Skip over navigation

Help

Pickup On South Street on DVD (1953)

Pickup On South Street cover art
Average rating: 74%
1111210142037
3.5
from 181 members
 
Starring: Richard Widmark, Jean Peters, Thelma Ritter, Murvyn Vye
Director: Samuel Fuller
Studio: OPTIMUM HOME ENTERTAINMENT
Run time: 90 mins
Certificate: PG
Genres: Drama
Languages: English
Released: 19/07/2004

Brief synopsis of Pickup On South Street

This film noir classic plays on America's paranoia about a Communist takeover in the 1950s. Dwelling in a neon-lit nightscape are: a pickpocket, Skip McCoy; an abused dame, Candy; a seen-it-all stoolie, Moe; Joey, Candy's violent boyfriend and Communist plotter; shifty G-Men; cynical cops; and a whole nest of vipers in fedoras and trenchcoats. Joey forces Candy to deliver a secret package for him. Then Skip snatches Candy's purse and inadvertently takes a cryptic film that some underground Reds have stolen. A pair of Feds tracking the film's whereabouts witness the pickpocket and close in on him. But Skip first considers cutting a deal with the Communists. Then he realises that several parties are interested in the film--and some are even willing to kill for it! Thelma Ritter was nominated for an Oscar for her performance.

Related

Critics Reviews

Rating of 2 stars out of 5 Radio Times

A pick-up that's a hiccup for petty thief Richard Widmark, pocketing more than he bargained for by stealing Jean Peters's purse, only to find it loaded with espionage plans. Not one of director Sam Fuller's most successful outings the anti-Communist spiel seems tacked on to cash in on contemporary hysteria though it's worth a look for Thelma Ritter's acid-drop old lady betraying all and sundry to save up for “a plot and a stone”. She carries conviction; the other characters deserve one.

Time Out

A superb thriller dismissed by many as a McCarthyist tract on its first appearance. Nominally about the hunting of... Read more on www.timeout.com

Rating of 3 
	  stars out of 4 Halliwell's Film Guide

Over-rich mixture of crime, violence and anti-communism, smartly made.

See all 3 Critics Reviews »

Members Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 3 starsPick Up on South Street

Craig Methven from Kent , 15/10/2004

A great looking claustrophobic b-movie with the gaunt Widmark compressing layers of, at turns, aggression, passion and menace in this tale of stolen film. Thelma Ritter almost steals the show in a supporting role, but the plot sometimes stutters and eventually tails off so abruptly that you feel it could have had another half hour to go.

  5 out of 5 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsWho Cares?

Leon Collins from London , 18/04/2005

A well-structured noir with fine lead performances, notably Thelma Ritter as the *professional stool pigeon* Moe. The *red menance* is just a Mcguffin as Widmark brushes aside appeals by the police to his patriotism with a larconic *Who cares?*.

  3 out of 4 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsDated Commie-bashing Propaganda from the McCarthy Era

johnny_friendly from London, England , 10/04/2005

There are two ways of approaching this film - on an aesthetic level and on a political one. Aesthetically, it's a fine film, full of dark expressionism and no-good dames who turn out to have proverbial hearts-of-gold. But it's the politics of this film that I felt uncomfortable with. The basic premise is that there are these 'evil commies' who are out to subvert the wholesome American way of life without ever at any point attempting to analyse the complexities of Cold War imperatives or the nature of American fear and paranoia. Back then it was 'commies', today its 'terrorists' but the hysteria was the same.

In view of the political events of the past four years, I just find it hard if not outright distasteful to see Americans as 'the good guys' and everyone else as 'bad' which is the undercurrent that pervades this film throughout. For me, it disqualified much of the aesthetic considerations of this film. The love scenes are clumsy too.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 4 starsFilm noir at it's very best

A customer from Sheffield, England , 28/03/2005

Excellent film noir from cult director Samuel Fuller. Good script, well acted and infused with a claustrophobic intensity that seeps into every frame. Highly recommended.

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 3 starsPick Up on South Street

Craig Methven from Kent , 15/10/2004

A great looking claustrophobic b-movie with the gaunt Widmark compressing layers of, at turns, aggression, passion and menace in this tale of stolen film. Thelma Ritter almost steals the show in a supporting role, but the plot sometimes stutters and eventually tails off so abruptly that you feel it could have had another half hour to go.

  5 out of 5 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 3 starsDated Commie-bashing Propaganda from the McCarthy Era

johnny_friendly from London, England , 10/04/2005

There are two ways of approaching this film - on an aesthetic level and on a political one. Aesthetically, it's a fine film, full of dark expressionism and no-good dames who turn out to have proverbial hearts-of-gold. But it's the politics of this film that I felt uncomfortable with. The basic premise is that there are these 'evil commies' who are out to subvert the wholesome American way of life without ever at any point attempting to analyse the complexities of Cold War imperatives or the nature of American fear and paranoia. Back then it was 'commies', today its 'terrorists' but the hysteria was the same.

In view of the political events of the past four years, I just find it hard if not outright distasteful to see Americans as 'the good guys' and everyone else as 'bad' which is the undercurrent that pervades this film throughout. For me, it disqualified much of the aesthetic considerations of this film. The love scenes are clumsy too.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews