Skip over navigation

Help

Godsend on DVD (2004)

Godsend cover art
Play Godsend trailer
Average rating: 53%
1421211206411
2.5
from 480 members
 
Starring: Greg Kinnear, Rebecca Romijn-Stamos, Robert De Niro, Cameron Bright, Jenny Levine, Deborah Odell
Director: Nick Hamm
Studio: PATHE DISTRIBUTION
Run time: 98 mins
Certificate: 15
User collections: Thrillers & Horrors.....the good and the bad
Genres: Audio Descriptive, Drama, Thriller
Languages: English, English Audio Description
Hearing-impaired: English
Released: 08/11/2004

Brief synopsis of Godsend

The trials of parenthood are at the forefront of this murky horror effort that recalls 1970s child-possession hits like AUDREY ROSE ('77) and The EXORCIST ('73). Inner-city school teacher Paul (Greg Kinnear) and his wife Jessica (Rebecca Romijn-Stamos) are distraught after losing their eight-year-old son David (Cameron Bright) in an accident. At the funeral, Jessica's old science professor Dr. Wells (Robert De Niro) offers them a chance to rebuild their lives: a mansion in the country near his DNA clinic, a private school teaching job for Paul, and an exact clone of their dead son. Sworn to secrecy and facing all sorts of moral issues, the grief-stricken couple accepts Wells' offer. All goes well until the new David passes the age he previously died, then comes ghostly visions of burning children, and premonitions of murder. A creepily unobtrusive score and the film's drab look help maintain a welcome low-key, character-driven mood here, with the result that GODSEND works both as a standard horror film and a darkly psychological meditation on the uncertainty, misgivings, and sheer terror involved with child rearing. Deniro is great, as usual, and the gorgeous Romijn-Stamos proves herself adept in an unglamorous, tensely dramatic change-of-pace role as the split-apart mother.

Related

Critics Reviews

Rating of 2 stars out of 5 Radio Times

Robert De Niro revives the notorious old cliché of the mad scientist in this horror thriller from The Hole director, Nick Hamm. When the eight-year-old son (Cameron Bright) of Greg Kinnear and Rebecca Romijn-Stamos dies, De Niro's benign doctor offers to clone the dead boy at his Godsend Fertility Clinic. All goes well for a time, but then sinister cracks appear in the good doctor's façade. The cloned child also begins to exhibit signs of evil — recalling those other killer kiddies from The Exorcist and The Omen. Hamm manages to distance the pervasive wickedness from the warmth of family life with macabre expertise. But, apart from some neat shocks, the story is painfully predictable, even if it is a timely warning of the way science can take over our lives.

Time Out

There's more than a hint of The Omen in this horror movie about a family that is slowly destroyed by a little girl they... Read more on www.timeout.com

See all 2 Critics Reviews »

Members Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 1 starsAppalling

NegativeFactor from Shropshire , 10/09/2004

It’s not very often I rate a film with an unwatchable 1 point, but ‘Godsend’ really did earn it.

First things first, completely ignore the trailer for this film. The trailer tricks you into thinking this is a horror film. You do have all the perfect horror ingredients, weird kid, flash backs, dead people (sound familiar?) and an enigmatic doctor type. However they seem to have gone bad in the mix, very bad.

The basic premise is that a young boy dies at the age of eight. In a state of distress his parents are offered an exact clone of their child by a mysterious doctor (De Niro). Ethics out the window the parents opt for the clone. Things are fine up until the point the cloned child exceeds the life of his dead counterpart. From this point on things go, well, pear shaped.

I won’t give away the ending to much, but let’s just say it would have been better if the cast of ‘Queer eye for the straight guy’ suddenly appeared and revelled that the clone simply needed a ‘makeover’.

This film really is appalling; it doesn’t even warrant a straight-to-video, more apt would be a straight-to-bin.

  23 out of 27 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starsDon't waste your time

A customer from England , 20/12/2004

The first half hour or so of this film is great. Unfortunately, it goes downhill after that. It's full of repetitive and confusing dream sequences which lead to a disappointing explanation and a downright confusing denouement. By the end, you just don't care about the characters. Plus, without giving away the plotline, why De Niro's character would have wanted to do what he did anyway is utterly nonsensical. I was really looking forward to seeing this film, but it was an ultimate waste of time.

  20 out of 26 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsExcellent film making at its best

A customer from Uxbridge , 15/11/2004

Despite the other view on here, I found this film to be excellent, and the alternative endings actually show how much thought went into this film.

What needs to be taken into account is that the director is British, and Hollywood ethics dictate how films should end. Therefore watching the film through you get a fine film, with a very American ending, but with the extras you get to see how the director originally intended the film to end - and how perhaps it would have ended had Film Four still be around. As it is, all of the 4 alternative endings are much darker than the one that made the final cut and more reminiscent of a British film.

Aside from that, the film is perfectly scripted, perfectly acted, and has a twist that takes ages to properly work out, never once patronising the audience by being predictable.

It challenges whatever views you may hold on the ethics of cloning and poses the question 'can you really trust science, when the scientist is only human?'

Should have done much better at the box office. This is probably my film of the year!

  15 out of 22 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 1 starsGarbled, reactionary nonsense

Soutpiel from London, England , 10/03/2005

I won't waste too much space repeating what so many others here have said. The charcters are bland and lack depth, the acting is lame, the plot laboured, and the twists predictable yet unbelievable.

What annoyed me most, though, is the garbled anti-cloning message. Sure, human cloning is a serious issue that needs to be properly thought out; the science, the politics, the ethics need to be intelligently explored. This film does none of these things. The message seems to be - mess with nature, and unleash evil.

Along with this - a troubling religious sub-text. 'Godsend' is the name of the Institute that does the cloning. Double meaning - 'God's End' - geddit? The characters make a few references to God and praying, reminding us that these are God-like powers the characters are dabbling with. But even this apparent straightforward reactionary knee-jerk is garbled by the end - is the evil the result of human nature or bad science?

Stupid, offensive, incoherent moralising of the worst kind. What's more, it even fails as basic entertainment.

  10 out of 14 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 4 starsWOW! Cliff Hanger

A customer from Essex, England , 18/06/2005

WOW! It was one of those films that disguises the shock in the story line from the trailers. Its deffinately scary but will there be another as there seemed to be a cliff hanger there?

  1 out of 1 person found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 1 starsAppalling

NegativeFactor from Shropshire , 10/09/2004

It’s not very often I rate a film with an unwatchable 1 point, but ‘Godsend’ really did earn it.

First things first, completely ignore the trailer for this film. The trailer tricks you into thinking this is a horror film. You do have all the perfect horror ingredients, weird kid, flash backs, dead people (sound familiar?) and an enigmatic doctor type. However they seem to have gone bad in the mix, very bad.

The basic premise is that a young boy dies at the age of eight. In a state of distress his parents are offered an exact clone of their child by a mysterious doctor (De Niro). Ethics out the window the parents opt for the clone. Things are fine up until the point the cloned child exceeds the life of his dead counterpart. From this point on things go, well, pear shaped.

I won’t give away the ending to much, but let’s just say it would have been better if the cast of ‘Queer eye for the straight guy’ suddenly appeared and revelled that the clone simply needed a ‘makeover’.

This film really is appalling; it doesn’t even warrant a straight-to-video, more apt would be a straight-to-bin.

  23 out of 27 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews