2013

    [Highly rated reviewer]

    Fails to entice despite excellent cast and the gothic visuals. The paste movie is too quick to identify oneself with the personages. Rather to feel sorry for Lawrence, I am happy it is over at the end.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (0)
  • very predictable

    Rated - 2.5 stars  
    By moviemanic (29 reviews) from Stockport , 03 Dec 2012
    since the movie is now being shown on film4 just after i rented it,its the same old story just different actors the special effects were good but many scenes were taken from the original black and white movie in fact i thing the whole movie is a re-make or the original black and white movie but with the better special effects
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (0) Yes |
    •  No (1)
  • A real shame

    Rated - 1.0 star  
    By The_Reviewist (2 reviews) from Penicuik , 24 Nov 2012
    Dull, plodding and predictable. That's the feel of this movie.

    Bizarrely the script itself has a few nice turns and interesting ideas, and the actors do their best to inject some charisma into proceedings.

    The problem is that the film is quite evidently a mish-mash of different ideas and vying concepts thrown together too fast. This was apparent even before I read up the troubled production history (last minute director changes, on spec script rewriting and doctoring) The sort of situation which has NEVER led to anything but mediocrity or worst in filmmaking.

    Worst of all is Benicio Del Toro, who grimly and stoicly mugs his way through the first half of the film with a character with no evident personality or understandable motives. When the defining history begins to unveil half-way through it's already too late, as we care nothing for his brooding, underwritten wolf-bait stage-actor.

    Weaving and Hopkins at least have the grace to ham things up a little, enjoying their roles to the hilt, but ultimatley this is a movie which was ovbiously written as a psychological thriller, directed as a Hammer Horror romp and butchered by a studio who wanted a Blockbusting Horror in the vein of THE MUMMY.

    Go watch the Lon-Chaney Jnr original. It's better in every regard.
    • Was this review helpful to you?
    • (1) Yes |
    •  No (0)
 

Agree or disagree? Write your own review

Please sign in to LOVEFiLM to write your review

Sign in to LOVEFiLM

Not a member yet?

Sign up to start your 30-day FREE trial