Skip over navigation

Help

Elephant on DVD (2003)

Elephant cover art
Play Elephant trailer
Average rating: 65%
1326619172057
3.0
from 2,293 members
 
Starring: Alex Frost
Director: Gus Van Sant
Studio: HIGH FLIERS
Run time: 80 mins
Certificate: 15
User collections: Best Films (in my opinion), My Favourite Films (Ongoing), KEN DIGWEED, Disturbing movies or scenes in movies, Movies that have you thinking, 50 Cinematic Gems, Palme d'Or Winners, Crabsticks
Genres: Drama
Languages: English
Released: 07/06/2004

Brief synopsis of Elephant

Gus Van Sant's drifty, eloquent, and effortlessly poignant ELEPHANT is loosely based on the massacre at Columbine High School. (On April 20, 1999 in Littleton, Colorado two 17-year-old boys fired semi-automatic weapons on their high school classmates, killing 13, injuring 25, and then taking their own lives.) Van Sant's film is set in Portland, Oregon and uses non-actors chosen from an open casting call of high school students. On a crisp, sunny Autumn day, with colourful leaves on the trees and puffy clouds drifting across blue skies, students arrive at school as usual. Eli takes photographs for his portfolio, John manages problems with his alcoholic father, Acadia attends a gay-lesbian meeting, Nate plays a game of tag football, and Michelle works in the library. Meanwhile, two outsiders, Eric and Alex, harbour hatred for their peers. Each of ELEPHANT's students have unique interests and personalities, and the film respectfully emphasises their individuality. It also demonstrates how school is an unpredictable blender where students' differences are constantly agitated. Harris Savides' excellent photography--shot in 1:33 aspect ratio, making the movie a cube in the centre of the screen--follows and floats, sometimes blurring and juxtaposing the light to achieve an ethereal mood; while Leslie Shatz's ambient sound design and a soundtrack of soft Beethoven piano music completes that feeling. The film is structured in brief overlapping chapters all taking place on the morning of the 11:35 A.M. attack.
ELEPHANT won the Palme D'Or and Best Director at the 2003 Cannes Film Festival.

Related

Critics Reviews

Rating of 3 stars out of 5 Radio Times

With its title taken from Alan Clarke's 1989 BBC drama about violence in Northern Ireland, director Gus Van Sant's Palme d'Or-winning film documents a normal day at an ordinary American high school. Except this day ends in a senseless massacre, much like the Columbine killings to which it alludes. The main characters are real students using their actual names, and their matter-of-fact casual encounters and improvised snatched conversations are detailed in long travelling shots, often replayed from slightly different perspectives, before Alex (Alex Frost) and Eric (Eric Deulen) enter school in camouflage gear carrying internet-purchased assault weapons. It's either a disturbing yet poetic disaster movie, or an unsatisfyingly arty view of a contemporary malaise that offers no reasons or solutions. By sitting on the fence and not apportioning blame, Van Sant's experimental drama raises more questions than it answers — and that's perhaps his point.

Time Out

The surprise recipient of the Palme d'Or at Cannes 2003, Van Sant's movie began life as a conventional Hollywood... Read more on www.timeout.com

The Independent

"...An extraordinary, sublime piece of filmmaking that unsettles as it enthrals..."

See all 4 Critics Reviews »

Members Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 5 starsa strange thing of beauty.....

Gonzosoul from The Thoroughfare, Woodbridge , 21/06/2004

This film is a comment on the Columbine massacre and gun culture in America. In a way its closer to the truth of the incident than Michael Moore's 'Bowling for Columbine' just like a painting might convey more internal feelings than a photograph.

The Photography in this film was very beautiful with an interesting use of depth of field, camera movement and slow motion. The sound was claustrophobic like a horror movie.

This film may offend certain peoples moral sensiblities, but I found it unconventional, hard hitting and strangley very beautiful.

  53 out of 66 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starsElephant Feet

A customer from Sunderland , 03/07/2005

This film bored my brain. However I thought that Michael Caines performance as the 'bad' cop was immense. He really should of won an oscar for that.

  44 out of 60 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsUnsettling stereotypes

JedediahLeland from Berkshire , 05/08/2004

It is difficult to know what to say about Gus Van Sant's 'Elephant'. Cinematically 'Elephant' is worth its Cannes accolade. The sweeping, languous steadycam shots that follow the main character through a seemingly ordinary day at school are reminiscent of the brilliance of Van Sant's 'Drugstore Cowboy era.

However, as an investigation of the background to the horrific Colombine murders, 'Elephant' is sadly lacking. The acting from Van Sant's young cast rings hollow. The narrative, while posing many questions, fails to engage with any of them. Most importantly, the film uses badly drawn stereotypes to position its characters. There are the jocks, the geeks, the pretty girls with eating disorders who simultaneously throw up in the toilets. These are the character who would be more at home in a teen movie like 'American Pie'.

Most worrying are the characters of the two killers. They are portrayed as extreme outsiders. Their lives are down trodden, surrounded by violent video games and footage of Nazi rallies. They are shown to be experimenting with their homosexuality for the first time. Does Van Sant equate homosexuality with this sort of gun crime?

I find it difficult to accept Van Sant's broad brush strokes and he seeming unwillingness to engage with the real issues behind gun crime amongst American youth. For all the visual dexterity and beauty of this film I feel that it adds nothing to the debate.

  31 out of 38 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 2 starsHmmm....not sure about the hooplah on this one

A customer from London, England , 02/09/2004

Gus Van Sant, clearly one of the more interesting directors around, won the big prize at Cannes for this film. The question is: Pourquoi? There are some interesting elements, to be sure, especially some of the teasing aspects of the stories you THINK you're going to either hear about or, at a minimum, get a bit more about. Ultimately, however, the jiggly-jaggly hand-held camera and the documentary 'style' leaves you a bit cold. Still, even after saying all of that, I think this film merits watching. The IDEA is fantastic; the execution (pardon the pun) is less than successful.

  14 out of 19 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 3 starsBeautifully shot

Lisa Kielty from Scotland , 08/02/2007

I am not a real fan of Gus VS but really appreciated the slow shots and lengthy takes of intimate moments with each character before the final crescendo.

However, there is no real insight or comment on the issues raised in this film and the preoccupation is definitely on the aesthetics of the shots, etc.

The ending is a little baffling and very abrupt, with none of the questions raised by the hour long character studies, answered. An enjoyable film to cut critical teeth on but expect no satisfaction at the end.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 5 starsa strange thing of beauty.....

Gonzosoul from The Thoroughfare, Woodbridge , 21/06/2004

This film is a comment on the Columbine massacre and gun culture in America. In a way its closer to the truth of the incident than Michael Moore's 'Bowling for Columbine' just like a painting might convey more internal feelings than a photograph.

The Photography in this film was very beautiful with an interesting use of depth of field, camera movement and slow motion. The sound was claustrophobic like a horror movie.

This film may offend certain peoples moral sensiblities, but I found it unconventional, hard hitting and strangley very beautiful.

  53 out of 66 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews