Skip over navigation

Help

Rope on DVD (1948)

Rope cover art
Play Rope trailer
Average rating: 75%
111129122049
3.5
from 1,313 members
 
Starring: James Stewart, John Dall, Farley Granger, Cedric Hardwicke, Constance Collier, Reese Witherspoon, Douglas Dick, Edith Evanson
Director: Alfred Hitchcock
Studio: UNIVERSAL PICTURES UK
Run time: 77 mins
Certificate: PG
Collections: 100 Top Thrillers
User collections: Superb Films of the 1940's, A Filmmaker's Selection, Handule, Lesser-known gay gems, THE classics, Best FREAKIN films EVR!!!, My favourite Directors
Genres: Thriller
Languages: English
Released: 21/04/2003

Brief synopsis of Rope

Based on the famous Leopold and Loeb murder case (from which two other films, COMPULSION and SWOON, were also derived), ROPE both challenges and terrifies the audience. Alfred Hitchcock disdained the whodunit crime story, which he felt lacked emotional force, and ROPE shows the director's preference for letting the audience know more than the characters onscreen. The film opens as two young men (Farley Granger and John Dall) strangle a friend just to prove they're intellectually capable of committing the perfect crime. To add to the amusement, they hide the body in a trunk that will serve as the dinner table for a party honoring the deceased. The film hones in on an hour and a half of the party, with the constantly moving camera capturing the changing emotional atmosphere as the guests grow increasingly concerned about the fate of the missing boy. ROPE is a directorial tour de force, blending complex camera movement with intricate staging to present the entire story in near-real time in one location. Notably, the adaptation of the play by Patrick Hamilton was written by perennial Hitchcock actor Hume Cronyn.

Related

Critics Reviews

Rating of 3 stars out of 5 Radio Times

Alfred Hitchcock here places a pair of homosexual student murderers (Farley Granger and John Dall) in a fashionable New York apartment, where they give a party for academic James Stewart and relatives of the young victim, whose body is present in a trunk from which they serve the drinks. Curiously devoid of suspense, the film is more of an intriguing cerebral exercise, famous as an experiment in the technique of the continuous take than a characteristic Hitchcockian entertainment or character study. Based on the real-life Leopold and Loeb case, it remains historically interesting, but both subject (see Richard Fleischer's 1959 film Compulsion) and technique have moved on, and Rope, today, disappoints.

Rating of 2 
	  stars out of 4 Halliwell's Film Guide

An effective piece of Grand Guignol on the stage, this seemed rather tasteless when set in a New York skyscraper, especially when the leading role of the investigator was miscast and Hitch had saddled himself with the ten-minute take, a short-lived techni

Time Out

One of Hitchcock's more experimental films, with the tale of two young gays, keen to prove their intellectual and... Read more on www.timeout.com

See all 4 Critics Reviews »

Members Reviews

Reviews Voted Most Helpful

Rated - 5 starsOnly Hitchcock.....

Chris from London , 10/05/2004

Not only is the film shot in real time and on one set, but it is also uses only one camera shot without cuts! This means one take for the entire film, and yet Hitchcock still crafts an excellent film around this technical trick. Highly recommended to anyone interested in people as well as anyone intersted in film technique, this film really makes a change from todays rapid fire cutting.

  8 out of 10 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsDisappointing version of an English play

A customer from Cheltenham, England , 24/10/2005

This play was far in advance of its time, covering homosexuality which was taboo in those days. The fact that the American censors had got their hands on it took away much of the atmosphere of a Patrick Hamilton plotline.

The film just did not have the right feel about it when you consider the seriousness of the the crime.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 3 starsUnusual classic

djcmackay from Cambridge , 05/08/2004

Whodunnit is revealed in the first scene. The just-for-the-hell-of-it playboy murderers throw a dinner party for the victim's friends and relations, and for the teacher who inspired them to carry out the crime.

A gripping watch, especially once Jimmie Stewart is on-set.

The hitchcock gimmick of making the film look as if it is shot in just two very long takes is technically impressive; but since several joins are rather obvious, I think it would have been even more impressive if he had made it look like the 12 takes it actually is.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Rated - 5 starsRope

A customer from Leeds, England , 08/02/2005

Every element of this film is testament to Hitchcock's genius. Watching films of this calibre made in 1948 can make you completely baffled by the bigger / better 'blockbuster' mentality which occurs in so much film making today. A masterpiece and a gem.

Report offending content.

Read all reviews

Most Recent Reviews

Rated - 3 starsUnusual classic

djcmackay from Cambridge , 05/08/2004

Whodunnit is revealed in the first scene. The just-for-the-hell-of-it playboy murderers throw a dinner party for the victim's friends and relations, and for the teacher who inspired them to carry out the crime.

A gripping watch, especially once Jimmie Stewart is on-set.

The hitchcock gimmick of making the film look as if it is shot in just two very long takes is technically impressive; but since several joins are rather obvious, I think it would have been even more impressive if he had made it look like the 12 takes it actually is.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews

Rated - 3 starsDisappointing version of an English play

A customer from Cheltenham, England , 24/10/2005

This play was far in advance of its time, covering homosexuality which was taboo in those days. The fact that the American censors had got their hands on it took away much of the atmosphere of a Patrick Hamilton plotline.

The film just did not have the right feel about it when you consider the seriousness of the the crime.

  2 out of 2 people found this review helpful
Report offending content.

Read all highest rated reviews