Skip over navigation

Help

Nostalgia on DVD (1983)

Nostalgia cover art
Average rating: 72%
13152131319720
3.5
from 369 members
 
Starring: Oleg Yankovsky, Domiziana Giordano, Erland Josephson
Director: Andrei Tarkovsky
Studio: ARTIFICIAL EYE
Run time: 120 mins
Certificate: 15
User collections: The Sublime on Celluloid, The List - Foreign Language Favourites
Genres: Drama
Languages: Italian
Subtitles: English
Released: 24/02/2003

Brief synopsis of Nostalgia

Director Andrei Tarkovsky recasts his lifelong cinematic motif of humanity's quest for faith in the waterlogged and mist-ensconced countryside of Italy for his philosophical masterpiece NOSTALGIA. Andrei Gorchakov (Oleg Yankovsky) is a misanthropic Russian scholar researching the life of an exiled Russian composer who committed suicide. With the help of his beautiful guide, Eugenia (Domiziana Giordano), Andrei visits mystical and religious sites on the trail of the late composer's legacy. In the shadow of the doomed composer's memory, Andrei finds himself crippled by a melancholy nostalgia for his Russian homeland, only to discover redemption in the form of a madman, Domenico (Erland Josephson), whom he encounters at St. Catherine's pool, a religious site in Sienna. Domenico, a former professor who once locked his family away for seven years in anticipation of Armageddon, now leads a seemingly insane existence, believing that if he can travel across the pool with a lighted candle, he can save all of humanity. As in his mystical film THE MIRROR, Tarkovsky weaves a dense, mediatative pattern of images--freely mixing past and present, dream and reality, color and black and white, landscape and architecture--with the scholar and the madman acting as allegorical players in a metaphysical trial by fire and water.

Related

Critics Reviews

Rating of 4 stars out of 5 Radio Times

Andrei Tarkovsky's first non-Soviet picture is clearly the work of an exile who can never regain his lost past. Yet, in rejecting a possible affair and his intellectual researches to undertake the eternal quest for enlightenment, Oleg Yankovsky finds redemption of sorts as he rises to the symbolic challenge of carrying a lighted candle across a sulphurous spa — a challenge posed by Erland Josephson, the apocalypse-obsessed resident of a Tuscan shrine town. Contrasting monochrome flashbacks with desaturated colour landscapes, Tarkovsky poetically employs langorous takes which not only convey Yankovsky's fragile mental and spiritual condition, but also heighten the mesmerising mysticism of this metaphysical allegory.

Los Angeles Times

"...In its stately, measured way NOSTALGHIA, in its culminating spirit of affirmation, becomes akin to a religious experience..."

Time Out

Another of Tarkovsky's strange, hauntingly beautiful meditations on man's search for self. The film may forsake the... Read more on www.timeout.com

See all 3 Critics Reviews »

Members Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 3 starsTarkovsky novices beware

Stephen Simpson from Croydon, England [Highly rated reviewer] , 30/11/2005

Andrei Tarkovsky was a great director, loved by most high-brow film critics: think Bergman crossed with Kubrick, but Russian and not as accessible! He made only seven feature films and they gradually became lighter on plot and heavier on symbolism (running water, horses, dogs, fire, mist) – from Ivan’s Childhood through to The Sacrifice, via Andrei Rublev (an astonishing historical epic, my favourite) and Solaris (his most famous work). The other three (Nostalgia, Mirror and Stalker) are beautiful to look at, very personal, but often incomprehensible. So if you have never seen a Tarkovsky film do not, under any circumstances, start with this one! My advice is to try them in the order he made them, as his films do require a while to get the feel of, but are well worth the effort. Two other things to note: Nostalgia is his least well-regarded film (even Tarkovsky buffs don’t like it) and there is an inherent problem that his films really are better suited to the cinema rather than DVD – they somehow feel diminished on the small screen . . .

  23 out of 24 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starsExcruciating

Joe Rohmer from Newcastle upon Tyne, England , 21/08/2004

I saw this film 20 years ago at the Tyneside Cinema in Newcastle. It is quite the most stupendously, unbelievably, gob-smackingly boring film I have seen in my life. It seems to last for six or seven hours and achieves an unprecidented level of self-indulgent tedium. Quite remarkable, really.

There's a scene where a man carries a lighted candle across an extremely wide and shallow paddling pool. He does this so slowly it almost appears in slow motion. Just before he reaches the other side the candle blows out, so he returns, lights the candle and starts the process over again.

To illustrate how long this scene lasts I will tell you that half way through I went to the cinema cafe and had a leisurely coffee. When I returned the guy was still trying to get the candle across the pool.

If you're thinking of committing suicide and can't work up the courage, rent this film. After sitting through an hour of it you will gladly embrace death.

  26 out of 49 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsLost in translation????

Jenny from Falmouth Cornwall , 20/02/2006

I tried so hard with this .... persevered for an eternity but still could not fully grasp this renowned masterpiece which I had so desperately hoped to enjoy... Maybe the fault was mine ... would it have been easier in its original without resorting to subtitles ... or have I just totally lost the plot? Answers on a postcard please...

  3 out of 4 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsFrom Russia

A customer from Scotland , 14/06/2007

Tarkovsky a brilliant and sadly missed director who has not been bettered since his untimely departure from this mortal coil. All his films have an air that gives the viewer a stillness not usually found on film,rather more often found in the mystical places around the world where peace is not disturbed. Sadly becoming scarcer each sun up. Please rent this beautiful work.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 2 starsLost in translation????

Jenny from Falmouth Cornwall , 20/02/2006

I tried so hard with this .... persevered for an eternity but still could not fully grasp this renowned masterpiece which I had so desperately hoped to enjoy... Maybe the fault was mine ... would it have been easier in its original without resorting to subtitles ... or have I just totally lost the plot? Answers on a postcard please...

  3 out of 4 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 1 starslooks so wonderful but ...

A customer from london , 17/09/2008

Oh dear, this is the kind of film that makes the viewer think he/she isn't deep enough to understand it. In fact, it is utterly beautiful to look at but completely vacuous. The pseudo-intellectual ramblings which the protagonist voices Tarkovsky's sense of alienation are risibly banal. Lost in translation possibly ... but maybe not much there in the original either. Andrej Rublev was a great film, this is a truly self-indulgent one.

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews